CORRELATION BETWEEN THE RANKING OF WINTER WHEAT GENOTYPES BY GRAIN YIELD AND STABILITY THROUGH VARIOUS STATISTICAL APPROACHES
Keywords:
wheat, grain yield genotype* environment (GE), stability, AMMI and GGEAbstract
Setting and aim: The environmental conditions have a serious impact on grain yield of cereals. The change in the reaction of a variety yield is reason to look for ways for its evaluation despite his strong GE interaction. The aim of this study was to establish an effective model for the separation of varieties based on the magnitude of the yield and the stability in a wide range of environmental conditions.
Methods: In a typical country locations of testing (5) for four years 24 varieties of winter wheat, were studied. In the most detail the GE interaction by four statistical approaches that are current was analysed. The ranking approach in determining the yield stability and their interactions using the criteria “yield”, “stability” and “yield-stability” is attached. The possibilities of each method to evaluate the effect of GE for establishing the essential differences between varieties were analysed.
Key results: The GE interaction is essential and sets about 1/3 of the total variation of the trait. Its nature is complex and diffi cult to measure. A large share of the nonlinear interaction of the variety by environment is established. The most signifi cant share of the interaction is between season * location (88 %), and the effect of genotype is about 10-12%. The arrangement of the tested varieties through various statistical methods is different, which is a prerequisite for a serious analysis of their grain yield behaviour.
Conclusions: The relationship between the three tested criteria of traits expressed by main types of correlations show that the “yield-stability” has a strong link with the other two criteria. This is reason to believe that each of applied statistical models for effective differentiation of behaviour of the variety in the group. The most relevant to achieving the objective are two commonly used model AMMI and GGE, due to the presence of software packages for their rapid implementation and visualization.
References
Abakemal, D., H. Shimelis and J. Derera, 2016. Genotype-byenvironment interaction and yield stability of quality protein maize hybrids developed from tropical-highland adapted inbred lines. Euphytica, 209: 757-769.
Agyeman, A., E. Parkes and B. B. Peprah, 2015. AMMI and GGE biplot analysis of root yield performance of cassava genotypes in the forest and coastal ecologies. International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research, 3: 222-232.
Ahmadi, J., A. Mohammadi and T. N. Mirak, 2012. Targeting promising bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines for cold climate growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analyses. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 14: 645-657.
Alberts, M., 2004. A comparison of statistical methods to describe genotype x environment interaction and yield stability in multilocation maize trails. Magister of Science Thesis, University of Free State, S. Africa. pp. 96.
Annicchiarico, P., 2002 Genotype x Environment Interactions – Challenges and Opportunities for Plant Breeding and Cultivar Recommendations, FAO. Plant Production and Protection Paper, 174, pp. 202.
Asfaw, A., F. Alemayehu, F. Gurum and M. Atnaf, 2009. AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analysis for matching varieties onto soybean production environments in Ethiopia. Scientifi c Research and Essay, 4: 1322-1330.
Ayciccek, M. and T. Yilderim, 2006. Adaptability of some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes in the Eastern region of Turkey. Inter. J. of Science and Technology, 1: 83-89.
Bose, L. K., N. N. Jambhulkar, K. Pande and O. N. Singh, 2014. Use of AMMI and other stability statistics in the simultaneous selection of rice genotypes for yield and stability under directseeded conditions. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 74: 3-9.
Ding, M., T. Bruce and Y. Weikai, 2008. Application of GGE biplot analysis to evaluate genotype (G), environment (E) and GxE interaction on Pinus radiata: A case study. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 38: 132-142.
Dyulgerova, B. and N. Dyulgerov, 2016. Genotype by environment interaction in mutant lines of winter barley for grain yield.
Agricultural Science And Technology, 8: 14-18.
Finlay, K. W. and G. N. Wilkinson, 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14: 742-754.
Gauch, H. G. and R. W. Zobel, 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. pp. 85-122. In: M. S. Kang and H. G. Gauch (Eds.). Genotype-by-Environment Interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Golkari, S., R. Haghparast, E. Roohi, S. Mobasser, M. M. Ahmadi, K. Soleimani, G. Khalilzadeh, G. Abedi-Asl and T. Babaei, 2016. Multi-environment evaluation of winter bread wheat genotypes under rainfed conditions of Iran-using AMMI model. Crop Breeding Journal, 4-6: 17-31.
Grogan, S. M., J. Anderson, S. Baenziger, K. Frels, M. J. Guttieri, S. D. Haley, K. S. Kim, S. Liu, G. S. McMaster, M. Newell, P. V. Prasad, S. D. Reid, K. J. Shroyer, G. Zhang, E. Akhunov and P. F. Byrne, 2016. Phenotypic Plasticity of Winter Wheat Heading Date and Grain Yield across the US Great Plains. Crop Science, 56: 2223-2236.
Gubatov, T., I. Yanchev and N. Tsenov, 2016. Effect of the environments on the productivity-related characters in common winter wheat. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 22: 927-935.
Huehn, M., 1990. Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Part 1: Theory. Euphytica, 47: 189-194.
Kang, M. S., 1988. A rank-sum method for selecting high-yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Research Communications, 16: 113-115.
Kang, M. S., 1993. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agronomy J., 85: 754-757.
Kang, M. S., 2002. Genotype-environment interaction: progress and prospects. In: Kang M. (Ed.) Quantitative genetics, Genomics and Plant Breeding, CABI Publishing, pp. 221-243.
Karimizadeh, R., A. Asghari, R. Chinipardaz, O. Sofalian and A. Ghaffari, 2016. Application of GGE biplot analysis to evaluate grain yield stability of rainfed spring durum wheat genotypes and test locations by climatic factors in Iran. Crop Breeding Journal, 4-6: 41-49.
Kaya, Y. and M. Turkoz, 2016. Evaluation of genotype by environment interaction for grain yield in durum wheat using nonparametric stability statistics. Turk J Field Crops, 21: 50-58.
Lin, C. S., M. R. Binns and L. P. Lefkovitch, 1986. Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Science, 26: 894-900.
Malla, S., A. M H I., R. Little, S. Kalsbeck, K. D. Glover and C. Ren, 2010. Comparison of shifted multiplicative model, rank correlation, and biplot analysis for clustering winter wheat production environments. Euphytica, 174: 357-370.
Najafi an, G., A. K. Kaffashi and A. Jafar-Nezhad, 2010. Analysis of grain yield stability in hexaploid wheat genotypes grown in temperate regions of Iran using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 12: 213-222.
Namorato, H. M., G. V. Souza, L. V. De Oliveira, L. R. Delima and R. Oliveira, 2009. Comparing Biplot Multivariate Analyses with Eberhart and Russell’ Method for Genotype x Environment Interaction. Biotechnology, 9: 299-307.
Ramazani, S. H. R., H. Tajalli and M. Ghoudsi, 2016. Evaluation of grain yield stability of superior triticale Genotypes. Bulg. J.
Agric. Sci., 22: 976-981.
Roostaei, M., R. Mohammadi and A. Amri, 2014. Rank correlation among different statistical models in ranking of winter wheat genotypes. The Crop Journal, 2: 154-163.
Sabaghnia, N., R. Karimizadeh and M. Mohammadi, 2013. GGL biplot analysis of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum spp. durum) yield in multi-environment trials. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 19: 756-765.
Sabaghpour, S. H., S. F. Danyali, F. Razavi, D. Tobe and A. Ebadi, 2012. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis for grain yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Iran. International Scholarly Research Network, 6: 1-12.
Shukla, G., 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype environmental components of variability. Heredity, 29: 237-245.
Snape, J., M. Foulkes, J. Simmonds, M. Leverington, L. Fish, Y. Wang and M. Ciavarrella, 2007. Dissecting gene x environment effects on wheat yields via QTL and physiological analysis. Euphytica, 154: 401-408.
Storck, L., G. Benin, V. S. Marchioro, R. R. Silva, L. G. Woyann
and E. Bornhofen, 2016. Strategy for grouping wheat genotypes according to environmental responses in multilocation trials. Ausralian J. Crop Science, 10: 571-578.
Tazu, Z., 2011. Statistical analysis of genotype by environment interactions and grain yield stability in bread wheat using ANOVA and AMMI models. Magister of Science Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. pp. 95.
Yan, W., 2001. GGE biplot-a Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of twoway data. Agronomy J., 93: 1111-1118.
Yan, W. and L. A. Hunt, 2001. Interpretation of genotype – environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Science, 41: 19-25.
Yan, W., L. A. Hunt, Q. Sheng and Z. Szlavnics, 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Sci., 40: 597-605.
Yan, W. and M. S. Kang, 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists and Agronomists, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 213.
Zhang, Z., C. Lu and Z. H. Xiang, 1998. Stability analysis for varieties by AMMI model, Acta Agron. Sinica, 24: 304-309.
Zobel, R. W., M. J. Wright and H.G. Gauch, 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J., 80: 388-393.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
