COMPETITION POWER OF TURKEY’S HONEY EXPORT AND COMPARISON WITH BALKAN COUNTRIES

Authors

  • MUSTAFA TERİN Van Yuzuncu Yıl University, College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics 65080-Van, Turkey Author
  • İBRAHIM YILDIRIM Van Yuzuncu Yıl University, College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics 65080-Van, Turkey Author
  • ADEM AKSOY Atatürk University, College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics 25240-Erzurum, Turkey Author
  • MEHMET MUHAMMED SARI Atatürk University, College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics 25240-Erzurum, Turkey Author

Keywords:

honey export, Revealed Comparative Advantage Index, Trade Balance Index, Balkan countries, Turkey

Abstract

Beekeeping is one of the oldest agricultural activities in the world. This activity, which is performed traditionally in some countries, has signifi cant functions such as increasing income of producers and contributing to pollution crop production. Turkey has signifi cant potential in honey production with proper ecology, rich fl ora and material genetic variation in bees. Determining the level of export competitiveness of honey in Turkey and comparing it with that of Balkan Countries (Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Moldavia, Montenegro, Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, and Slovenia) for 2001-2015 periods, was the major aim of this study. The competitiveness level of honey export was calculated using Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) index and Trade Balance Index (TBI). The data of this study was provided from International Trade Centre (INTRACEN) database. The results revealed that the average RCA and TBI scores for Turkey were 1.86 and 0.86, respectively. The fi ndings shows that despite of weak comparative advantage, Turkey is still a net exporter country in honey export. According to the average RCA scores, Bulgaria, Romania and Serbia have strong, Croatia and Greece have low, and Republic of Macedonia has a weak comparative advantage in honey export while Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia have no comparative advantage in honey export.

References

Aiginger, K., 2000. Specialization of European manufacturing.

Australian Economic Quarterly, 2: 81-92.

Altay, B. and K. Gürpınar, 2008. Revealed comparative advantage and some competition power index: An application on Turkish furniture sector. Afyon Kocatepe Universty, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal, 10 (1): 257274.

Balassa, B., 1965. Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage. The Manchester School, 33: 99-123.

Bashimov, G., 2016. Turkey’s export performance of tomato and competitiveness. Alınteri Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31 (B) http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-fi le/267292

Bojnec, S. and I. Fertö, 2007. Comparative advantages in agrofood trade of Hungary, Croatia and Slovenia with the European Union, IAMO Discussion Paper No. 106, Germany.

Çakmak, Ö.A., 2005. Revealed comparative advantage and competition power: An application on Turkish textile and ready wear industry. Ege Academic Review, 5 (1): 65-76.

Çicek, R. and G. Bashimov, 2016. Determination of central Asia’s comparative advantage in cotton trade. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 12 (28): 1-14.

Engindeniz, S., K. Uçar and C. Başaran, 2014. Economic aspects and problems of beekeeping in İzmir. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 20 (2):113-120.

FAOSTAT, 2017. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QL (07.03.2017)

Firatli, C., F. Genç, M. Karacaoğlu and H.V. Gencer, 2000. A comparative analysis of Turkish beekeeping, problems and suggestions. Proceedings the 5th Technical Turkish Agricultural Engineering Congresses. Ankara, Turkey.

Güler, A. and M. Demir, 2005. Beekeeping potential in Turkey.

Bee World, 86 (4): 114-119.

Hinloopen, J. and C.V. Marrewijk, 2000. On the Empirical Distribution of the Balassa Index, Review of World Economics, 137 (1): 1-35.

INTRACEN, 2017. International Trade Center.

http://www.intracen.org/itc/market-info-tools/statistics-importproduct-country/ (07.03.2017).

Kanaka, S. and M. Chinadurai, 2012. A study of comparative advantage of Indian agricultural exports. Journal of Management and Science, 2 (3): 1-9.

Koç, B., M. Terin, M. Ceylan and E. Dağistan, 2010. General situation of beekeeping in the eastern Anatolian region of Turkey and ARIMA model with the help of long-term analysis. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 5 (8): 537-546.

Lafay, G., 1992. The measurement of revealed comparative advantages. In: Dagenais, M.G. and Muet, P.A. (eds), International Trade Modeling, Chapman & Hill, London.

Liesner, H.H., 1958. The European Common Market and British industry. Economic Journal, 68: 302-316.

Lyfor, C.P. and J. M. Welch, 2004. Measuring competition for textiles: does the U.S make the grade. Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting in Tulsa, Oklahoma, February 18, U.S.

Mushanyuri, B.E. and M. Mzumara, 2013. An assessment of comparative advantage of Mauritius. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2 (3): 35-42.

Ören, N., T. Alemdar, O. Parlakay, H. Yılmaz, A. Seçer, C. Güngör, B. Yaşar and B. Gürer, 2010. An economic analysis of beekeeping activities in Adana. Agricultural Economic and Policy Development Instıtute, Publication no: 178 Ankara, Turkey.

Peker, A.E., 2015. Turkey cereals and Baklagil Sector of the substance competitive power against the European Union market. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal, 5 (2): 1-20.

Pilinkiene, V., 2014. Evaluation of international competitiveness using the revealed comparative advantage indices: The case of the Baltic States. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (13): 353-359.

RTMFAL, 2017 Republic of Turkey Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock. http://www.tarim.gov.tr/sgb/Belgeler/SagMenuVeriler/HAYGEM.pdf (09.03.2017)

Saner, G., B. Yücel, M. Yercan, B. Karaturhan, S. Engindeniz, F. Çukur, and M. Köseoğlu, 2011. A Research on the Technical and Economic Development of Organic and Conventional Honey Production and the Determination of Alternative Market Possibilities: A Case Study İzmir and Kemalpaşa Province. Agricultural Economic and Policy Development Instıtute, Publication no: 195 Ankara, Turkey.

Startiene, G. and R. Remeikiene, 2014. Evaluation of revealed comparative advantage of Lithuanian industry in global markets. Procedia, 110: 428-438.

Tao, Y. and X. Fu, 2007. China’s textile ındustry international competitive advantage and policy suggestion. Business and Public Administration Studies, 2 (1): 84-97.

Torok, A. and A. Jambor, 2016. Determinants of the revealed comparative advantages: The case of the European ham trade.

Agric. Econ.–Czech, 62 (10): 471-481.

Ullah, M.S. and I. Kazuo, 2013. Dynamics of comparative advantage and export potentials in Bangladesh. The Ritsumeikan Economic Review, 61 (4): 471-484.

Uysal, H., G. Saner, E. Atış, S. Gümüş and S. Karabat, 2016. Competitiveness of Turkey in the European Union wine market. Nevsehir Journal of Science and Technology, 5 (private issue): 144-149.

Vural, H., 2008. Honey production and marketing in Turkey. 1th International Muğla Beekeeping and Pine Honey Congress, 2527 November, Muğla, Turkey.

Widodo, T., 2008. Dynamic changes in comparative advantage: Japan “fl ying geese” model and its implications for China. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 1 (3):

-213.

Yıldırım, İ. and S. Ağar, 2008. The infl uence of scale on the profi tability of honey beekeeping enterprise in eastern part of Turkey. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 3 (5): 314-320.

Downloads

Published

28.02.2018

Issue

Section

Agricultural Economics and Management

How to Cite

TERİN, M., YILDIRIM, İBRAHIM, AKSOY, A., & MUHAMMED SARI, M. (2018). COMPETITION POWER OF TURKEY’S HONEY EXPORT AND COMPARISON WITH BALKAN COUNTRIES. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 24(1), 17-22. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/4760