OPPORTUNITIES TO IMPROVE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF MANURE LITTER IN POULTRY FARMS: 1. APPLICATION OF BACTERIAL-ENZYMATIC ADDITIVE IN LAYING HENS

Authors

  • V. Vasilev Agricultural Institute – Stara Zagora Author
  • E. Videv Agricultural Institute – Stara Zagora Author

Keywords:

laying hens, manure litter, treatment, bacterial-enzymatic additive

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish the values of pH, moisture, nitrogen (NH4
+ -N; NO3
-
 N; and
total N) and total carbon in the laying hens manure litter (LHML), treated by bacterial-enzymatic
product Micropan® Normal (Eurovix, Italy). The study has been carried out at the poultry farm of
the Agricultural institute – Stara Zagora for a period of 61 days, when the last sample was taken. The
treatment was done at the days 1, 15, 29, 40 and 54 of the experiment. The composite samples for the
purposes of laboratory analysis were taken at days 8, 12, 19, 26, 33, 40, 50, 54 and 61 of the experiment.
It was established that there were no significant differences between the experimental samples (ES)
and control samples (CS) average values of the pH (8.68 ± 0.23 and 8.75 ± 0.12, respectively). The
moisture of the ES decreased significantly (P < 0.001) by 35.4% in comparison with CS. The NH4
+
-N concentrations and the NH4
+ -N:total N ratio in the treated LHML decreased by 15.6% (n.s.; P =
0,128) and 34,6% (P < 0.01), respectively, whereas the treatment had no significant effect on the NO3
-
N concentrations. After day 19 the concentration of NH4
+ -N in treated litter decreased significantly
(P = 0.012) by 28.51%. There were significant increases in the percentages of the total N and total C in
the treated LHML by 35.03% (P < 0.01) and 31.34% (P < 0.001), respectively. The C:N ratio was 8.46 ±
0.60 and 8.64 ± 0.52 for ES and CS, respectively, with no significant differences.

References

Arogo, J., P. W. Westerman, A. J. Heber, W. P. Robarge, J. J. Classen, 2001. Ammonia emissions – A review. ASAE paper No. 014089.

Beker, A., S. L. Vanhooser, J. H. Swartzlander, R. G. Teeter, 2004. Atmospheric ammonia concentration effects on broiler growth and performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 13: 5-9

Carlile, F. S., 1984. Ammonia in poultry houses: A literature review. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 40(2): 99-113

Chadwick, D. R., B. F. Pain, S. K. E. Brookman, 2000. Nitrous oxide and methane emissions following application of animal manures to grassland. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29, 277-287

Elliot, H. A., N. E. Collins, 1983. Chemical methods for controlling ammonia release from poultry manure. ASAE, paper 83-4521, p. 17.

Groot Koerkamp, P. W. G., J. H. M. Metz, G. H. Uenk, V. R. Phillips, M. R. Holden, R. W. Sneath, J. L. Short, R. P. White, J. Hartung, J. Seedorf, M. Schroder, K. H. Linkert, S. Pedersen, H. Takai, J. O. Johnsen, C. M. Wathes, 1998. Concentration and emission of ammonia in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 70: 79-85

Groot Koerkamp, P. W. G., 1994. Review on emissions of ammonia from housing systems for laying hens in relation to sources, processes, building design and manure handling. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 59, 73-87

Hartung, J., 1990. Influence of housing and livestock on ammonia release from buildings. In: Odour and Ammonia Emissions from Livestock Farming, eds. V. C. Nielsen, J. H. Voorburg and P. L’Hermite. The Netherlands: Elsevier Applied Science.

Kostadinova, G., D. Dermendzhieva, R. Stefanova, 2015. Agro-ecological assessment of layer hens’ manure and litter. Journal of Animal Science, 3, 42-53 (BG)

Kristensen, H. H., C. M. Wathes, 2000. Ammonia and poultry welfare: A review. Worlds Poult. Sci. J., 56: 235-245

Lorimor, J. C., 1998. Ammonia losses from broadcast liquid manure. ASL-R1597, ISU Swine Research Report. AS-640. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.

Moore, P. A., 1998. Best management practices for poultry manure utilization that enhance agricultural productivity and reduce pollution. In: Animal Waste Utilization: Effective Use of Manure as a Soil Resource. Chelsea, Mich.: Ann Arbor Press.

National Chicken Council, 2003. National Chicken Council animal welfare guidelines and audit checklist. Nat. Chicken Counc., Washington, DC.

Oenema, O., A. Bannink, S. G. Sommer, L. Velthof, 2001. Gaseous nitrogen emissions from livestock farming systems. In: Nitrogen in the Environment: Sources, Problems, and Management. R. F. Follet and J. L. Hatfield, ed. Elsevier Publ., New York.

Patterson, P. H., E. S. Lorenz, 1996. Manure nutrient production from commercial white leghorn hens. J. Appl. Poultry Res., 5: 260-268

Ritz, C. W., B. D. Fairchild, M. P. Lacy, 2004. Implications of ammonia production and emissions from commercial poultry facilities: a review. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 13: 684-692

Sims, J. T., D. C. Wolf, 1994. Poultry manure management: Agricultural and environmental issues. Advances Agron., 52: 1-83

Todorova, S., I. Ivanova, 2013. Characteristics of compost obtained by means of a bacterial supplement. Proceedings of “Angel Kanchev” University of Ruse, 52, 10.2, 223-228 (BG)

Vasilev, V., E. Videv, J. Krustanov, 2015. Treatment of dairy manure litter with bacterial-enzymatic bioactivator. Journal of Animal Science, 6, 40-45 (BG)

Wathes, C. M., M. R. Holden, R. W. Sneath, R. P. White, V. R. Phillips, 1997. Concentrations and emission rates of aerial ammonia, nitrous oxide, methane, carbon dioxide, dust and endotoxin in UK broiler and layer houses. British Poultry Science, 38: 14-28

Xin, H., I. L. Berry, 1995. Minimum ventilation requirement and associated energy cost for aerial ammonia control in broiler housing. ASAE Paper No. 95-4483. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE.

Yang, P., J. C. Lorimor, H. Xin, 2000. Nitrogen losses from laying hen manure in commercial high-rise layer facilities. Transactions of the ASAE, 43(6): 1771-1780

Downloads

Published

27.02.2017

How to Cite

Vasilev, V., & Videv, E. (2017). OPPORTUNITIES TO IMPROVE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF MANURE LITTER IN POULTRY FARMS: 1. APPLICATION OF BACTERIAL-ENZYMATIC ADDITIVE IN LAYING HENS. Bulgarian Journal of Animal Husbandry, 54(1), 17-25. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjah/article/view/296