THE EFFECTS OF THE ADDITION OF THE PROBIOTIC “PRIMIX FORSIL” AND THE ADSORBENT “VITACORM REO” ON THE PRODUCTIVITY AND SOME BLOOD PARAMETERS IN GROWING PIGS
Keywords:
young pigs, productivity, probiotic, adsorbent, blood parametersAbstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of the addition of the probiotic “Primix Forsil” and the adsorbent
“Vitacorm REO” into the feed for young pigs, using different schemes based on the morphological and biochemical parameters
of the animal’s blood. The scientific and economic experiment took place at the SE ”Moldsiungibrid”. Forty hybrid gilts of Landrace x Pietrain breed were used as they were separated into 4 groups on the principle of analogy (10 animals in each group). The gilts in the control group were fed the basic ration, while the pigs in the experimental groups were fed a feed supplemented with different substances, namely: the probiotic “Primix Forsil” (0.5 kg/t) – for the pigs in the first group, the adsorbent “Vitacorm REO” (4.0 kg/t) – for the pigs in the second group, and the probiotic “Primix Forsil” and “Vitacorm REO” in equal proportions – for the pigs in the third group. The feed was balanced according to the feeding norms, and modified in compliance with the animals’ age and body weight. The obtained results demonstrated that, the supplementation of the fodders for pigs with the adsorbent “Vitacorm REO” both separately or in combination with the probiotic “Primix Forsil”, had a good influence on the general level of blood protein. At the end of the experiment, the albumin level as well as that of the AST (Aspartate Aminotransferase) in the blood of the pigs in the experimental groups were higher in comparison with that in the pigs in the control group.
References
Antipov, V. A., V. F. Vasilyev and T. G. Kutishcheva, 2007. Mycotoxicosis – an important problem of animal husbandry. Veterinary science. 11: pp. 42-47 (Ru).
Bennet, J. W. and M. Klich, 2003. Mycotoxins. Clinical microbiology. Reviews. V. 16, pp. 497-516.
Gryazneva, T. N., 2005. The utilization of the probiotic Biod-5 in the diets for weaned piglets. Zootechnics. 8, p. 15 (Ru).
Danilevskaya, N. V., M. A. Sidorov and V. V. Subbotin, 2002. Probiotics in veterinary science. Veterinary science, 11 (Ru).
Danilevskaya, N. V., V. V. Subbotin, O. A. Vashurin and Y. V. Pyatysheva, 2003. Pharmaceutical stimulation of the productivity of dairy cows using the probiotic Laktobifadol. Veterinary science, 2 (Ru).
Danilevskaya, N. V., 2006. Materials of the international scientific and practical conference of the Russian Scientific and Research Institute of Experimental Veterinary Medicine of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Moscow, pp. 370-372. (Ru).
Egorov, I., P. Pankov, B. Rozanov et al., 2004. The probiotic laktoamilovarin stimulates the growth of chickens. Poultry farming, 8: 32-33 (Ru).
Egorov I., T. E. Egorova and B. Rozanov, 2012. Vegetable feed additive Biostront 510 for broilers. Poultry farming, 1: 17-20 (Ru).
Ivanov, A. V., M. Y. Tremasov, K. H. Papunidi et al., 2010. Methodical recommendations on the prevention of mycotoxicosis in animals. Moscow, pp. 114. (Ru).
Kalashnikov, A. P., V. I. Fisinin et al., 2003. Feeding norms and diets for farm animals. In: A. P. Kalashnikov, Feeding norms and diets for farm animals, Moscow, 456 pp. (Ru).
Malik, N. I. and A. N. Panin, 2006. Probiotics: theoretical and practical aspects. Veterinary science of farm animals, 6: 48-50 (Ru).
Yushchuk, N. D. and L. E. Brodov, 2001. Severe intestinal infections: diagnostics and treatment. Medicine, Moscow, 304 pp. (Ru).
Fuller R., 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. V. 5, 66: 365-378 (En).
Ovsyannikov, A. I., 1976. Basics of experimental work in animal husbandry. Moscow. (Ru).
Pavlov, D. S., I. A. Egorov, R. V. Nekrasov, K. S. Laktionov, L. Z. Kravtsova, V. G. Pravdin and N. A. Ushakov, 2011. Use of biologically active feed additives in order to increase of nutritious properties of mixed fodders and to increase the norms of the supplementation of mixed fodders with oil meal and concentrated feed. Problems of biology of productive animals, 1: 89-92 (Ru).
Panin, A. N., 2008. Probiotics – an integral component of rational feeding of animals. Poultry and poultry products, 3: 13-16 (Ru).
Plokhinsky, N. A., 1969. Manual on biometrics for livestock specialists. Kolos, Moscow, 225 pp (Ru).
Simon, O., A. Jadamus and W. Vahjen, 2001. Probiotic feed additives – effectiveness and expected modes of action. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. Vol. 10: 51–67.
Subbotin, V. V. and N. V. Danilevskaya, 2006. Utilization of the probiotic preparation Laktobifadol in poultry farming and animal industry (Ru).
Tmenov, I. and B. Vaniyeva, 2013. Diets supplemented with the additive Gidrolaktiv in combination with the antioxidant Epofen. Feeding, fodders and their components.
http://www.webpticeprom.ru visited on 09.08.2015 (Ru).
Traian Stan., 1992. Tehnologiia creşterii suinelor. Iaşi, 363 pp. (Ro).
Tremasov, M. Y., 2005. Mycotoxicoses - the problem of their spread and prevention in animal husbandry. In: Materials of the Russian scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 45th anniversary of the Russian Scientific and Research Veterinary Institute, April 14-15. - Kazan, pp. 41-51 (Ru).
Walker, R. and M. Buckley, 2006. Probiotic microbes: the scientific basis. A report of the American Academy of Microbiology, 22 р. http://www.antibiotic.ru (Ru).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
