THE ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE LOSSES OF COW MILK DUE TO MASTITIS: A META-ANALYSIS

Authors

  • J. Kvapilik Institute of Animal Science, Prague – Uhrineves, Czech Republic Author
  • J. Syrucek Institute of Animal Science, Prague – Uhrineves, Czech Republic Author
  • O. Hanus Dairy Research Institute Ltd., Prague 6 – Vokovice, Czech Republic Author
  • M. Vyletelova-Klimesova Dairy Research Institute Ltd., Prague 6 – Vokovice, Czech Republic Author
  • P. Roubal Dairy Research Institute Ltd., Prague 6 – Vokovice, Czech Republic Author

Keywords:

cow, milk losses, percentage of infectious animals, somatic cell count, total count of microorganisms, fat and protein losses, losses of milk quality, dairy cow reproduction performance losses

Abstract

Reducing the incidence of mastitis is measure aimed at increasing the quality of milk and dairy products. Effective economic
argument for mastitis losses could contribute to promoting the prevention of this disease. According to literature data
and model calculations the aim was to: - highlight the incidence of mastitis in cow herds; - analyze production losses caused
by mastitis; - generalize the obtained knowledge. Relevant literature data (A) and two published data sets (B1 and B2) were
statistically analyzed by method of meta-analysis. In addition to the milk losses also next economically important indicators
were observed: - % of infectious animals; - somatic cell count (SCC ) in milk; - the total count of microorganisms (TC M); - fat
content (F); - protein content (P); - selected indicators of reproduction. Relationship between SCC and decrease in milk production
showed correlation 0.775 (P<0.01). SCC increase by 100 103.ml–1 results in a decrease in production (regression coefficient
b=1.82) by 2.0% and vice versa. Relationship between SCC and lower milk production due to mastitis showed correlation
0.832(P<0.01).With the increase in SCC by 100 103.ml–1 the production is reduced by 51 kg per cow and lactation on average
(b =0.511). Relations between SCC and other indicators were significant (P<0.01; B1 and B2).SCC increasing by 10 103.ml–1-
resulted in reduction of F and P by 0.034 and 0.015% and TC M increase by 1.77 103.ml–1 and decrease of F and P by 0.022 and
0.015% and TC M increase by 0.26 103.ml–1

References

Ali, A. and G. E. Shook, 1980. An optimum transformation for somatic cells concentration in milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 63: 487-490.

Benda, P., M. Vyletělová and A. Ticháček, 1997. A method of prevalence estimation of intramammary Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae infection in herds by examination of bulk milk samples. Czech Vet. Med., 42 (4): 101-109.

Blowey, B. and P. Edmondson, 1995. Mastitis control in dairy herds. In: An illustrated and practical guide. Miller Fremann Professional Ltd, Wharfedale Road, Ipswich IP 1 4LG, United Kingdom.

Blowey, R., and P. Edmondson, 2010. Somatic cell Count. In: Mastitis Control in Dairy Herds. Blowey, R. and P. Edmondson(Eds.) CAB International, UK: pp. 152-170.

Brinkmann, J. and C. Winckler, 2005. Status quo der Tiergesundheitssituation in der ökologischen Milchviehhaltung – Mastitis, Lahmheiten, Stoffwechselstörungen. In: Beiträge zur 8. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau. Univ. press Kassel: pp. 343-346.

Bunch, K. J., D. J. S. Heneghan, K. G. Hibbitt and G. J. Rowlands, 1984. Genetic influences on clinical mastitis and its relationship with milk yield, season and stage of lactation. In: Agricultural Research Council, institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire Gt. Britain, Liv. Prod. Sci., DOI:10.1016/0301-6226(84)90011-3.

Crist, W. L., R. J. Harmon, J. O’Leary and A. J. McAllister, 1997. Mastitis and its control. In: University of Kentucky, ASC -140.

Current Concepts of Bovine Mastitis, 1996. In: National Mastitis Council.

CSN 57 0529, 1993. Raw cow milk for dairy factory treatment and processing. Prague, CNI.

Deutsche Veterinärmedizinische Gesellschaft, 2012. Leitlinien zur Bekämpfung der Mastitis des Rindes als Herdenproblem. In: Sachverständigenausschuss: „Subklinische Mastitis“. DVG, Giessen.

Dyson R., 2013. Cost of clinical mastitis dramatically increases. In: Dairy Australia. http://www.petalia.com.au/Templates/StoryTemplate_Process.cfm?specie=Dairy&story_no=2103

Elite Magazin für Milcherzeuger, 2009. Euterkranke Kühe nicht besamen! http://www.elite-magazin.de/

Erskine, R. J., 2011. Mastitis in Cattle. In: The Merck Manuals.

Esslemont R. J. and M. A. Kossaibati, 1997. Culling in 50 dairy herds in England. Vet. Rec., 140: 36-39.

Exner, U., 2009. Mastitis wirkungsvoll behandeln. In: Eutergesundheit – Chancen in der Krise. Rinder-Gesundheitstag, Giessen, 18: 32-35.

Fehlings K., 2013. Ökonomischer und gesundheitlicher Schaden durch Eutererkrankungen. Der praktische Tierarzt, 94 (Suppl. 6): 4–9.

Firat, M. Z., 1993. An investigation into the effects of clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. Liv. Prod. Sci., 36 (4): 311-321.

Fleischer, P., M. Metzner, M. Beyerbach et al., 2011. The relationship between milk yield and the incidence of some diseases in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 84: 2025-2035.

Foss, 2002. Somatic Cell Counting. In: The way to control Mastitis and improve dairy product quality. FOSS Electric A/S, Hilleroed, Denmark. http://bongardscheese.com/dsiweb/9.pdf

Frago, F., A. Ahmadzadeh, B. Shafii, J. C. Dalton, M. A. McGuire and W. J. Price, 2004. Effect of clinical mastitis and other diseases on reproductive performance of Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci., 87 (Sppl. 1): 258.

Fürst, D., 2010. Sind schöne Euter auch gesund? In: ZuchtDoto, Flechvieh Austria: pp. 4-5.

Green, M. J., H. A. Leach, J. E. Breen et al., 2007. National intervention study of mastitis control in dairy herds in England and Wales. Vet. Rec., 160: 287-293.

Gruis, D., K. Matthes and P. Katharina, 2004. Remontierung erfolgreich managen. In: Berichte aus der Praxis. Deuka Düsseldorf, 2004.

Hachenberg, S., 2013. Managementwerkzeuge für das Eutergesundheitsmonitoring in Milchviehherden. In: 32. wissenschaftliche Fachtagung, Güstrow. http://www.lkv-mv.de/

Hanuš, O. and B. Suchánek, 1991. Variability and somatic cell counts in cow´s milk as influenced by some internal and external factors. Živoc. Výr. / Czech J. Anim. Sci., 36 (4): 303-311.

Harms, J., 2013. Betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte zur Eutergesundheit und Vorstellung eines neuen Forschungsprojektes. www.lkv-mv.de/formulare/AMS_2_Feb2013.pdf

Harms, J., 2009. Ökonomische und produktionstechnische Analyse der Milchproduktion und Färsenaufzucht. In: Landesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Fischerei Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Jahresbericht, Forschungsnummer 1/18.

Heber, I., 2013. Investitionen in die Tiergesundheit…. was darf sie kosten? In: Sächsischer Milchrindtag, Groitzsch. http://www.landwirtschaft.sachsen.de/landwirtschaft/download/Ingo_Heber.pdf

Jahnke, B., J. Wolf and E. Kobus, 2002. Sicherung einer guten Fruchtbarkeit in Hochleistungsherden. In: Forschungsbericht Nr. 30/04/31/96/01. Institut fuer Tierproduktion Dummerstorf.

Jones, G. M., 2009. Guidelines to Culling Cows with Mastitis. In: Milk Quality & Milking Management, Virginia Tech.

Jones, G. M. and T. L. Bailey, 2009. Understanding the basics of mastitis. In: Virginia Cooperative Extension: 1-5: 404-233.

Juozaitiene, V., A. Zakas and A. Juozaitis, 2004. Relationship of somatic cell count with milk yield and composition in the herds of Black and White cattle. Med. Weter., 60: 701-704.

Kelton, D., C. Petersson, K. Leslie and D. Hansen, 2001. Associations between clinical mastitis and pregnancy on Ontario dairy farms. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality: pp. 200-202.

Klaas, I., U. Wessels, H. Rothfub and E. Schallenberger, 1999. Fruchtbarkeitsstörungen und Mastitis. Bauernblatt,20: 46-47.

Kopunecz, P., 2014. Survey of purchased milk quality results for 2013. In: CMSC H, a.s. http://www.cmsch.cz/prehledy-vysledku-kvality-nakupovaneho-mleka-za-rok-2013/

Krömker, V., 2010. Gesunde Euter – gesunde Milch. Eutergesundheit – Massnahmen zur Mastitisbekämpfung. In: Intervet Deutschland GmbH, 35.

Krömker, V. and F. Pfannenschmidt, 2005. Zur Inzidenz klinischer Mastitiden und ihrer Therapie in Milchviehbetrieben des ökologischen Landbaus. In: Poster presented at 8. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau - Ende der Nische, Kassel.

KU, 2014. Results of milk recording 2012 – 2013. In: Results of milk recording. Annual CMSC H, a.s.

Kudi, A. C., M. P. Bray and A. T. Niba, 2009. Mastitis causing pathogens within the dairy cattle environment. Faculty of Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL 4 8AA, United Kingdom. Int. J. Biol., 1(1): January 2009.

Kvapilík, J. and J. Syrùcek, 2013. Somatic cell count and other milk quality indicators. Mlékarské listy, 24 (137): 10-15.

Lacy-Hulbert, J., B. Franks, D. Hawkins, et al., 2006. The cost of mastitis. In: Dairy insight research 2005/2006, Final Report.

LKV, 2014. Gesundheitsmonitoring Rind in Baden-Württemberg. In: Zucht- und Herdenmanagement mit gesünderen Tieren. http://www.lkvbw.de/lkv_gmon.html

Downloads

Published

31.12.2014

How to Cite

Kvapilik , J., Syrucek , J., Hanus , O., Vyletelova-Klimesova , M., & Roubal , P. (2014). THE ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE LOSSES OF COW MILK DUE TO MASTITIS: A META-ANALYSIS. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 20(6), 1483-1493. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/6433