STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND OTHER PATHOGENS IN RELATION TO BREED OF CATTLE AND SOMATIC CELL COUNT

Authors

  • M. Vyletelova-Klimesova Dairy Research Institute, Ke Dvoru 12a, Prague, Czech Republic Author
  • O. Hanus Dairy Research Institute, Ke Dvoru 12a, Prague, Czech Republic Author
  • A. Dufek Agriresearch Rapotín, Výzkumníků 267, Vikýřovice, Czech Republic Author
  • I. Nemeckova Dairy Research Institute, Ke Dvoru 12a, Prague, Czech Republic Author
  • J. Horacek Agritec Plant Research, Zemědělská 16, Šumperk, Czech Republic Author
  • A. Ponizil Agritec Plant Research, Zemědělská 16, Šumperk, Czech Republic Author
  • L. Nejeschlebova Agritec Plant Research, Zemědělská 16, Šumperk, Czech Republic Author

Keywords:

raw milk, Holstein, Czech Fleckvieh, pathogens, somatic cell count

Abstract

Influence of breed on somatic cell count (SCC) and occurrence of particular species was evaluated. The samples were collected
from farms with Holstein (H; 10 farms - 365 cows) breeding and from farms with Czech Fleckvieh (CF; 2 farms - 67
cows). The obtained dataset was statisticaly evaluated by analysis of variance. The occurrence of pathogens was compared
between H and CF. The relationship between SCC and incidence of pathogens was determined as well. It is evident that more
positive cows were in breed H compared to CF (H 41.6%; CF 26.9%). The most frequent pathogens in H breed were S. aureus
(13.7%), S. uberis (9.6%), S. haemolyticus (8.5%), S. agalactiae (6.9%), E. faecalis (2.5%) and E. faecium (0.8%), while only S.
uberis (19.4%), S. haemolyticus (6%) and S. aureus (1.5%) were found in CF. SCC results showed the higher SCC in H breed
in case of both negative and positive cows as well and significant impact of breed on logSCC (F = 6.4, P = 0.012). The significant
effects of bacterial species were confirmed (F = 13.6, P < 0.001). Multiple comparison among groups of bacterial species
showed significant differences between negative and S. aureus, S. agalactiae, S. uberis (P = 0.012, P < 0.001, P < 0.001). Differences
between negative and other pathogens were not signifiant.

References

Ali, A. and G. E. Shook, 1980. An optimum transformation for somatic cells concentration in milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 63: 487-490.

Benda, P., M. Vyletělová and A. Ticháček, 1997. A method of prevalence estimation of intramammary Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae infection in herds by examination of bulk milk samples. Veterinary Medicine – Czech, 42: 101-109.

Boşgelmez-Tinaz, G., S. Ulusoy, B. Aridogan and F. Coskun-Ari, 2006. Evaluation of different methods to detect oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and their clinical laboratory utility. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 25: 410-412.

Bradley, A. J., 2002. Bovine mastitis: An evolving disease. Veterinary Journal, 163: 1-13.

Caraviello, D. Z., 2004. Selection for clinical mastitis and somatic cell count. Reproduction and Genetics 613. The Babcock Institute for International Dairy Research and Development, University of Wisconsin-Madison, pp. 1-6.

CSN 57 0529:1993. Raw cow milk (in Czech), Czech Standards Institute Prague, 1993.

Eding, H., Y. de Haas and G. de Jong, 2009. Predicting mastitis resistance breeding values for somatic cell count indicator traits. In: Proceedings of the Interbull Meeting, 40, Barcelona-Spain, 2009, pp. 21-25.

Genčurová, V., O. Hanuš, B. Gabriel and I. Žváčková, 1993. Somatic cell count in milk in relation to some breeding factors. Czech Journal of Animal Science, AUT HOR 1!!! Volume???: 359-361.

Hanuš, O. and A. Ticháček, 1997. Analysis of milking technique effect on somatic cell counts. Stočarstvo Animal Husbandry, 51: 121-128.

Hanuš, O., I. Žváčková, V. Genčurová and B. Gabriel, 1992. A relationship between milk lactose content and indicators of the mammary gland health in the first third of lactation. Veterinary Medicine - Czech, 37: 595-604.

Kalmus, P., B. Aasmäe, A. Kärssin, T. Orro and K. Kask, 2001. Udder pathogens and their resistance to antimicrobial agents in dairy cows in Estonia. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 53: 4.

Kvapilík, J., Z. Růžička and P. Bucek, 2012. Annual. Cattle breeding in Czech Republic. Main results and indicators for 2011. Prague. Czech-Moravia Breeders Association, pp. 30-44.

Le Blanc, D. M., E. M. Reece, J. B. Horton and J. E. Janis, 2007. Increasing incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hand infections: a 3-year county hospital experience. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 119: 935-40.

Martineau, F., F. J. Picard, P. H. Roy, M. Ouellette and M. G. Bergeron, 1988. Species-specific and ubiquitous-DNA-based assays for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 36: 618-623.

Nóbrega, D. B. and H. Langoni, 2011. Breed and season influence on milk quality parameters and in mastitis occurrence. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 31: 1045-1052.

Orbán, M., K. K. Gaál, F. Pajor, A. Szentléleki, P. Póti, J. Tőzsér and L. Gulyás, 2011. Effect of temperament of Jersey and Holstein Friesian cows on milk production traits and somatic cell count. Archiv für Tierzucht, 54: 594-599.

Pitkälä, A., M. Haveri, S. Pyörälä, V. Myllys and T. Honkanen-Buzalski, 2004. Bovine mastitis in Finland 2001 - prevalence, distribution of bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance. Journal of Dairy Science, 87: 2433-2441.

Reneau, J. K., R. D. Appleman, G. R. Steuernagel and J. W. Mudge, 1988. Somatic cell count. An effective tool in controlling mastitis. Agricultural Extension Service, University of Minnesota, AG-FO-0447.

Ryan, D. P., 1993. Cell count interpretation. IDF Mastitis Newsletter, 134: 12-15.

Schroeder, J. W., 2012a. Bovine Mastitis and Milk Management. Mastitis Control Programs. North Dakota State University, Extension Service. AS1129, 2012, pp. 1-16.

Schroeder, J. W., 2012b. Troubleshooting a Mastitis Problem Herd. North Dakota State University, Extension Service. AS 1128, pp. 1-8.

Schroeder, J. W., 2012c. Proper milking techniques. North Dakota State University, Extension Service AS1126, pp. 1-2.

Shook, G. E., 2001. Breeding, Selection and Somatic Cell Counts: Where Are We Today? National Mastitis Council, Annual Meeting Proceedings, pp. 113-127.

Shook, G. E., 1982. Approaches to summarizing somatic cell count which improve interpretability. National Mastitis Council, Louisville, Kentucky, pp. 1−17.

Ticháček, A., M. Bjelka, O. Hanuš, P. Kopunecz, P. Olejník, L. Pavlata, A. Pechová and A. Ponížil, 2007. Advisory service as safety tool in milk primary production. Agritec Šumperk, 88 pp.

Urioste, J. I., J. Franzen, J. J. Windig and E. Strandberg, 2011. Genetic variability of alternative somatic cell count traits and their relationship with clinical and subclinical mastitis. Stavanger Norway. Interbull Bulletin, 44: 204-209.

Vasilev, N., D. Dinev, Y. Mitev, M. Koleva and Ch. Miteva, 2007. Hygiene status of dairy cows reared in a spacious building and resulting quality of produced milk. Trakia Journal of Science, 5: 47-51.

Vyletělová, M., L. Nejeschlebová and O. Hanuš, 2010. Monitoring of the main mastitis pathogens. Náš chov, 2: 68-71.

Vyletělová, M., O. Hanuš, L. Hasoňová, P. Roubal, I. Manga and L. Nejeschlebová, 2013. Occurrence of mastitis pathogens in relation to somatic cells. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 5: 1505-1511.

Zavadilová, I., J. Wolf, M. Štipková, E. Němcová and J. Jamrozik, 2011. Genetic parameters for somatic cell score in the first three lactations of Czech Holstein and Fleckvieh breeds using a random regression model. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 56: 251-260.

Downloads

Published

31.12.2014

How to Cite

Vyletelova-Klimesova , M., Hanus , O., Dufek , A., Nemeckova , I., Horacek , J., Ponizil, A., & Nejeschlebova , L. (2014). STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND OTHER PATHOGENS IN RELATION TO BREED OF CATTLE AND SOMATIC CELL COUNT. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 20(6), 1477-1482. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/6432