LAND SUITABILITY FOR SPECIFIC CROP RANGES USING DYNAMIC LAND SUITABILITY EVALUATION GUIDELINES FOR SMALL-SCALE COMMUNAL IRRIGATION SCHEMES
Keywords:
dynamic land suitability guidelines, irrigation scheme, specific crop ranges, suitability ratingAbstract
Small-scale communal irrigation schemes that are not top-down managed comprise an important agricultural activity in
many deep rural areas of South Africa. Farmers in these irrigation schemes, rely on basic indigenous knowledge of soil, climate
and empirical observations of crop performance to make crop production decisions. Such knowledge is not sufficient
to make appropriate land use decisions on crop suitability. Land suitability evaluation systems and approaches used in South
Africa are often geared to commercial skilled farmers with better knowledge and technological resources for crop production.
Objective of the study was to assess land suitability for specific crop ranges at Rambuda irrigation scheme using dynamic land
suitability guidelines for small-scale irrigation schemes. The first step in these guidelines is community engagement through
consultations and ensuring community participation in land utilization choices. This is followed by detailed survey of biophysical
resources and assessment by matching land utilization type requirements and tolerances against land characteristics
or qualities of each mapping unit to generate suitability ratings. Results showed that majority of mapping units were well suited
(WS) and suited (S) for majority of specific crop ranges and only mapping unit Ao was marginally suited (MS) for citrus because
of crusting, prone to compaction, crusting and moderate drainage. Dynamic land suitability evaluation guidelines were
successful for assessing land suitability for specific crop ranges at Rambuda irrigations and will have to be tested in other irrigation
schemes under different socio-cultural and biophysical conditions.
References
Beek, K. J., 1981. The selection of soil properties and land qualities relevant to specific land sues in developing countries. Soil Resource Inventories and Development Planning. Proc. of Workshops Soil Res. Inventory Group at Cornell University. Tech. Monograph, USDA, Washington DC, (1).
Davidson, D. A., 1982. The assessment of land use capability. In: P. Natalaya et al. (Eds), ‘LANDAPLAN 1’. Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on Soil, Geology and Landforms: Impact on Land Use Planning in Developing Countries. (Proceeding of symposium: Bangkok, 1982), pp. G2.2-G2.53.
Ellis, F., 1994. Land (site) evaluation for forestry purposes in South Africa. In: South African Forestry Handbook, pp. 107-123.
Eloff, F. and M. C. Laker, 1978. Phosphorus studies on Vaalharts soils. II. The evaluation of method of extraction, by correlation of results with different wheat crop parameters. Agrochemophysica, 10: 19-23.
FAO, 1976. A framework for land evaluation. Soil Bulletin, FAO, Rome, pp. 32.
FAO, 1985. Guidelines: Land evaluation for irrigated agriculture. Soil Bul., FAO, Rome, pp. 55.
Hensley, M. and M. C. Laker, 1981. A proposed integrated procedure for the identification, delineation, evaluation and planning irrigable land. In: Proc. 9th Nat SSSSA Congr. (Proceeding of symposium: Durban, 1981), pp. 15-22.
Hewitt, A. E. and A. Van Wambeke, 1982. Soil, land and site evaluation methods for land use planning. In: P. Natalaya et al. (Eds.). ‘LANDAPLAN 1’. Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on Soil, Geology and Landforms: Impact on Land Use Planning in Developing Countries. (Proceeding of symposium: Bangkok, 1982), pp. G1.1-G1.43.
ISSS-ISRIC-FAO, 1998. World reference base for soil resources. Acco Press, Leuven, Belgium.
Janick, J., R. W. Schery, F. W. Woods and W. W. Tuttan, 1981. Plant science: An introduction to world crops. 3rd ed., W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.
Kees, G., 2005. Hand-held electronic cone penetrometers for measuring soil strength. Technical Report 0524–2837–MTDC. Missoula: U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center.
Laker, M. C., 1982. Dynamic land capability evaluation – A prerequisite for meaningful land use planning. In: P. Natalaya et al. (Eds), ‘LANDAPLAN 1’. Proc 1st Int. Symp. on Soil, Geology and Landforms: Impact on Land Use Planning in Developing Countries. (Proceeding of symposium: Bangkok, 1982), pp. F4.1-F4.11.
Laker, M. C., 2004a. Advances in soil erosion, soil conservation, land suitability evaluation and land use planning research in South Africa, 1978-2003. South African Journal Plant & Soil, 21: 345-368.
Laker, M. C., 2004b. Development of a general strategy for optimizing the efficient use of primary water resources for effective alleviation of rural poverty. WRC Report, Water Research Commission, Pretoria. (KV149/04), pp. 187.
Laker, M. C., 2005. NIRESA visit to small-farmer irrigation sites in East Pondoland, March 16, 2005. Some loose notes/comments. Unpublished report available from: mlaker@telkomsa.net
Laker, M. C., 2012. Personal communication, Emeritus-Professor of Soil Science, University of Pretoria, June 20, 2012.
Nel, D. J. and A. T. P. Bennie, 1984. Soil factors affecting tree growth and root development in a citrus orchard. South African Journal Plant & Soil, 1: 39-47.
Nethononda, L. O., 1996. Participatory land evaluation in developing countries. Proc. SSSSA 8th National Congress, Bloemfontein, pp. 182-187.
Protz, R., 1981. Soil properties important for various tropical crops: Pahang Tenggara master planning study. SMSS Tech. Mon., SCS, USDA, Washington, 1: 187-200.
Rossiter, D. G., 1996. A theoretical framework for land evaluation (with discussion). Geoderma, 72: 165-202.
Scotney, D. M., F. Ellis, R. W. Nott, T. P. Taylor, B. J. Van Niekerk, E. Vester and P. C. Wood, 1987. A system of soil and land capability classification for agriculture in the SATBVC states. Dept. Agric. Pretoria.
Smyth, A. J., 1981. The objectives of soil surveys of various intensities. In: Soil resource inventories for development planning. SMSS Tech. Mon. 1. SCS, Washington, pp. 26-37.
Turner, D. P. and D. M. Scotney, 1993. Annexure 1: Guideline specifications for the assessment of land suitability for irrigation. In: M. J. Copeland (Ed.), A manual for irrigation planning in developing areas. SECIFAS, Pretoria.
Van Averbeke, W. and S. S. Mohamed, 2006. Smallholder farming styles and development policy in South Africa: The case of Dzindi irrigation scheme. Agrekon, 45: 136-157.
Van Averbeke, W., K. A. Juma and T. E. Tshikalange, 2007. Yield response of African leafy vegetables to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium: The case of Brassica rapa L. subsp. chinensis and Solanum retroflexum Dun. Water SA, 33: 355-362.
Van Averbeke, W., 2008. Best management practices for small-scale subsistence farming on selected irrigation schemes and surrounding areas through participatory adaptive research in Limpopo province. WRC Report No. TT344/08. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, pp. 318.
Van Lanen, H., C. A. Van Diepen, G. R. Reids and G. H. J. De Koning, 1992. A comparison of qualitative and quantitative physical land evaluations, using an assessment of the potential sugar-beet growth in the European community. Soil Use & Management, 8: 80-89.
Van Niekerk, B. J., 1983. Development in land capability mapping with particular reference to southern Africa. In: Proc. 10th Nat. SSSSA Congr. East London. Tech. Comm. 180. Dept. Agric. Pretoria, pp. 100-103.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
