Comparison among Clustering in Multivariate Analysis of Triticale Using Agronomical Traits

Authors

  • R. DOGAN Uludag University, Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Gorukle Campus, 16059 Bursa, Turkey Author
  • H. VURAL Uludag University, Agricultural Economic, Faculty of Agriculture, Gorukle Campus, 16059, Bursa, Turkey Author

Keywords:

Breeding, factor analysis, triticale, yield and yield components

Abstract

This research has been done for determining the most suitable triticale genotypes in the triticale sowing duty system of the Marmara Region ecological conditions. 22 triticale genotypes were used in this two years long study, which has, randomize block experimental design with three replications. Data were analyzed by multivariate statistical methods. Regarding the plant height, the genotype no. 23 recorded the highest value; however, the genotype no. 21 recorded the lowest one. The genotype no. 3 recorded the highest spike length; however, the genotype no. 21 recorded the lowest values respectively. The genotype no. 3 recorded the highest value of grain number spike-1. The genotype no. 4 recorded the highest value of 1000 kernel weight. The genotype no. 21 recorded the highest test weight; however, the genotype no. 7 recorded the lowest values respectively. Regarding the grain yield, the genotype no. 13 recorded the highest value (6723 kg ha-1); however, the genotype no. 16 recorded the lowest one (5244 kg ha-1). According to the two years results, the differences between triticale genotypes were found to be statistically sinificant in all components observed. The differences between the years were proved significant in all components. According to the results of factor analysis, triticale genotypes have similar properties significantly. Therefore, more than one major component has not been found. However, it was found one principal component (PC1) by factorial analyses. In addition, twenty-two examined cultivars were separated in two main groups by cluster analyses.

References

Adam, D. and J. T. G. Hwangs, 1999. Predictions intervals, factor analysis models and high-dimensional empirical linear prediction. Theory and Methods, 94 (446): 446-455.

Akgun, I., M. Tosun and S. Sagsoz, 1997a. A research on yield and yield components of some triticale lines and cultivars under Erzurum ecological conditions. J. Agric. College, 28 (1): 103-119.

Akgun, I., M. Kaya and D. Altindal, 2007. Determination of Yield and Yield Components in Some Triticale Lines/Genotypes under Isparta Ecological Conditions. Akdeniz University, Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 20 (2):171-182.

Akulov, A. S., 1988. Variation in Certain Quantitative Traits in Peas Grown Under Different Conditions. Horticultural Abstracts, 58 (No. 9): Abst. No:468.

Alp, A., 2009. Determination of Agricultural Characteristics of Some Released Triticale (XTriticosecale Wittmack) Cultivars under Rainfed Conditions in Diyarbakir. YYU. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 19 (2): 61 – 70.

Anonymous, 2008. Precipitation values for Bursa province. Turkish State Meteorological Service, Climatic Data, Ankara.

Atak, M. and C. Y. Ciftci, 2006. Morphological Characterization of Some Triticale Cultivar and Lines. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12 (1): 101-111.

Barnett, R. D, A. R. Blount, P. L. Pfahler, P. L. Bruckner, D. M. Wesenberg and J. W. Johnson, 2006. Environmental stability and heritability estimates for grain yield and test weight in triticale. J. Appl. Genet., 47 (3): 207-213.

Coplu, N., 2001. Quantitative and cytological analysis at diallel crosses of some triticale genotypes. (Phd Thesis), Uludag University, Agricultural Faculty, Bursa, Turkey.

Erekul, O. and W. Köhn, 2006. Effect of weather and soil conditions on yield components and bread-making quality of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and winter triticale (Triticosecale Wittm) varieties in North-East Germany. J. Agron. Crops Sci., 192: 452-464.

Furan, A. M., I. Demir, S. Yuce, R. R. Akcalican and F. Aykut, 2005. Research on Aegean region Triticale variety development studies and relationships among yield and quality components in the developed variety and lines. J. Fac. Agric. Akdeniz University, 18 (2): 251-256.

Gupta, P. K. and P. M. Priyadarshan, 1982. Triticale: present status and future prospects. Adv. Genet., 21: 255-345.

Hoerlein, A. D. and J. Valentine, 1995. Triticale (x Triticasecale), pp. 186-203. In: Williams LT (Ed.). Cereals and Pseudocereals. Chapman and Hall Press, London.

Jessop, R. S., 1996. Stress tolerance in newer triticales compared to other cereals, p. 419-427. Triticale Today and Tomorrow. Guedes-Pinto E, Darvey N, Canide V (Eds.). Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dorecht, London.

Johnson, R. A. and D. W. Wicherin, 1992. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. 3. Ed., Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs. N.J. 07632, Londra, 521 pp.

Juskiw, P. E, J. H. Helm and D. F. Salmon, 2000 a. Forage yield and quality for monocrops and mixtures of small grain cereals. Crop Sci., 40:138–147.

Juskiw, P. E., J. H. Helm and D. F. Salmon, 2000b. Postheading Biomass Distribution for Monocrops and Mixtures of Small Grain Cereals. Crop Sci., 40: 148-158.

Mergoum, M, J. Ryan, J. P. Shroyer and M. A. Monem, 1992. Potential for adapting triticale in Morocco. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 21 (2): 137-141.

Milvanovic, M., 1993. Investigation of yield and technology traits of grain of the intergenus hybrids triricale (X Triticosecale Wittmack). Review of Research Work, Faculty of Agriculture Belgrade, 38 (2): 71.

Muntzing, A., 1989. Triticale results and problems. Advances in Plant Breeding. Supplement - Journal of Plant Breeding. Verlag Paul Parey. Berlin und Hamburg. p.103.

Mut, Z, S. Albayrak and O. Tongel, 2006. Determination of grain yield and some traits of Triticale (xTtriticosecale Wittmack) lines. J. Agric. Sci., 12 (1): 56-64.

Ozer, E, U. Karadavut and S. Taner, 2005. Determination of grain yield, forage yield and some agronomical characters of Triticale (xTriticosecale Witt.) genotypes with different sowing times and seeding density of Konya region. VI. Field Crops Congress, 5-9 September, Antalya, Turkey, pp. 1127- 1131.

Paksoy, A. H., 2005. Determining of yield and yield traits of some triticale varieties and lines in kahramanmaras conditions. Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences. Department of Field Crops. MSc Thesis.

Pfeiffer, W. H., 1996. Triticale: Potential and research status of a man-made cereal crop, pp. 571- 580. In: Guedes-Pinto H, Darvey N, Carnide VP (Eds.). Triticale: Today and Tomorrow. Dordrecht, Kluwer Acad Publ.

Rao, S. C, S. W. Coleman and J. D. Volesky, 2000. Yield and Quality of Wheat, Triticale, and Elytricum Forage in the Southern Plains. Crop Sci., 40:1308–1312.

Royo, C, J. Voltas and I. Romagosa, 1999. Remobilization of pre-anthesis assimilates to the grain for grain only and dual purpose (forage and grain) Triticale. Agron. J., 91: 312-316.

Steel, R. and J. Torie, 1980. Principles and proceedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 144 pp.

Tosun, M., I. Akgun, S. Sagsoz and M. Taspinar, 2000. Determination of yiel and yield components in some spring triticale genotypes. Ataturk Univ., Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 31 (1): 1-10.

Tumsavas, Z. and E. Aksoy, 2008. Determination of Soil Fertility Conditions of the Brown Forest Great Group Soils. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University, 22 (1): 43-54.

Tosun, M. and S. Sagsoz, 1993. Grain wrinkling in Triticale. Ataturk Univ., Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 24 (1): 202-211.

Unver, S., 1999. Investigation of yield and yield components on some Triticale lines. J. Field Crops Centeral Research Institute, 8 (1-2): 82-92.

Varughese, G, E. E. Sari and O. S. Abdalla, 1986. Two decades of triticale breeding and research at CIMMYT. In proceeding of International Triticale Symposium. Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, Sydney, Australia: Occasional Publication, 24: 148- 169.

Yagbasanlar, T, A.C. Ulger and I. Genc, 1988. A research on yield and yield components of some foreign triticale cultivars under the Cukurova Conditions. Scientific Journal Nature, 3: 1353-1362.

Yanbeyi, S. and I. Sezer, 2006. A research on yield and yield component of some Triticale lines in Samsun ecological conditions. J. Fac. Agric. OMU, 21 (1): 33-39.

Downloads

Published

28.02.2013

How to Cite

DOGAN, R., & VURAL, H. (2013). Comparison among Clustering in Multivariate Analysis of Triticale Using Agronomical Traits. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 19(1), 110-116. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/5813