APPLICATION OF NATURAL ZEOLITES AND MACROPHYTES FOR WATER TREATMENTIN RECIRCULATION AQUACULTURE SYSTEMS

Authors

  • I. SIRAKOV Trakia University, Department of Biology and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, BG – 6014 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria Author
  • K. VELICHKOVA Trakia University, Department of Biology and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, BG – 6014 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria Author
  • S. STOYANOVA Trakia University, Department of Biology and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, BG – 6014 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria Author
  • D. DINEV Trakia University, Department of Biology and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, BG – 6014 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria Author
  • Y. STAYKOV Trakia University, Department of Biology and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, BG – 6014 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

Elodea, Lemna, RAS, water treatment, zeolite

Abstract

The macrophytes enrich the water with oxygen and help to remove nutrients. The zeolite is also a natural way to combat pollution. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness in waste water treatment process in RAS, applying filter with natural zeolites and macrophytic plants from genus Lemna and Elodea. The temperature and pH were measured daily with a portable combined meter in the newly constructed control and experimental RAS. Ammonium, nitrite, nitrate, total nitrogen and phosphor us were measured spectrophotometrically. At the end of the trial the fish were weighed and specific growth rate and FCR (feed conversion ratio) were calculated. The addition of zeolite and macrophytic plants as a part of filtration system of experimental RAS, decreased significantly the quantity of nitrogen and phosphorus compounds, compared to their amount in conventional one. The better water quality in experimental system, due to the presence in the filter of zeolites and macrophytic plants, influenced positively the growth of rainbow trout and feed utilization.

References

Aiyuk, S., H. Xu, V. Haandel and W. Verstraete, 2004. Removal of Ammonium Nitrogen from Pretreated Domestic Sewage using a Natural Ion Exchanger. Environmental Technology, 25: 1321–1330.

Alabaster, J. and R. Lloyd. 1980. Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Fish. FAO, United Nations, Butterworth, London, pp. 297.

Ariyaratne, M., 2010. Potential of duckweed (Wolf fi aarrhiza) – an invasive aquatic plant as fi sh feed in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry rearing. Pakistan Journal of Weed Sciences Research, 16 (3): 321–333.

Bishop, P. and T. Eighmy, 1989. Aquatic wastewater treatment using Elodea nuttallii. Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 61: 641–648.

Bower, C. and D. Turner, 1982. Ammonia removal by clinoptilolite in the transport of ornamental freshwater fi shes. Progress in Fish-Culture, 4 (1): 19–23.

Boyd, C. E. and J. Queiroz, 1997. Aquaculture pond effl uent management. Aquaculture Asia, 4 (6): 43–46.

Cao, T., L. Ni and X. Ping, 2004. Acute Biochemical Responses of a Submersed Macrophyte, Potamogeton crispus L., to High Ammonium in an Aquarium Experiment. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 19 (2): 279–284.

Chan, T. Y., 2003. Ammonia Removal in Wastewater with Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation Process. Master’s Thesis, Concordia University, 1–12.

Emadi, H., J. E. Nezhad and H. Pourbagher, 2001. In vitro comparison of zeolite (clinoptilolite) and activated carbon as ammonia absorbents in fi sh culture. Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly, 24: 1–2.

Ferdoushi, Z., F. Haque, S. Khan and M. Haque, 2008. The Effects of two Aquatic Floating Macrophytes (Lemna and Azolla) as Biofi lters of Nitrogen and Phosphate in Fish Ponds. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 8: 253–258.

Goulet, T., C. Cook and D. Goulet, 2005. Effect of elevated temperature and light levels on the photosynthesis of different host-symbiont combinations in the Aiptasia pallida/ Symbiodinium symbiosis. Limnology and Oceanography, 50: 1490–1498.

Helfrich, L. and G. Libey, 1990. Fish farming in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). Department of Fisheries and Wild life Sciences. Virginia Tech., pp. 19.

Hodgson, G. L., 1970. Effects of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Lemna minor, under Conditions of Natural Daylight. Annals of Botany, 34 (2): 365–381.

Jordanov, D., B. Kitanov and S. Valev, 1963. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Bulgaricae, Sofi a, Acad. Press., 422 pp. (Bg). Kronzucker, H. J., M. Y. Siddiqiand A. Glass, 1997. Coniferroot discrimination against soil nitrate and the ecology of forest succession. Nature, 385:59–61.

Krupová, Z., M. Oravcová, E. Krupa and D. Peškovičová, 2008. Methods for calculating economic weights of important traits in sheep. Review article. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 41: 24–29.

Lloyd, R., 1992. Pollution and Freshwater Fish. Fishing News Books.

Lloyd, R. and D. Jordan, 1964. Some factors affecting the resistance of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdnerii richardson) to acid waters. Air and Water Pollution, 8: 393–403.

Marking, L. and T. Bills, 1982. Factors affecting the effi ciency of clinoptilolite for removing ammonia from water. The Progressive. Fish-Culturist, 44: 187–189.

Mkandawire, M. and E. Dudel, 2007. Are Lemna spp. effective phytoremediation agents? Bioremediation, Biodeversity and bioavailability, 1 (1): 56–71.

Mazeikiene, A., M. Valentukeviciene, M. Rimeika, A. Matuzevicius and R. Dauknys, 2008. Removal of nitrates and ammonium ions from water using sorbent zeolite (clinoptilolite). Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 16 (1): 38–44.

Nimptsch, J. and S. Pfl ugmacher, 2007. Ammonia triggers the promotion of oxidative stress in the aquatic macrophyte Myriophyllum mattogrossense. Chemosphere, 66 (4): 708– 714.

Pak, D., W. Chang and S. Hong, 2002. Use of natural zeolite to enhance nitrifi cation in biofi lter. Environmental technology, 23: 791–798.

Rakocy, J. E. and R. Allison, 1984. Evaluation of a closed recirculating system for the culture of tilapia and aquatic macrophytes. Bio-engineering symposium for fi sh culture, 1: 296–307.

Raleigh, R., T. Hickman, R. Solomon and P. Nelson, 1984. Habitat suitability information: rainbow trout. Fish and wildlife service, pp. 54.

Sakedevan, K. and H. Bavor, 1998. Phosphorus adsorption characteristic of soils and zeolite to be used as substrates in constructed wetland systems. Water Research, 32: 393–399.

Schulz, C., J. Gelbrecht and B. Rennert, 2003. Treatment of rainbow trout farm effl uents inconstructed wetland with emergent plants and subsurface horizontal water flow.

Aquaculture, 217: 207–221.

Silapajarn, O., K. Silapajarn and C. Boyd, 2006. Evaluation of zeolite products used for aquaculture in Thailand. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 37(1): 136–138.

Staykov, Y., 2001. Aquaculture. Kabri, pp. 173 (Bg).

Stout, L. and K. Nusslein, 2005. Shifts in rhizoplane community’s of aquatic plants after cadmium exposure.Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71: 2484–2492.

Tucker, C., 1993. Water Analysis. In: M.K. Stoskopf (Editor), Fish Medicine, Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp. 166197.

Velichkova, K. and I. Sirakov, 2013. The Usage of Aquatic Floating Macrophytes (Lemna and Wolffi a) as Biofi lter in Recirculation Aquaculture System (RAS). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 13: 101–110.

Wagner, E., T. Jeppsen, R. Arndt, M. Routledge and Q. Bradwisch, 1997. Effects of rearingdesity upon cutthroat trout hematology, hatchery performance, fi n erosionand general health and condition. The Progressive Fish-Culturist, 59, 173–187.

Wang, Q., Y. Cui and Y. Dong, 2002. Phytoremediation of polluted waters potentials and prospects of wetland plants. Acta Biotechnologica, 22, 199–208.

Wang, C., S. Zhang, P. Wang, J. Hou, W. Li and W. Zhang, 2008. Metabolic adaptations to ammonia-induced oxidative stress in leaves of the submerged macrophyte Vallis nerianatans (Lour.) Hara. Aquatic Toxicology, 87 (2): 88–98. Zaikov, A., 2006. Aquaculture. pp. 376 (Bg).

Downloads

Published

30.12.2015

How to Cite

SIRAKOV, I., VELICHKOVA, K., STOYANOVA, S., DINEV, D., & STAYKOV, Y. (2015). APPLICATION OF NATURAL ZEOLITES AND MACROPHYTES FOR WATER TREATMENTIN RECIRCULATION AQUACULTURE SYSTEMS. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 21(Supplement 1), 147-153. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/5620