NET FARM INCOME AS REFLECTION OF CRITICAL LAND EVALUATION IN WELANG WATERSHED, INDONESIA

Authors

  • MAROETO Sebelas Maret University, Doctoral Programs Faculty of Agriculture, Central Java, 57126, Indonesia Author
  • WONGSO ATMOJO SUNTORO Sebelas Maret University, Departement of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Central Java, 57126, Indonesia Author
  • SUTRISNO DJOKO Sebelas Maret University, Departement of Agriculture Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Central Java, 57126, Indonesia Author
  • PRIYADHARSHINI ROSSYDA University of Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran”, Departement of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, East Java, 60294, Indonesia Author

Abstract

Agriculture activities in Indonesia is currently faced with many dynamic changes and environmental developments and fundamental issues such as population growth and market demand bring about deforestation or conversion of forests toward coffee plant that finally degrade the quality of watershed function. Watershed in several zone of Indonesia are run into environmental degradation especially land resources lead up critical land. Critical land conditions get impact toward soil productivity decreased and finally farming had been economics losses. As is it known that farm declared loss if total of cost larger than revenue in calculated of farm analysis. The purpose of this research is to determine the profile of the criticality of the highlands of Welang watershed and know the area which has the highest profit in the cultivation of coffee. Sample a coffee grower 60 spread of at Purwodadi, Prigen and Tutur District, Pasuruan, East Java. Data analysis technique used is the calculation of farm analysis and statistical tests using One Way Anova and supported by Geographic Information System (GIS) spatial analysis. The results showed that the regions with the highest coffee farm profits are Purwodadi but less efficient in production expenses than Prigen. Tutur had lowest rated coffee production areas it is necessary to reconsider the physical suitability parameters topography, climate and soil.

References

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and Statistics Canada, 2000. Understanding Measurements of Farm Income. Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada.

Asdak, Chay, 2014. Hydrology and Watershed Management Area. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Departement of Forestry, 2003. Preparation of Spatial Data Wasteland. Center of Forest Agency. Jakarta.

Fcaog, 2008. Washington County, Utah Critical Lands Resource Guide. Washington County, Utah.

Hardjowigeno, S., and Widiatmaka, 2007. Land Suitability Evaluation and Planning Land Classification Land. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Intarawichian and Songkot, 2010. Analytical hierarchy process for landslide susceptibility mapping in LOWER MAE CHAEM watershed. J. Sci. Technol., 17 (3): 277-292.

Jafari, S. and Z. Narges, 2010. Land suitability analysis using multi attribute decision making approach. International Jour-

nal of Environmental Science and Development, 1 (5).

Nainggolan, H. Leonardo and J. Aritonang, 2012. Commoditybased agricultural development in the context of sustainable development. Ccase study Humbang Hasundutan District. Agribussiness Departemen, University of Nommesen, Medan.

Malczewski, J., 2010. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of literature. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 20 (7): 703-726.

Ministry of Environment and Forestry, 2014. Ministry of Environment and Forestry Statistics 2014.

www.menlhk.go.id/downlot.pp?fi le=STATISTIK_2014.pdf

Montazar and Snyder, 2012. A multi-attribute preference model for optimal irrigated crop planning under water scarcity conditions, Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 10 (3): 826-837.

Rossiter, D.G., 1994. Land Evaluation Lecture Notes, part 4, Economic Land Evaluation. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Dept. of Soil, Crop & Atmospheric Sci., SCAS Teaching Series T94-1.

Rossiter, D.G., 2011. Economic land evaluation: why and how. Soil Use & Management, 11: 132-140.

Rossiter, D.G. and A.R. van Wambeke, 1997. Automated Land Evaluation System ALES Version 4.65d User vs Manual. Cornell Univ., Dept of Soil Crop & Atmospheric Sci., SCAS, Ithaca NY, USA.

Shamsi, F. S. R., 2010. Integrating Linear Programming and Analytical Hierarchical Processing in Raster-GIS to optimize land use pattern at watershed level. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage, 14 (2): 81-85.

Sinukaban, N., 2007. Effect of Soil Conservation and Providing Processing Straw Mulch on Food Crop Production and Erosion Hara; Soil and Water Conservation Key to Sustainable Development. Directorate General RLPS, Departement of Foresrty Press, pp. 1-14.

Soemarno, 2013. Land resources management: dry land and critical land. Lecture notes, Program doctor, Brawijaya University, Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2017

How to Cite

MAROETO, ATMOJO SUNTORO, W., DJOKO, S., & ROSSYDA, P. (2017). NET FARM INCOME AS REFLECTION OF CRITICAL LAND EVALUATION IN WELANG WATERSHED, INDONESIA. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 23(5), 826-833. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/5596