PERIPHERAL BLOOD LEUCOCYTES DISTRIBUTION AND ADRENAL FUNCTION IN GROWING PIGS, FED PROBIOTIC SUPPLEMENTED DIET*

Authors

  • D. GUDEV Institute of Animal Science, BG – 2232 Kostinbrod, Bulgaria Author
  • S. POPOVA-RALCHEVA Agricultural Academy, Institute for Information Serving of the System, BG – 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • P. MONEVA Institute of Animal Science, BG – 2232 Kostinbrod, Bulgaria Author
  • M. IGNATOVA Institute of Animal Science, BG – 2232 Kostinbrod, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

cortisol, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, aspartate aminotransferase activity, neonatal piglets

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate adrenal status, peripheral blood leucocytes distribution and activity of the enzymes (AST) and (ALT) in piglets during the neonatal period.
Pregnant Danube white sows (n=24) were allotted to 4 groups as follow: the sows and their piglets did not receive supplemental probiotic („Lactina”); both the sows and piglets diets were supplemented with probiotic; the supplemental probiotics was only given to the sows (their piglets were deprived of „Lactina”); the supplemental probiotic was only given to the piglets. The diet for sows was supplemented with „Lactina” (500 g/ton) from the 85 day of pregnancy until weaning of their piglets (35 days of age). Piglets were given 800 g same probiotic per ton diet during the pre-starter period and 500 g/ton during the starter period.
Probiotic „Lactina” had no significant effect on plasma cortisol level, neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio and aspartate aminotransferase activity at both 5 and 35 d age. Alanine aminotransferase activity was higher in II group at 5 (P>0.05) and 35 d of age (P<0.01). It is concluded that the increased ALT activity in the second group of piglets was due to psychological stress induced by the screaming of the previously handled pigs during the sampling.

 

References

Bergmeyer, H. and E. Bernt, 1963. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis.

Bourliox, P., B. Koletzko, F. Guanrner and V. Braesco, 2002. The intestins and its microflora are partners for the protection of the host: report on the danone Symposium “The inteligent intestine”. Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78: 675-683.

Dhabhar, F. S., A. H. Miller, B. S. McEwen and R. L. Spencer, 1995. Effects of stress on immune cell distribution. Dynamics and hormonal mechanisms. The Journal of Immunology, 154: 5511-5527.

De Jong, I. C., S. van Voorst, D. A. Ehlhard and H. J. Brokhuis, 2002. Effect of restricted feeding on physiological stress in growing broilers breeeders. Br. Poult. Sci., 43: 156-168.

Grigorova, S., S. Surdjiska, D. Stoyanov and M. Dimitrova, 2004. Influence of probiotic “Lactina” on the productivity of layers. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 10: 634-642.

Gross, W. B. and H. S. Siegel, 1983. Evaluation of the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a measure of stress in chickens. Avian Dis., 27: 972-979.

Kanchev, L. N., H. Dobson, W. K. Ward and R. J. Fitzpatric, 1976. Concentration of steroids in bovine peripheral plasma during oestrus cycle and effect of betamethasone treatment. J. Repr. Fert., 48: 341-345.

Majamaa, H., E. Isolauri, M. Saxelin and T. Vesikari, 1995. Lactate acid bacteria in treatment of acute rotavirus gastroenteritis. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr., 20: 333-339.

Post, J., J. M. Rebel and A. Alder Huurne, 2003. Automated blood cells count: a sensitive stress in broilers. Poult. Sci., 82: 591-595.

Smirnov, O. K., 1974. Early determination of animal productivity. Moskva. Kolos (Ru).

Stoyanov, D., 2005. Study on the possibilities for replacement of nutritive antibiotics in concentrate mixture with the probiotic “Lactina”. Disertation, Sofia (Bg).

Wollowski, I., G. Rechkemmer and B. L. Pool-Zobel, 2001. Protective role of probiotics and prebiotics in colon cancer. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73: 4519-455.

Downloads

Published

28.02.2012

How to Cite

GUDEV, D., POPOVA-RALCHEVA, S., MONEVA , P., & IGNATOVA, M. (2012). PERIPHERAL BLOOD LEUCOCYTES DISTRIBUTION AND ADRENAL FUNCTION IN GROWING PIGS, FED PROBIOTIC SUPPLEMENTED DIET*. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 18(1), 112-116. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/5473