CHANGES IN FRUIT YIELD, QUALITY AND NUTRIENT CONCENTRATIONS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL HUMIC ACID APPLICATIONS IN PROCESSING TOMATO

Authors

  • F. O. ASRI Bati Akdeniz Agricultural Research Institute, 07100 Antalya, Turkey Author
  • E. I. DEMIRTAS Bati Akdeniz Agricultural Research Institute, 07100 Antalya, Turkey Author
  • N. ARI Bati Akdeniz Agricultural Research Institute, 07100 Antalya, Turkey Author

Keywords:

fruit quality, humic acid, nutrient concentration, tomato, yield

Abstract

Humic acids (HA) provide formation of the organomineral in soil, thus they improve nutrient concentration of tomato leaves and agricultural production. The objective of this study was to find effects of soil HA applications on yield, fruit quality and nutrient concentration of processing tomato. Humic acid was sprayed on soil at the rate of 0, 40, 80, 120, 160 and 200 L ha-1 soil along with uniform dose of nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium (NPK) (180-60-210 kg ha-1) was applied through drip irrigation. The experiment was conducted according to randomized complete block design with 4 replicates in 2011-2012 years. The humic acid applications caused a significant increase of yield. Titretable acidity, fruit weight and fruit diameter showed increase by ascending humic acid levels. Results showed that N, P, K, Ca, Zn and Mn concentration of leaves was increased by humic acid, especially 80 L ha-1 humic acid level provided the most important progress in the frst year. In the second year, N, P, K, Fe and Mn concentration of leaves was positive changed by humic acid and high levels of humic acid caused decline. Therefore, mid-levels (80 and 120 L ha-1) were found more effective.

References

Achilea, O., 1998. Citrus and Tomato Quality is Improved by Optimized K Nutrition. In: Improved Crop Quality by Nutrient Management. Anac, D. and P.Martin-prevel(eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 19-22.

Adani, F., P. Genevini, P. Zaccheo and G. Zocchi, 1998. The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth and mineral nutrition. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 21 (3): 561-575.

Akinci, S., T. Buyukkeskin, A. Eroglu and B. E. Erdogan, 2009. The Effect of Humic Acid on Nutrient Composition in Broad Bean (Vicia faba L.) Roots. Not Sci Biol., (1): 81-87.

Atiyeh, R. M., N. Arancon, C. A. Edwards and J. D. Metzger, 2000. Influence of earthworm-processed pig manure on the growth and yield of greenhouse tomatoes. Biosource Technology, 75: 175-180.

Bohme, M. and H. Lua, 1997. Influence of Mineral and Organic Treatments in the Rhizosphere on the Growth of Tomato Plants. Acta Horticulturae, 450: 161-168.

Brannon, C. A. and L. E. Sommers, 1985. Preparation and Characterization of Model Humic Polymers Containing Organic P. Soil Biol.Biochem., 17 (2): 213-219.

Bremner, J. M., 1996. Total Nitrogen. In Sparks, D.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis Chemical Methods, Part 3. Soil Science Society of America Inc., American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 1085-1022.

Carvajal, M., F. Martinezsanchez and C. F. Alcaraz, 1995. Improvement of Fruit Colour Quality of Paprika Combined Treatments of Humic Acids. Acta Alimentaria, 24 (4): 321-329.

Cemeroglu, B., 1992. Basic Analysis Methods in fruit and Vegetables Processing Industry. Biltav Publication: Ankara, 381 pp.

Chapagain, P. B. and Z. Wiesman, 2004. Effect of potassium magnesium chloride in the fertigation solution as partial source of potassium on growth, yield and quality of greenhouse tomato. Scientia Horticulturae, 99: 279-288.

Chen, Y. and T. Aviad, 1990. Effect of Humic Substances on Plant Growth. In: Humic Substances in Soil and Crop Sciences: Selected Reading, MacCarthy, P., C.E.Clapp, R.L.Malcolm and P.R. Bloom (Eds). Soil Science Society American., Madison, WI., pp. 161-187.

Chen, Y., H. Magen and C. E. Clapp, 2001. Plant growth stimulation by humic substances and their complexes with iron. pp.1-14In: Proceedings of the Dalia Greidinger Symposium, Lisbon, Portugal. The International Fertilizer Society.

Dorais, M., A. Papadopoulos and A. Gosselin, 2001. Greenhouse Tomato Fruit Quality. Horticultural Review, 26: 239-350.

Eyheraguibel, B., J. Sivestre and P. Morard, 2008. Effects of humic substances derived from organic waste enhancement on the growth and mineral nutrition of maize. Bioresource Technology, 99 (10): 4206-4212.

Fagbenro, J. A. and A. A. Agboola, 1993. Effect of Different Levels of Humic Acids on the Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Teak Seedlings. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 16 (8): 1465-1483.

Ferrara, G., A. Pacifico, P. Simeone and E. Ferrara, 2007. Preliminary Study on The Effects of Foliar Applications of Humic Acids on ‘Italia’ Table Grape. XXXth World Congress of Vine and Wine. www.oiv2007.hu/documents

Gezgin, S., N. Dursun and F. Gökmen, 2010. Effect of Applications Different Amounts of K-Humat Treatments on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet. 1. Congress of National Soil and Water. Pp. 250-258.

Guppy, C. N., N. W. Menzies, P. W. Moody and F. P. C. Blamey, 2005. Competitive Sorption Reactions between Phosphorus and Organic Matter in Soil: A Review. Australian Journal of Soil Science, 43: 189-202.

Grossl, P. R. and W. P. Inskeep, 1991. Precipitation of Dicalcium Phosphate Dehydrate in The Presence of Organic Acids. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55: 670-675.

Hewitt, J. D., M. Dinar and M. A. Stevens, 1982. Sink Strenght of Fruits of Two Tomato Genotypes Differing in Total Fruit Solids Content. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 107: 896-900.

Kacar, B. and A. Inal, 2008. Plant Analyses. Nobel Pres No: 1241 (Tr).

Liu, C. H., R. J. Cooper and D. C. Bowman, 1998. Humic Acid Application Affects Photosynthesis, Root Development and Nutrient Content of Creeping Bent Grass. HortScience, 33 (6): 1023-1025.

Lopez Camelo, A. F. and P. A. Gomez, 2004. Comparison of color indexes for tomato ripening. Horticultura Brasileira, 22: 534-537.

Marschner, H., 2002. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Institute of Plant Nutrition University of Hohenheim Federal Republic of Germany. Academic Press.

Nikbakht, A., M. Kafi, M. Babalar, Y. P. Xia, A. Luo and N. Etemadi, 2008. Effect of Humic Acid on Plant Growth, Nutrient Uptake, and Postharvest Life of Gerbera. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 31: 2155-2167.

Padem, H. and A. Ocal, 1998. Effects of Humic Acid Applications on Yield and Some Characteristics of Processing Tomato. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 487: VI International Symposium on Processing Tomato & Workshop on Irrigation & Fertigation of Processing Tomato Petro-Turza, M., 1987. Flavor of Tomato and Tomato Products. Food Reviews International, 2: 309-351.

Piccolo, A., S. Nardi and G. Concheri, 1992. Structural Characteristics of Humic Substances as Related to Nitrate Uptake and Growth Regulation in Plant Systems. Soil Biol. Biochem., 24 (4): 373-380.

Samson, G. and S. A. Visser, 1989. Surface Active Effects of Humic Acids on Potato Cell Membrane Properties. Soil Biology Biochemistry, 21: 343-347.

Saruhan, V., A. Kuşvuran and S. Babat, 2011. The Effect of Different Humic Acid Fertilization on Yield and Yield Components Performances of Common Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Scientific Research and Essays, 6 (3): 663-669.

Sarhan, T. Z., G. H. Mohammad and J. A. Teli, 2011. Effects of Humic Acid and Bread Yeast on Growth and Yield of Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 1: 1091-1096.

Scott, D. T., D. M. McKnight, E. L. Blunt-Harris, S. E. Kolesar and D. R. Lovley, 1998. Quinone Moieties Act As Electron Acceptors in the Reduction of Humic Substances by Humics-Reducing Microorganisms. Environmental Science and Tecnology, 32: 2984-2989.

Selim, E. M., S. I. Shedeed, F. F. Asaad and A. S. El-Neklawy, 2012. Interactive Effects of Humic Acid and Water Stress on Chlorophyll and Mineral Nutrient Contents of Potato Plants. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8 (1): 531-537.

Sharif, M., R. A. Khattak and M. S. Sarir, 2002. Effect of Different Levels of Lignitic Coal Derived Humic Acid on Growth of Maize Plants. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 33: 3567-3580.

Vasilenko, V., 2002. Hydroponics and Humates: Ancient Acids for Modern Agriculture. The Best of the Growing Edge International, 2000-2005: Select Cream-of-The-Crop Articles for Soilless Growers. New Moon Publishing, pp. 373-375.

Wang, X. J., Z. Q. Wang and S. G. Li, 1995. The Effect of Humic Acids on the Availability of Phosphorus Fertilizers in Alkaline Soils. Soil Use and Management, 11 (2): 99-102.

Wang, Y., R. Liu, S. Huang and J. Jin, 2009. Effects of Potassium Application on Flavor Compounds of Cherry Tomato Fruits. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 32: 1451-1468.

Yagmur, B., B. Okur and A. R. Ongun, 2004. Effects on Enchanged Potassium Doses on Yield, Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Tomato. IPI regional workshop on Potassium and Fertigation development in West Asia and North Africa; Rabat, Morocco, 24-28 November. http://www.ipipotash.org

Yildirim, E., 2007. Foliar and soil fertilization of humic acid affect productivity and quality of tomato. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil Plant Science, 57: 182-186.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2015

Issue

Section

Agrochemisty and Soil Science

How to Cite

O. ASRI, F., I. DEMIRTAS, E., & ARI, N. (2015). CHANGES IN FRUIT YIELD, QUALITY AND NUTRIENT CONCENTRATIONS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL HUMIC ACID APPLICATIONS IN PROCESSING TOMATO. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 21(3), 585-591. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/5382