Changes in Productivity and Quality of Forage from Pea and Vetch under Impact of Products with Different Biological Effect
Keywords:
green mass, nitrogen content, pea, vetchAbstract
Production of good quality fodder is of great importance for economical animal production. Both quality and quantity of fodders are influenced by the used plant species, their stage of growth and the applied agronomic practices. The object of this study is to make an assessment of the feeds from main annual legume species – pea and vetch – in quantitative and qualitative terms. Experimental work was conducted in Institute of Forage Crops, Pleven, during the period 2007-2009. The changes in green mass productivity and nitrogen content of fodder under impact of separate and combined use of different products (Atonic, growth regulator; Masterblend, leaf fertilizer; Confidor, insecticide) and phenological stages of application (budding, flowering, budding and flowering) were observed.
References
Bose, M. S. C. and V. Balakarishnan, 2001. Forage production technologies. South Asian Publishers, New Delhi, 206 pp. (Ind)
Caballero, R., C. Barro, A. Rebolé, M. Arauzo and P. J. Hernaiz, 1996. Yield components and forage quality of common vetch during pod filling. Agronomy Journal, 88: 797-800.
Ilieva, A. and V. Kosev, 2013. Evaluation of spring forage pea varieties by quality-related characteristics. Banat’s Journal of Biotechnology, IV: 54-58.
Ivanov, K. and A. Kirilov, 2010. Study of changes in yield structute and chemical composition in spring pea and vetch. Proceedings of Scientific Conference USB-Veliko Tarnovo, 22-23 May, 249-253.
Kaiser, A. G. and J. W. Piltz, 2002. Silage production from tropical forages in Australia. In: L. M. Gechie and C. Thomas (Editors), Proceedings of the 13th International Silage Conference in Australia; 11-13 September 2002. pp. 8-9 (UK).
Kim, J. D., C. H. Kwonand and D. A. Kim, 2001. Yield and quality of silage corn as affected by hybrid maturity, planting date and harvest stage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 1: 1705-1711.
Kirilov, A., 1990a. Study on peas as forage for ruminants. I. Yield and composition. Animal sciences, 6: 26-31.
Kirilov, A., 1990b. Study on peas as forage for ruminants. II. Digestibility and consumption of green mass of peas. Animal sciences, 6: 32-37.
Kirilov, A., 2009. Variation in some qualitative characteristics of fresh and preserved forages. Dr. Sci. thesis, Pleven.
Kosev, V. and A. Ilieva, 2015. Evaluation of quality-related characteristics and yield in winter forage pea varieties. Banat’s Journal of Biotechnology, VI, 1: 54-60.
Naidenova, I. and V. Kosev, 2015. Composition, digestibility and feeding value estimation of forage pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties and hybrids. Agricultural Science and Technology /in print/.
Official Methods of Analysis. 1990. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th Edition.
Pachev, I., N. Georgieva and L. Fachikov, 2011. Study of the influence of universal slurry «Maxgrow» in spring vetch (Vicia sativa L). Journal of Mountain Agriculture on the Balkans, 14, 1: 119-127.
Pachev, I., 2012. Study of the influence of universal slurry «Maxgrow» on seed yield of spring forage pea (Pisum satvum L.). Soil science, Agrochemistry and Ecology, 2: 63-67.
Pachev, I., I. Dimitrov, S. Raykov and N. Miroshnichenko, 2012. Study the influence of the preparation for foliar feeding “Foliarel-proti Bor” in spring forage pea (Pisum satvum L.). Agricultiral Science, 45, 2: 34-38.
Parveen, S., I. A. Qamar, A. Ali and M. Arshad, 2001. Effect of legume – grass mixture on forage yield and quality in Pothwar Plateau of Pakistan. Journal of Biological Sciences, 1: 809-811.
Rehman, A. U. and A. Khan, 2003. Effect of feeding whole maize crop versus Mott grass silage on milk yield and its composition in Sahiwal cows. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 19: 313-316.
Sarwar, M., M. A. Khan and Z. Iqbal, 2002. Status paper of feed resources for livestock in Pakistan. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 4: 186-192
Stancheva, Y., 2000. Ecological bases of agriculture. Pensoft, Sofia.
Thielert, W., 2006. A unique product: The story of the imidacloprid stress shield. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer, 59 (1): 73-86.
Tsibulko, V. S., Y. Buryak, S. I. Popov and O. V. Chornobab, 2000. Pea, winter vetch, lucerne. Novelties in the technology of cultivation for seed, Kharkov, Ukraine.
Vladimirovich, D. A., 2008. Agri-environmental aspects of the protection of pea from the complex of harmful objects in the zone of an unreliable moistening of Stavropol Territory. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskaniye uchenoy stepeni kandidata sel’skokhozyaystvennykh nauk. Stavropol, 2008.
Zhelyazkova, T. and D. Pavlov, 2004. Effect of some growth regulators on the productivity of spring pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Science, 41: 560-563.
Zhelyazkova, T., D. Pavlov, D. Nenkova and I. Ivanova, 2004. Effect of some growth regulators on the productivity of spring vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Bulg J Plant Sci, 41: 556-559.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
