EFFECT OF BAYKAL EM-1 ON GROWTH DEVELOPMENT AND MICROBIOLOGICAL STATUS OF SUCKLING PIGS

Authors

  • SONYA IVANOVA Agrarian Academy, Agricultural institutte – Shumen, BG - 9700, Shumen, Bulgaria Author
  • ALBENA DIMITROVA National Diagnostic Research Veterinary Medical Institute, bul. Pencho Slaveikov 15a, Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • TANYA NIKOLOVA Agrarian Academy, Agricultural institutte – Shumen, BG - 9700, Shumen, Bulgaria Author
  • SIMEON YORDANOV National Diagnostic Research Veterinary Medical Institute, bul. Pencho Slaveikov 15a, Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • RADKA NEDEVA Agrarian Academy, Agricultural institutte – Shumen, BG - 9700, Shumen, Bulgaria Author
  • KATERINA MATEEVA Agrarian Academy, Agricultural institutte – Shumen, BG - 9700, Shumen, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

pigs, feed additives, probiotics, “Baykal EM-1”, average daily gain, effectiveness, E. coli

Abstract

In an experiment with 15 equalized by piglet age, origin and size litters, of which 8 litters in the trial and 7 litterts in the control group, the effect of Baikal EM-1 feed additive, a multi-purpose microbiological product containing a complex of living, useful microorganisms, on the weight development and the microbiological status of the gastrointestinal tract of the pigs, was studied. The additive was included in the feed of the sows and pigs at a dosage of 10 ml / kg of feed, from the day 8th after birth to the day 35th at weaning of the pigs. On the day 21st and day 35th the body weights of the pigs were recorded, and on the day 35th, 10 rectal tampon samples (RTS) from the two groups were taken and microbiologically examined.

It was found that the data on weight development, total growth and average daily gain did not show any significant differences in the benefit of the trial group, which contradicts the hitherto established for many other feed additives. Microbiological tests showed that 40% of the RTS of both groups were positive for E. coli, of which in the trial group 75% were nonpathogenic and 25% pathogenic (O139:F4) in and in the control group 75% pathogenic (O139:F4) and 25% non-pathogenic, which represents the product as a good prophylactic remedy.

References

***SCIENTIFIC AND METHODOLOGICAL RECOMMENDATIONS on the use of the microbiological preparation “Baykal” EM-1-Y for the fermentation of fodder in pigs, KHARKOV 2005, The recommendations were prepared by the Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine. Kvasnitsky LLC “EM-center Ukraine”, http:// shablin.ru/em-biblioteka/em-biblioteka/594-svinovodstvo.html, last accessed on 24.10.2017.

Angelova, L., 2000. Other biologically active substances and prophylactic additives. In: Guidebook Pig farm directory, under editing A. Andreev, Publishing house - TU St. Zagora, 173-186.

Angelova, L., M. Tenchev, 2008. Fodder Additives. A Guidebook on Pig Breeding, edited by A. Andreev, Publishing house - Dyonisis, Sofia, 158-173.

Close, W.H., 2000. Addressing the Challenges of Modern Pig Breeding. Alltech, European lecture tour, ІV-th SC, Sofia, 2238.

Dimitrova, A., 2009. Bacterial infections in farms affected by PRRS. NDRVMI, Sofia, Dissertation.

Dimitrova, A., 2010. Program for Control of Bacterial Diseases in association with PRRS. Vet. Collection, 9-10, 16-20.

Dimitrova, A., R. Bankova, S. Yordanov, S. Mavrikova, D. Petlov, 2003. Comparative study of „Bioxan-emulsum” in suckling pigs for prophylaxis of bacterial enteritis. Annuaire de ĽUniversite de Sofia „St. Kliment Ohridski”, Faculte de Biologie, Livre 4, 10 eme Session scientifique, Tome 96, 2005, 411-417.

Dimitrova, A., S. Yordanov, Kr. Petkova, T. Savova, R. Bankova, S. Ivanova, 2015. An example of an antibacterial therapy and methaphylaxis of colibacteriosis in intensive pig breeding. JS conf. with intern. part., Kostinbrod, Sofia, 4-6.

Dragoycheva, M., A. Dimitrova, S. Yordanov, 2011. Prevalence and Dynamics of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in pigs in Bulgaria for the period 2006-2010. LTU, FVM, Sofia, XX NC with IP, Yundola, 149-152.

Dimitrova, A., S. Yordanov, M. Dragoycheva, T. Savova, R. Bankova, 2014. Spectrum, dynamics and sensitivity to antimicrobial agents of E. coli strains isolated from pigs. Vet. Collection, 4-5, 44-49.

Drumev, Dr., 2001. Some Possibilities for Limiting and Eliminating Antimicrobial Resistance of pathogenic for animal bacteria. Vet. Collection, 9-10, 15-20.

Federation of Veterinarians of Europe (FVE), 2003. Antibiotic resistance in рrudent use of Antibiotics in Veterinary Medecine. Brussels, 1-10.

Fraile, L., 2013, Antimicrobial therapy in swine. A practical approach. Zoetis. Grupo Asis Biomedia, S.L., Zaragoza, Spain. Lyutskanov, M., 2013. Structure, Epidemiological Events and Possibilities for Control of Certain Current Bacterial Infections of a Conditioned Type in Newborn and Adult Animals in Intensive Livestock Farms. TU FVM, St. Zagora, Dissertation.

Mateva, V., 2010. Influence of the multybacterial immunomodulator “Nadstim” on the growth, health status and humoral immune response of suckling and growing pigs. LTU, FVM, Sofia, Dissertation.

Murgov, I., Z. Denkov, 2007, The place of probiotics and probiotic foods in the protection of public health. SC with IP “Immunity support for health from nature and science in Bulgaria”, Sofia, 15.

Parvulov, B., S. Markov, 1996. Probiotics and their place in live stock breeding. SAA, RVS-Vratsa, SC “60 years RVS-Vratsa”, NT, 143-146.

Petkova, Kr., 2017. Distribution, Diagnosis and Control of Problematic Bacterial Enteritis in weaning Pigs in Industrial Pig Industry of Bulgaria. NDRVMI, Sofia, Dissertation.

Petkova, Kr., A. Dimitrova, S. Yordanov, T. Savova, 2014. Colinfection in swine pigs in industrial pigs. LTU, FVM, NC with IP, Yundola, November, Coll. Reports, Sofia, 181-188.

Plamb, K.D., 2002. Florfenicol. Pharmacological preparations in veterinary medicine. 3 edition, Publ. „Aquarium“, Moscow, 336-337.

Popova, T., 2009. Antimicrobial chemotherapy. Microbiology. LТU, Sofia, 122-138.

Popova, T., 2013, Antimicrobial in vitro activity of modern chemical, chemotherapeutic and herbal preparations and methods for decontamination of organic livestock waste. LТU, Sofia, Dissertation.

Reid, G., R. Friendship. 2002. Alternatives to antibiotic use: microbiological perspective. Am. Biotech. 13: 97-112.

Slavchev. G., 2004. Nutritional Value and Health Effect of Lactic Acid Products and Lactic Acid Bacteria. Vet. Collection, 9-10, 8-10.

Vestič, Luka Č., 2012. 10 Years of Floron in pig health protection. KRKA in Pig Health Management, 3-th International Symposium, Brugest, 24 April.

Virtanen, E., 2004. The new generation of feed acidifiers. Euro Tier Innovations. Pig Topics, 20 (1): 20-21.

Yordanov, S. 2008. Colibacteriosis. In: Guidebook Pig farm. Publishing house - Dyonisis, Sofia, 374-375.

Yordanov, S., 2014, Porcine coliinfection. Guidebook of the Veterinarian, LTU, Sofia, 319-326.

Yordanov, S., A. Dimitrova, 2014, Colibacteriosis / colienteritis in suckling and weaned pigs. Infectious diseases in pigs. Publ. house -Intel-Entrance, Sofia, 102-106.

Yordanov, S., A. Dimitrova, Kr. Ganchev, St. Gancheva, R. Bankova, G. Dimitrov, 2009. Application and effectiveness of Tanacid and Carbovet feed additives for prophylaxis and stimulation of growth in growing pigs. Vet. Collection, 1-2, 31-38.

Yordanov, S., A. Dimitrova, T. Popova, Kr. Petkova, T. Savova, R. Bankova, 2016. Sensitivity of intestinal Escherichia coli strains isolated from pigs to Florfenicol. Animal Breeding Sciences, LIII, 3-6, 129-137.

Yordanov, S., V. Stanev, A. Dimitrova, M. Dimitrova, 2006. Comparative study of the clinical effectiveness of Vevo-Vital (benzoic acid) in growing pigs in the conditions of industrial pigs. Vet. Collection, 3-4, 25-30.

Downloads

Published

31.12.2018

How to Cite

IVANOVA, S., DIMITROVA, A., NIKOLOVA, T., YORDANOV, S., NEDEVA, R., & MATEEVA, K. (2018). EFFECT OF BAYKAL EM-1 ON GROWTH DEVELOPMENT AND MICROBIOLOGICAL STATUS OF SUCKLING PIGS. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 24(Supplement 2), 27-32. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/5045