The effect of different blades on the performance values of a pruning chopper used to improve soil properties

Authors

  • Murad Canakci Akdeniz University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Engineering, Campus, 07070 Konyaaltı, Antalya, Turkey Author
  • Mehmet Topakci Akdeniz University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Engineering, Campus, 07070 Konyaaltı, Antalya, Turkey Author
  • Davut Karayel Akdeniz University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Engineering, Campus, 07070 Konyaaltı, Antalya, Turkey Author
  • Bora Agsaran Bati Akdeniz Agricultural Research Institute, Demircikara Mahallesi Paşa Kavakları Cad., PK 35, Antalya, Turkey Author
  • Onder Kabas AkdenizUniversity, Technical Sciences Vocational School, Campus, 07070 Konyaaltı, Antalya, Turkey Author
  • Mete Yigit Akdeniz University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Engineering, Campus, 07070 Konyaaltı, Antalya, Turkey Author

Keywords:

Pruning residue, chopping, power, energy, blades, particle size

Abstract

Chopping is a critical process in recycling of the pruning residues at different forms. Choosing the right blades in machines used for this purpose will positively contribute to obtaining suitable particles and reducing the operation costs. The effects of the three different blade types on the performance values of a on the go machine, which is used in the orchards among intrarows to chop the pruning residues were investigated in this study. The hammer, universal and Y type blades were used in trials for chopping the pruning residues of the pomegranate and orange. In this study, power and energy requirements and average geometric diameters of the chopped residues were determined. Based on the research results, the effect of the blade types usedon power consumption of the machine and the particle size was found statistically significant. The maximum power consumption and the smallest particles were identified in the hammer blade for both pruning residues. These values were 22.28 kW – 11.63 mm for pomegranate and 19.29 kW 13.03 mm for orange, respectively. The lowest values, however, were determined in the Y type blade as these values were 13.44 kW – 14.15 mm for pomegranate and 10.44 kW – 17.11 mm for orange. The values obtained from all applications for energy requirement were calculated as 4.24 – 7.07 kWh t-1 for pomegranate and 4.64 – 8.57 kWh t-1 for orange.

References

Adamchuk, V., Bulgakov, V., Skorikov, N., Yezekyan, T. & Olt, J. (2016). Developing a new design of wood chopper for grape vine and fruit tree pruning and the results of field testing. Agronomy Research, 14 (5), 1519–1529.

Calatrava, J. & Franco, J. A. (2011). Using pruning residues as mulch: Analysis of its adoption and process of diffusion in Southern Spain olive orchards. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 620629.

Çanakcı, M. (2014). Chopping and mechanization of the pruning residues. Hasad (Harvest) Journal – Plant Production, 29 (344), 7078 (Tr).

Çanakcı, M., Topakci, M., Karayel, D. & Ağsaran, J. (2010). Determination of basic machinery management data for PTO driven pruning residue chopper. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 16, 46-54 (Tr).

Çıtak, S., Sönmez, S. & Öktüren, F. (2006). The Usage Possibility of Plant Origin Wastes in Agriculture. Derim, 23 (1), 40-53 (Tr).

Dereli, İ. (2009). The Effects of Different Blades on The Performance of Stalk Choppers Used in Vineyard. Master Thesis, Ege University, Institute of Science and Technology, İzmir, Turkey, 62 pp. (Tr).

Fedrizzi, M., Sperandio, G., Pagano, M., Pochi, D., Fanigliulo, R. & Recchi, P. (2012). A prototype machine for harvesting and chipping of pruning residues: first test on hazelnut plantation (Corylus avellana L.). International Conference of Agricultural Engineering, CIGR-Ageng, July 812, Valencia, Spain.

Fernandez-Sarria, A., Lopez-Cortes, I., Estornell, J., Velazquez-Marti, B. & Salazar, D. (2019). Estimating residual biomass of olive tree crops using terrestrial laser scanning. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation, 75,163170.

Goncalves, C., Evtyugina, M., Alves, C., Monteiro, C., Pio, C. & Tome, M. (2011). Organic particulate emissions from field burning of garden and agriculture residues. Atmospheric Research, 101, 666–680.

Holtz, B. A., Caesar-TonThat, T. & McKenry, M. V. (2005). Wood chipping almond bruch and its effect on soil and petiole nutrients, soil aggregation, water infiltration, and nematode and basidiomycete population. Options Méditerranéennes, Série A, Numéro 63, 247254.

Işık, A. (1988). A Research on the Determination of Management Values for Optimum Machinery and Power of Vehicles Used in Agricultural Production, and Creation of Suitable Choosing Models. PhD Thesis, Cukurova University, Institute of Science and Technology, Adana, Turkey (Tr).

Jiménez-Jiménez, F., Blanco-Roldán, G. L., Márquez-García, M., Castro-García, S. & Agüera-Vega, J. (2013). Estimation of soil coverage of chopped pruning residues in olive orchards by image analysis. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 11 (3), 626-634.

Rotz, C. A. & Muhtar, H. A. (1992). Rotary power requirements for harvesting and handling equipment. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 8 (6), 751-757.

Şefl ek, Y., Çarman, K. & Özbek, O. (2006). Investigation of the performance of machine using in chopping of pruning residues. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Science, 2 (3), 219224 (Tr).

Korucu, T. & Mengeloğlu, F. (2007). Potentials of agricultural residues as raw materials and their alternative usage possibilities in Turkey. 24th National Agricultural Mechanization Congress, Kahramanmaras, Turkey, pp. 297-307 (Tr).

Manzanares, P., Ruiz, E., Ballesteros, M., Negro, N. J., Gallego, F. J., López-Linares, J. C. & Castro, E. (2017). Residual biomass potential in olive tree cultivation and olive oil industry in Spain: valorization proposal in a biorefi nery context. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 15 (3),e0206, 12 p.

Ntalos, G. A. & Grigoriou, A. H. (2002). Characterization and utilisation of vine prunings as a wood substitute for particleboard production. Industrial Crops and Products, 16, 59–68.

Recchia, L., Daou, M., Remediotti, M., Cini, E. & Vieri, M. (2009). New shredding machine for recycling pruning residuals. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 149–154.

Repullo, M. A., Carbonell, R., Hidalgo, J., Rodríguez-Lizana, A. & Ordóñez, R. (2012). Using olive pruning residues to cover soil and improve fertility. Soil & Tillage Research, 124, 3646.

Savoie, P. & Gagnon-Bouchard, M. (2012). High-speed processing of woody stems with a fl ail hammer shredder. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 27 (1), 5-12.

Spinelli, R., Magagnotti, N. & Nati, C. (2010). Harvesting vineyard pruning residues for energy use. Biosystems Engineering, 105, 316–322.

Spinelli, R., Lombardini, C., Pari, L. & Sadauskiene, L. (2014). An alternative to fi eld burning of pruning residues in mountain vineyards. Ecological Engineering, 70, 212–216

Velázquez-Martí, B., Fernández-González, E., Callejón-Ferre, A. J. & Cremades, J. E. (2012). Mechanized methods for harvesting residual biomass from Mediterranean fruit tree cultivations. Sci. Agric., 69 (3), 180-188.

Velázquez-Martí, B., Fernández-González, E., López-Cortés, I. & Salazar-Hernández, D. M. (2011). Quantifi cation of the residual biomass obtained from pruning of trees in Mediterranean olive groves. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 3208-3217.

Witney, B. (1996). Choosing and Using Farm Machines. Land Technology Ltd. Edinburgh, Scotland, 412 pp.

Yeniocak, M. (2008). Investigation of the Utilization of Vine Pruning Stalks (Vitis Vinifera L. cv. Sultani) As a Raw Material for Particleboard Manufacturing. M. Sc. Thesis, Mugla University, Institute of Science and Technology, Muğla, Turkey, 76 pp. (Tr).

Downloads

Published

31.10.2019

How to Cite

Canakci, M., Topakci, M., Karayel, D., Agsaran, B., Kabas, O., & Yigit, M. (2019). The effect of different blades on the performance values of a pruning chopper used to improve soil properties. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 25(5), 1052-1059. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/3895