Economic assessment of different irrigation regimes in sudan grass as a second crop

Authors

  • Rumen Bazitov Agricultural Institute, Stara Zagora 6000, Bulgaria Author
  • Stanimir Enchev Agricultural Institute, Shumen 9700, Bulgaria Author
  • Antonia Stoyanova Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Trakia University, Stara Zagora 6000, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

sudan grass, irrigation regime, economic assessment

Abstract

The experiment was conducted during the period 2014-2016 with sudan grass as second culture in the experimental field of the Agricultural Institute, Stara Zagora. In the field experience, the following options were studied: Variant 1 – no irrigation (control); Variant 2 – optimal irrigation, 70-75% of FC (100% irrigation rate); Variant 3 – irrigation as Variant 2 but with removal of first watering; Variant 4 – irrigation as Variant 2 but with removal of second watering; Variant 5 – irrigation as Variant 2 but with removal of third watering in order to establish the most effective irrigation regime for sudan grass. It has been found that the efficiency of irrigation water use in the different irrigation regimes is best expressed in optimal irrigation with three irrigations where each cubic meter of water provides 0.00402 t/ha of extra green biomass yield with near water efficiency for irrigation is the irrigation regime with a second watering system, where each cubic meter of water provides an additional extra of 0.00392 t/ha of green biomass.

References

Davidov, D. (2003). Efficiency of watering on furrows. In: Proceedings of national conference with international participation ‘Hydromelioration and mechanization – a factor for the sustainable development of agriculture’, IMM, Sofia, pp. 84-88 (Bg).

Davidov, D., & Stoyanova, A. (2010). Efficiency of irrigation of grain corn. Rastenievadni Nauki, 2, 144 -148 (Bg).

Eneva, S. (1996). Influence of the soil diversity on the yields and the effect of the irrigation on the agricultural crops. Pochvoznanie, Agrohimiya & Ekologiya, 21(3), 244-246 (Bg).

Kikindonov, Ts, & Slanev, K. (2011). Productivity of the new sudangrass variety Endje 1. Journal of Mountain Agriculture on the Balkans, 3(14), 564-575 (Bg).

Kotov, G. (1970). Ikonomika Selskogo Hozyaistva, No. 8 (Ru).

Matev, A. (2001). Influence of periodic water deficiency on the production of grain from corn plant. Rastenievadni Nauki, 5-6, 224-228 (Bg).

Мотеvа, М., & Stoyanova, А. (2010). Effect of irrigation water and economic results on maize for grain grown on a leavened reed. Rastenievadni Nauki, 6, 604-609 (Bg).

Slanev, K. (2013). Endzhe 1 – green leafy variety. Selskostopanska Nauka, 46(1), 62-65 (Bg).

Slanev, S., & Enchev, S. (2014). Influence of variety and crop productivity of sorghum x sudan grass hybrids in flowering stage. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 20(1), 182-185.

Varbanov, Ts. (1968). Ikonomika na Selskoto Stopanstvo, № 7 (Bg).

Vurlev, I., Kolev, N., Kirkova, J. & Eneva, S. (1994). Opportunities for significant water savings. In: Izvestiya na Instituta po Hidrotehnika i Melioracii, 14, pp. 14-23 (Bg).

Zhivkov, G. (1995a). Growing of corn for grain at optimum and shortage of water for irrigation. Rastenievadni Nauki, 9-10, 142-145 (Bg).

Zhivkov, J. (1995b). Irrigation regime for grain corn at water deficit. Rastenievadni Nauki, 9-10, 187-189 (Bg).

Downloads

Published

31.12.2020

How to Cite

Bazitov, R., Enchev, S., & Stoyanova, A. (2020). Economic assessment of different irrigation regimes in sudan grass as a second crop. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 26(6), 1179-1182. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/2464