Assessing polymorphism within common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) mutant lines originated from variety Mastilen 11b using Inter Simple Sequence Repeats markers

Authors

  • Sibel Aziz Agricultural Academy, Maritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute, Breeding Department, 4003 Plovdiv, Bulgaria; University of Plovdiv “Paisii Hilendarski”, Faculty of Biology, Department of Developmental Biology, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria Author
  • Velichka Spasova-Apostolova Agricultural Academy, Tobacco and Tobacco Products Institute, Department of Breeding and Seed Production, 4108 Markovo, Bulgaria; Agricultural University, Department of Microbiology and Environmental Biotechnology, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria Author
  • Veselina Masheva Agricultural Academy, Institute of Plant Genetic Resources “Konstantin Malkov”, Department of Plant Genetic Resources, 4122 Sadovo, Bulgaria Author
  • Nasya Tomlekova Agricultural Academy, Maritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute, Breeding Department, 4003 Plovdiv, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

Phaseolus vulgaris L., mutant lines, ISSR markers

Abstract

The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an economically important crop on a global scale, including in Bulgaria as well. It is an excellent source of vegetable protein and other nutrients. One of the methods of modern plant breeding aimed at creating genetic diversity in beans is induced mutagenesis. Molecular techniques are a suitable tool for characterizing induced mutations. The objective of this work is to evaluate the genetic diversity of a collection of EMS-induced mutant bean lines and to identify specific profiles, using ISSR molecular markers. The initial variety “Mastilen 11b” and 15 mutant lines from the collection of the Maritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute are analyzed with 14 ISSR reactions. A total of 187 fragments with lengths from 190 bp to 3100 bp are generated. Three of the reactions (ISSR 6, ISSR 8, ISSR 9) led to a generation of monomorphic profiles, and the remaining eleven reactions (ISSR 1, ISSR 2, ISSR 2T, ISSR 3, ISSR 4, ISSR 5, ISSR 7, ISSR 10, ISSR 12, UBC 807, UBC 809) amplified polymorphic profiles. The polymorphism ranged from 18.65 % to 87.50 % in the analyzed genotypes. The results showed that the applied ISSR markers are effective for assessing the existing genetic diversity of the studied bean mutant lines.

References

Aydin, M.F. & Baloch, F.Sh. (2019). Exploring the genetic diversity and population structure of Turkish common bean germplasm by the iPBS – retrotransposons markers. Legume Research, 42, 18– 24.

Blair, M.W., Díaz, L.M., Buendía, H.F. & Duque, M.C. (2009). Genetic diversity, seed size associations and population structure of a core collection of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theoretical Applied Genetics, 119, 955–972.

Chen, L., Mi, X., Comita, L.S., Zhang, L., Ren, H. & Ma, K. (2010). Community-level consequences of density dependence and habitat association in a subtropical broad-leaved forest. Ecologica Letter, 13, 695–704.

Denduangboripant, J., Setaphan, S., Suwanprasart, W. & Panha, S. (2010). Determination of local tobacco cultivars using ISSR molecular marker. Chiang Mai Journal Scientific, 37(2), 293–303.

Gepts, P., Osborn, T. C., Rashka, K. & Bliss, F. A. (1986). Phaseolin protein variability in wild forms and populations of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): Evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Economic Botany, 40, 451–468.

Gepts, P., Francisco, J.L., Barros, A.E., Blair, M.W., Brondani, R., Broughton, W., Galasso, I., Hernández, G., Kami, J., Lariguet, P., McClean, Ph., Melotto, M., Miklas, Ph., Pauls, P., Harand, A.P., Porch, T., Sánchez, F., Sparvoli, F. & Yu, K. (2008). Genomics of Phaseolus beans, a major source of dietary protein and micronutrients in the Tropics. Springer, Genomics of Tropical Crop Plants, Chapter 5, 113–143.

Giguère, G. (2006). Collecting and analyzing data in multidimensional scaling experiments: A guide for psychologists using SPSS. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 2(1), 26–37.

Lioi, L. & Piergiovanni, A.R. (2013). European common bean. Genetic and genomic resources of grain legume improvement, Elsevier, 11–34.

Marotti, I., Bonetti, A., Minelli, M., Catizone, P.& Dinelli, G. (2007). Characterization of some Italian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces by RAPD, semi-random and ISSR molecular markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 54, 175–188.

Mavromatis, A.G., Arvanitoyannis, I.S., Korkovelos, A.E., Giakountis, A., Chatzitheodorou, V.A. & Goulas, C.K. (2010). Genetic diversity among common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Greek landraces and commercial cultivars: Nutritional components, RAPD and morphological markers. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(4), 986–994.

Michelmore, R.W., Paran, I. & Kesseli, R.V. (1991). Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. National Academy of Science, USA, 88(21), 9828–9832.

Miklas, P.N., Kelly, J.D., Beebe, S.E. & Blair, M.W. (2006). Common bean breeding for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: From classical to MAS breeding. Euphytica, 147, 105–131.Mohan, M., Nair, S., Bhagwat, A., Krishna, T. G., Yano, M., Bhatia, C.R. & Sasaki, T. (1997). Genome mapping, molecular markers and marker-assisted selection in crop plants. Molecular Breeding, 3, 87–103.

Murray, M.G. & Thompson, W.F. (1980). Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Research, 8(19), 4321–4326.

Muthusamy, S., Kanagarajan, S. & Ponnusamy, Sh. (2008). Efficiency of RAPD and ISSR markers system in accessing genetic variation of rice bean (Vigna umbellata) landraces. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 11(3), 1–10.

Nemli, S., Kianosh, T. & Tanyolac, B. (2015). Genetic diversity and population structure of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) accessions through retrotransposon-based interprimer binding sites (iPBSs) markers. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 39, 940–948.

Ozturk, H.I., Dursun, A., Hosseinpour, A. & Haliloglu, K. (2020). Genetic diversity of pinto and fresh bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm collected from Erzincan province of Turkey by inter-primer binding site (iPBS) retrotransposon markers. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 44, 417– 427.

Powell, W., Morgante, M., Andre, Ch., Hanafey, M., Vogel, J., Tingey, S. & Rafalski, A. (1996). The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Molecular Breeding, 2, 225–238.

Rukmanski, G. (2005). Role of the mutations in the living nature, Gemplant, 128.

Saghai-Maroof, M.A., Soliman, K.M., Jorgenses, R.A. & Allard, R.W. (1984). Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics (ribosomal DNA spacer-length variation / restriction fragment-length polymorphisms / Rrnl / Rrn2). National Academy of Science, USA, 81, 8014–8018.

Santalla, M., De Ron, A.M. & De La Fuente, M. (2010). Integration of genome and phenotypic scanning gives evidence of genetic structure in Mesoamerican common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from the southwest of Europe. Theoretical Applied Genetics, 120, 1635–1651.

Shi, Ch., Navabi, A. & Yu, K. (2011). Association mapping of common bacterial blight resistance QTL in Ontario bean breeding populations. BMC Plant Biology, 11, 1–11.

Singh, M., Upadhyaya, H. & Bisht, I. (2013). Common bean. Genetic and genomic resources of grain legume improvement, Elsevier, 2–10.

Smykal, P., Coyne, C.J., Ambrose, M.J., Maxted, N., Schaefer, H., Blair, M.W., Berger, J., Greene, S.L., Nelson, M.N., Besharat, N., Vymyslický, T., Toker, C., Saxena, R.K., Roorkiwal, M., Pandey, M.K., Hu, J., Li,Y.H., Wang, L.X., Guo, Y., Qiu, L.J., Redden, R.J. & Varshney, R.K. (2015). Legume crops phylogeny and genetic diversity for science and breeding. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 34, 43–104.

Šustar-Vozlic, J., Maras, M., Kavornik, B. & Meglic, M. (2006). Genetic diversity and origin of Slovene common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm as revealed by AFLP markers and phaseolin analysis. Journal of American Horticultural Science, 131(2), 242–249.

Svetleva, D., Pereira, G., Carlier, J., Cabrita, L., Leitao, J. & Genchev, D. (2006). Molecular characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes included in Bulgarian collection by ISSR and AFLPTM analyses. Scientia Horticulturae, 109, 198–206.

Tomlekova, N. (2010). Induced mutagenesis for crop improvement in Bulgaria. Plant Mutation Reports, 2(2), 4–27.

Tomlekova, N. (2006). Introduction of protocols for the establishment of ISSR markers in the Capsicum annuum genome. Proceedings of First International Symposium “Ecological Approaches towards the Production of Safety Food”, 2006, 107–112.

Tomlekova, N., Yancheva, S., Balacheva, E. & Atanasova, B. (2012). Molecular identification of tomato mutant lines. Bioremediation, Biodiversity and Bioavailability, 6(1), 58–64.

Tomlekova, N., Sofkova-Bobcheva, S., Sarsu, F. & Baudoin, J.P. (2016). Genetic diversity of Bulgarian Phaseolus vulgaris L. based on phaseolin type and seed-coat colour. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 22(3), 447–451.

Tsonev, S., Todorova, V., Grozeva, S., Popova, T. & Todorovska, E. (2017). Evaluation of diversity in Bulgarian pepper cultivars by agronomical traits and ISSR markers. Genetika, 49(2), 647–662.

Young, F.W. & Harris, D.F. (2004). Multidimensional scaling.

In: Norusis, M.J. (Ed.), SPSS 13.0 Advanced Statistical Procedures Companion, 287‐354. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice‐Hall. Zargar, S.M., Farhat, S., Mahajan, R., Bhakhri, A. & Sharma, A. (2016). Unraveling the efficiency of RAPD and SSR markers in diversity analysis and population structure estimation in common bean. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 23(1), 139–149

Downloads

Published

26.08.2022

How to Cite

Aziz, S., Spasova-Apostolova, V., Masheva, V., & Tomlekova, N. (2022). Assessing polymorphism within common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) mutant lines originated from variety Mastilen 11b using Inter Simple Sequence Repeats markers. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 28(4), 709-716. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/1663