The Role of Small Farms in the Conditions of European Integration
Keywords:
CAP support, economic situation, economic size, production function, small farmsAbstract
The objective of the article is to highlight some definitions and the related criteria, defining small farms, to indicate structural changes in these farms in the last years, to estimate their economic situation and define their chances for future development in the conditions of CAP of EU. The following scientific methods have been used in the research: comparative analysis, method of statistical groupings, inquiry method, method of production function etc. The study shows that at the moment small farms manage to preserve their socio-economic role and importance for the development of agriculture and rural areas in Bulgaria and EU, although they have been reduced, and despite the serious problems they are facing: - They assist the sustainable and integrated development of rural areas; - They play essential social role supporting households’ incomes; - They play an important role in agricultural lands’ management, environmental protection, biodiversity and landscape. As a result of the analysis that was carried out, a conclusion can be made that the measures and mechanisms of CAP of EU do not support efficiently the development of small farms, do not respond to their needs and possibilities regarding pre-structuring, innovation, human potential development etc. In conclusion, the policy of EU and our national position towards small farms should be expressed clearly. They should not be perceived as an impediment to competitiveness increase of agriculture, but the accent should be on their role for supplying with public goods. Policy should be directed to serious support for small farms in the integrated development of rural areas.
References
Давидова, С. Полупазарните стопанства в Европа: Теоретични понятия и основни проблеми, доклад на семинар „Полупазарните стопанства в ЕС - състояние и перспективи”, Сибиу, Румъния, 13-15.10.2010 г.
Николов, Д. и колектив. 2009-2010. Социално-икономическа устойчивост на полупазарните стопанства, Научен проект, ИАИ, ССА.
Dinh Xuan Tung and S. Rasmussen. 2005. „Production function analysis for smallholder semi-subsistence and semi-commercial poultry production systems in three agroecological regions in Northern provinces of Vietnam”, National Institute of Animal Husbandry, Hanoi, Vietnam and The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Box 1870 Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Varian, R. H. 1993. Intermediate economics. A modern approach, W.W. Norton and Company, Inc. USA.
Vineta Vira and K. Narnicka. 2003. „Semi-subsistence farming in Latvia: Its Production function and what will be the impact of proposed EU suppord?” SSE Riga Working Papers, Stockholm School of Economics in Riga, Latvia.
Аграрни доклади, МЗХ, 2004-2010 г.
Преброяване на земеделските стопанства в Р България през 2010 г., предварителни данни, МЗХ, „Агростатистика”, 2011 г.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

