Methodological approach for measurement of sustainability in agriculture

Authors

  • BOJIDAR IVANOV Institute of Agricultural Economics – Sofia Author
  • TEODOR RADEV Agricultural University – Plovdiv Author
  • PETAR BORISOV Agricultural University – Plovdiv Author
  • DANIELA VACHEVSKA Institute of Viticulture and Enology – Pleven Author

Keywords:

methodological approach, sustainable agriculture, production, bio-physic limits, socio-economic limits, indicators

Abstract

The holistic view on sustainable agriculture is satisfying the current needs of human population of food. Currently all definitions of sustainable agriculture are basically focused on the three pillars of sustainable development - economic efficiency, ecological compatibility and social responsibility. These limits create predicament about development of methodological approach for measurement of sustainability. The aim of this paper is to develop wellfounded methodological approach for measurement of sustainability in agriculture. The production system is defined as complex of specific natural, human and technological resources. The bio-physical factors are coming from local conditions (geographical, physical, chemical and biological) in which farm are operating. These biophysical factors determine the climate, terrene, flora and fauna, type of soil, water sources and etc. The socio-economical conditions influence on activities of farm like possession of inputs and deliverance of output on market. Contrary influence of external conditions may lead to misbalance of agricultural system /farm/. Gathering needed information according to all pillars of sustainability it must be used various indicators. Some of them are specific and characterize typical object, others are integrative and provide detail information. Integrative indicators have advantage to cover group of objects which makes them suitable for decision making and following specific policies. In spite of obvious advantage of integrative indicators using them cause shortage of information about observed object. In this purpose the vital information must be synthesized in one indicator which later will be combined with others. All activities on definitions of indicators can be shown as a process which includes separate phases. Development of each phase can be executed using consultancy, feedbacks and giving new ideas improving the performance of the process.

References

Радомирска, И., Е. Кришков. 2006. Проблеми, породени от конвенционалното земеделие и концепцията за устойчиво земеделско производство. Обзор. Селскостопанска наука, vol. XXXIX, 2, с. 3-9.

Стойнев, К. 2004. Екологични и технологични аспекти на съвременното земеделие. Екоиновации ЕООД, С., с. 100.

Baginetas, K. N. 2008. The contested concept of sustainability in agriculture: an examination of the views of policymakers, scientist and farmers. In: Sustainable farmland management: Transdisciplinary approaches, R. Fish, S. Seymour, Ch. Watkins, M. Steven (eds.). CAB Intenational, pp. 30-41.

Douglas, G. K. 1984. Agricultural sustainability in a changing world order. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Holmberg, J., S. Bass, L. Timberlake. 1991. Defending the future. London: Earthscan and International Institute for environment and development.

Ketola, T. 1997. Ecological Eldorado: Eliminating excess over ecology. In: Hijacking environmentalism: Corporate response to sustainable development, R. Wefford (ed.). London: Earthscan, pp. 99-136.

Meadows, D. H., D. C. Meadows, J. Randers, W. W. Behrens. 1972. The limits to growght. New York: Universe.

Pretty, J. N. 1999. Value of natural and social capital for sustainable agriculture. In Emerging trends in sustainable agriculture, G. S. Dhaliwal, R. Arora, A. K. Dhavan (eds.). New Delhi: Commonwealth Publishers.

Vanloon, G. S., Patil L, Hugar. 2005. Agricultural Sustainability: Strategies for Assessment. Sage Publications.

Published

30.08.2012

How to Cite

IVANOV, B., RADEV, T., BORISOV, P., & VACHEVSKA, D. (2012). Methodological approach for measurement of sustainability in agriculture. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Management, 57(4), 48-59. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjaem/article/view/3654