Assessment of the competitiveness of agricultural holdings with organic production (according to data from a survey)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61308/AYNE4256Keywords:
organic farming, competitiveness, organic farms, prospectAbstract
The issue of determining and increasing the level of competitiveness of organic agricultural holdings is one of the current academic and practical issues both in the EU and in Bulgaria. How to determine and measure the competitiveness of organic farms, what are the decisive factors and guidelines for increasing their competitiveness at the modern stage of development - despite the discussions, these problems are still on the agenda now. Both the EU and Bulgaria promote the implementation of sustainable agricultural practices such as nutrient management plans, soil improvement, precision farming, organic farming, use of legumes in crop rotation schemes, as well as substitution where possible, of mineral fertilizers with organic fertilizers. In 2023, the EC is also expected to adopt an action plan for integrated nutrient management. Organic farming (OF) favors nature and society as a production system that contributes to the reduction of air, soil and water pollution; to increase biodiversity, strengthen the sustainability of agriculture, to ensure healthy food and clean nature for current and future generations, and as such it organically fits into the requirements of the new CAP.
The purpose of the study is to identify and analyze the state, level and factors determining the competitiveness of OF through the analysis of information from a survey of organic farms. The complex influence of various factors determining the development of the sector and the competitive advantages of farms are reported, the main problems and challenges facing it are identified, as well as the prospects for its development. This could provide guidance for its development as a component and instrument of state agricultural policy in terms of sustainable management of natural resources, compliance with high standards of food quality and safety and animal welfare, as well as for the development of viable rural areas. The methodology uses a mixed approach combining quantitative and qualitative methods – literature review, comparative, institutional and multicriteria analysis, grouping method, value-metric and qualitative analysis, survey and expert evaluation method.
This material presents the results of an empirical research-survey on the competitiveness of agricultural holdings, including organic farms. Survey information is from the summer of 2020, provided with the assistance of National Agricultural Advice Service, by farm managers of different production specialization, type and geographic location. The sample is not representative, but provides information for analyses and formulation of conclusion. The main behavioral, economic, institutional, and natural factors that influence the competitiveness of farms in organic agriculture have been identified. The intentions of the agricultural producers in OF related to the further development of organic production in the near future have also been determined. Based on the conducted survey, it can be concluded that farms with organic production in the medium term have good competitiveness and the prospects for its future development are promising. This study represents only part of the big picture of the level of competitiveness of organic agriculture in our country. The factors, conditions, problems and challenges facing organic farms are complex and require further in-depth and multidisciplinary research, because the competitiveness of organic production includes both economic, social and environmental aspects, as well as production and consumption aspects.
References
Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009). Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review. British food journal, 111(10), 1140-1167.
Altieri, M. (1995) Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture. Westview Press, Colorado.
Badgley, C., Moghtader, J., Quintero, E., Zakem, E., Chappell, M. J., Aviles-Vazquez, K., ... & Perfecto, I. (2007). Organic agriculture and the global food supply. Renewable agriculture and food systems, 22(2), 86-108.
Ericksen, P. J., Ingram, J. S., & Liverman, D. M. (2009). Food security and global environmental change: emerging challenges. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(4), 373-377.
Lampkin, N., & Measures, M. (2001). Organic Farm Management Handbook: Organic Farming Research Unit.
Lampkin, N., Measures, M., 2001. Organic Farm Management Handbook: Organic Farming Research Unit. Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth
Mäder, P., Fliessbach, A., Dubois, D., Gunst, L., Fried, P., & Niggli, U. (2002). Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science, 296(5573), 1694 1697.
Porter, J., Costanza, R., Sandhu, H., Sigsgaard, L., & Wratten, S. (2009). The value of producing food, energy, and ecosystem services within an agroecosystem. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 38(4), 186-193.
Pretty, J., Hine, R., (2001). Reducing food poverty with sustainable agriculture: summary of new evidence. In: Final Report from the ‘‘SAFE - World’’ (The Potential of Sustainable Agriculture to Feed the World) Research Project. University of Essex Commissioned by UK Department for International Development (on WWW at http://www2.essex.ac.uk/ces/ResearchProgrammes/CESOccasionalPapers/SAFErep SUBHEADS.htm
Sanders, J., Zanoli, R., Gambelli, D., Padel, S., Orsini, S., Stolze, M., ... & Willer, H. (2016). Distribution of the added value of the organic food chain. Braunschweig: Thünen Institute of Farm Economics.
Sandhu, H. S., Wratten, S. D., Cullen, R., & Case, B. (2008). The future of farming: The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach. Ecological economics, 64(4), 835-848.
Sandhu, H. S., Wratten, S. D., Cullen, R., Hale, R. (2005). Evaluating nature’s services on Canterbury arable farmland. In: A Report Prepared as part of a Research Programme, Funded by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (FRST), entitled: Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Sustainable Agriculture (LINX 0303) with PhD Scholarship Support from the BHU Organics Trust. Lincoln University http://www.lincoln.ac.nz/story_images/1542_Farm Report_s4627.pdf
Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (2012). Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature, 485(7397), 229-232.
Takatsuka, Y., Cullen, R., Wilson, M., & Wratten, S. (2009). Using stated preference techniques to value four key ecosystem services on New Zealand arable land. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 7(4), 279-291.
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418(6898), 671-677
EU. Agricultural Markets Briefs, EC, N13, Organic farming in the EU, a fast growing sector. (2019) https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/food-farming-fisheries/farming/documents/market-brief-organic-farming-inthe-eu_mar2019_en.pdf
Organic farming statistics (2021), https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Organic_farming_statistics
Organic versus conventional farming, which performs better financially? (2013). European Commission, DG Agriculture and Rural Development (2013). Farm Economics Brief.
Organic vs. Conventional agriculture – where’s the profit? (2014). Agricultural and Rural Convention – ARC2020. https://www.arc2020.eu/organic-vs conventional-agriculture-which-one-gives-more-profit/
Action plan for organic production in the EU, https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/farming/organic-farming/organic-action-plan_bg etrans=bg
Национален план за действие за развитие на биологичното производство, https://www.mzh.government.bg/media/filer_public/2020/03/12/bio nacionalen_plan_do_2027_2.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

