Irrigation scheduling under climate uncertainties in North-West Bulgaria

Authors

  • Zornitsa Popova N. Poushkarov Institute of Soil Science, Agrotechnology and Plant Protection (ISSAPPNP), Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Maria Ivanova N. Poushkarov Institute of Soil Science, Agrotechnology and Plant Protection (ISSAPPNP), Sofia, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

Climate Variability and Change, Irrigation scheduling, WinISAREG model, Water Balance, North-West Bulgaria

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to develop alternatives of precise irrigation scheduling for maize crop grown on a Degraded Chernozem soil in Gorni Dabnik experimental field and to define the impact of climate variability and change on irrigation management and yield relative to late and semi-early maize hybrids there over the period 1951-2004. The validated simulation model of water balance, irrigation scheduling and yield impacts of water stress WINISAREG is applied. The studied irrigation options are: (1) refilling soil reservoir to field capacity FC by adopting a management allowed depletion fraction MAD=0.47, i.e. up to 79% of FC, and 90 mm application depths; (2) refilling soil reservoir to FC by adopting a depletion threshold MAD=0.31, i.e. pre-irrigation soil moisture 86% FC, and 60mm application depth; (3) aims at better storage and use of precipitation and irrigation water and consists of partial refilling the soil reservoir to 84% TAW by adopting MAD=0.47 and 60mm application depth. It has been found that: (1) Net irrigation requirements NIR vary from 0-10mm in extremely wet to 80-170 mm in the average, reaching 260 mm in the very dry 1963 of the past 1951-1984 period; (2) Schedule 2 leads to higher irrigation demands (ID) when compared with schedules 1 and 3, under which seasonal precipitation and soil water storage are more efficiently used and irrigation depths (ID) are 30 to 90 mm lower; (3) Relative to present weather condition, drought mitigation measures consists of application of environmentally oriented water saving schedules 1 and 3 with precise irrigation timing; (4) Considering the semi-early maize hybrids, as Pioneer 37-37 and Kneja-2L-611, yield impacts of water stress is mitigated. Yield losses relative to rainfed maize are 15-30% in the average year, while in the very dry year they do not surpass 60% of the potential yield.

References

Alexandrov, V., 2011. (Ed.) Methods for monitoring and estimation of drought vulnerability in Bulgaria. National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Sofia, pp. 216 (BG).

Allen, R.G., L.S. Pereira, D. Raes, M. Smith, 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration – Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, FAO, Rome.

Gregorič, G., 2012. (Ed.) Drought management centre for South-east Europe – DMCSEE Summary of Project results, pp. 55, Published by Slovenian Environmental Agency.

Ivanova, M., Popova Z., 2011. Validation of the FAO methodology for computing ETo with limited data. Application to Sofia field. Agricultural Sciences, XLIV (2): 3-13 (BG).

Pereira, L. S., P. R. Teodoro, P. N. Rodrigues, J. L. Teixeira, 2003. Irrigation scheduling simulation: the model ISAREG, in G. Rossi, L. S. Pereira, A. Zairi (Eds.), Tools for Drought Mitigation in Mediterranean Regions, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 161-180.

Popova, Z., 2008. Optimization of irrigation scheduling, yields and their environmental impacts by crop models, Synthesis of DSc Thesis with extended summary in English, “N. Poushkarov” Institute of Soil Science, S: pp.100 (BG).

Popova, Z., 2012. (Еd). Risk assessment of drought in agriculture and irrigation management through simulation models. ‘‘N. Poushkarov’’ Institute of Soil Science, Sofia, pp. 242 (BG).

Popova, Z., I.Varlev, V. Kutev, E. Ikonomova, 1998. Irrigation and cropping techniques to prevent natural water pollution. Papers of 1st Inter-Regional Conf. “Environment - Water: Innovative Issues in Irrigation and Drainage”, Lisbon, pp: 6-13.

Popova, Z., I.Varlev, I. Gospodinov, 1994. Surge irrigation as an environment friendly technology. Transactions of Regional European Conference of ICID, Varna, Bulgaria, 3 (48): 341-350.

Popova, Z., L. S. Pereira, 2008. Irrigation scheduling for furrow irrigated maize under climate uncertainties in the Thrace plain, Bulgaria, Biosystem engineering. 99(4): 587-597.

Popova, Z., L. S. Pereira, 2011. Modelling for maize irrigation scheduling using long term experimental data from Plovdiv region, Bulgaria. Agricultural Water Management, 98 (4): 675-683.

Popova, Z., M. Ivanova, D. Martins, L. S. Pereira, K. Doneva, V. Alexandrov, M. Kercheva, 2014. Vulnerability of Bulgarian agriculture to drought and climate variability with focus on rainfed maize systems, Natural Hazards, 74 (2):865-886 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Popova, Z., M. Ivanova, D. Martins, L.S. Pereira, M. Kercheva, V. Alexandrov, K. Doneva, 2013. Climate change, agricultural drought and irrigation requirements in Bulgaria. “Water Affairs” Magazine 1/2:14-22 (BG).

Popova, Z., M. Ivanova, L. S. Pereira, V. Alexandrov, M. Kercheva, K. Doneva, D. Martins, 2015. Droughts and climate change in Bulgaria: assessing maize crop risk and irrigation requirements in relation to soil and climate region. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21 (1): 35-53.

Popova, Z., M. Kercheva, L. S. Pereira, 2006. Validation of the FAO methodology for computing ETo with limited data. Application to South Bulgaria. Irrig. and Drain. 55 (1): 201-215.

Popova, Z., R. Kuncheva, 1996. Modeling in Water Losses Evaluation for Nonhomogeneous Furrow Set. (ASCE) Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 122 (1):1-6.

Popova, Z., S. Eneva, L. S. Pereira, 2006. Model validation, crop coefficients and yield response factors for irrigation scheduling based on long-term experiments. Biosystems Engineering. 95 (1): 139-149.

Slavov, N., E. Koleva, V. Alexandrov, 2004. The climate of drought in Bulgaria. In: Knight GG, Raev I, Staneva M (eds.) Drougth in Bulgaria: a contemporary analog for climate change. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot, pp 39–52.

Stewart, J. L., R. J. Hanks, R.E. Danielson, E. B. Jackson, W.O. Pruitt, W. T. Franklin, J. P. Riley, R. M. Hagan, 1977. Optimizing crop production through control of water and salinity levels in the soil. Report PRWG151-1, Utah State Univ., Lo.

Stoyanov, P., 2008. Agroecological potential of maize cultivated on typical soils in the conditions of Bulgaria. Habilitation thesis, “N. Poushkarov” Institute of Soil Science, Sofia, 249 p. (BG).

Varlev, I., Z. Popova, I. Gospodinov, 1998. Furrow surge irrigation as water saving technique. In L. S. Pereira and J.Gowing (Eds.) “Water and the environment: Innovative Issues in Irrigation and Drainage”, Selected papers of the 1st Inter-Regional Conf. “Environment - Water”, Lisbon, pp.131-140 (E&FN Spon-Routledge).

Varlev I., 2008. Potential, efficiency and risk under maize cultivation in Bulgaria. Academy of Agriculture, Sofia, 128 p. (BG)

Zahariev, T., R. Lazarov, S. Koleva, S. Gaidarova, Z. Koichev, 1986. Raionirane na polivnia rejim na selskostopanskite kulturi. [Regional irrigation scheduling of agricultural crops], pp 646. Zemizdat. (BG)

Downloads

Published

20-12-2016

How to Cite

Popova, Z., & Ivanova, M. (2016). Irrigation scheduling under climate uncertainties in North-West Bulgaria. Bulgarian Journal of Soil Science, Agrochemistry and Ecology, 50(3-4), 158-168. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjssae/article/view/2001