T. Aestivum, Spelt, Einkorn and Emmer – Differences and Similarities in Morphological and Technological Aspects

Authors

  • Maria Mangova Institute of Plant Genetic Resources “K. Malkov”, Sadovo, Agricultural academy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

T. spelta, T. monococcum (Einkorn), T. dicoccum (Emmer)

Abstract


 Emerging strategic direction in the development of agriculture and food production that supports sustainable development at various levels (worldwide, EU, national) is organic farming which is currently one of the most regulated and controlled agricultural system. Еspecially in Europe production of ancient wheat genus Triticum was promoted to preserve biodiversity of genetic resources in agriculture. It is consider that T. spelta, T. monococcum (Einkorn) and T. dicoccum (Emmer) have been predestined by nature for cultivation in organic farming, they are not demanding of fertilizers and soils. More over the bulky hulls (25 – 30% of yield) which have to be removed in an addition process protect the kernel against pollution or infections. Despite of advantages, the cultivation of these species has no tradition in Bulgaria. We have reported results of basic morphological and technological parameters of T. spelta, T. monococcum (Einkorn) and T. dicoccum (Emmer) accessions in comparison with quality standard variety Pobeda (T. aestivum). T. spelta has a large grain, shape and 1000 kernel weight like variety Pobeda. Grains of Emmer species are an elongated, those of Еinkorn have shorter and a little flatted shape. All species have lower-vitreousness. T. dicoccum (Emmer) and T. monococcum (Einkorn) have low 1000 kernel weight and SDS – sedimentation value but high content of crude protein (16 – 20%). Despite of this wet gluten from T. monococcum (Еinkorn) was not washed. The extracted flour from T. spelta has a light green hue, good rheological and bread making properties. The extracted flour from T. monococcum (Einkorn) is rich of β-carotene and has a nice yellow colour, but weak rheological and bread making properties.

References

Попов, П., Г. Койнов. 1951. Пшеница. Земиздат, София, 152

Abdel-Aal, E.-S. M., F. W. Sosulski and P. Hucl. 1998. Origins, characteristics and potentials of ancient wheat. Cereal Foods World, 43, 708-715

Berecz, K., L. Simon-Sarcadi, I. Ragasits and S. Hoffmann. 2001. Comparison of protein quality and mineral element concentrations in grain of spelt (Tr. spelta L.) and common wheat (Tr. aestivum L.). Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, vol. 47, p. 389-398

Galova, Z., H. Knoblochova. 2000. Nutritivna Svojstva Sorti Spelta Psenice. Journal Zito Hleb., 27, 4-5, 135-142

Grama, A., Cressy, P. J., Wright, D. S. C., Lynley, T. 1987. Hexaploid wild emmer derivatives grown under new zealand conditions. I. Aspects of milling and baking quality. N. Z. Journal of Agricultural Research., vol. 30(1), 35-45

Reiter, E., M. Werteker, E. Berghofer. 2001. Spelt & Wheat: Differences and similarities in agriculture, nutrition, and technology. Proceedings of XIV International Congress “Cereal Bread 2000”, Novi Sad, 103-106

Smolkova, H., Galova, Z., Gregova, E. 1998. The biochemistry analysis of the technological quality of Triticum spelta L. Wheat Grain. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, vol. 1, 99-103

Smolkova, H. Galova, Z., Lacko-Bartosova, M. 1999. Spelt wheat grain technological quality. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, vol. 2, 45-50

Downloads

Published

29.06.2014

How to Cite

Mangova, M. (2014). T. Aestivum, Spelt, Einkorn and Emmer – Differences and Similarities in Morphological and Technological Aspects. Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science, 51(2-3), 129-132. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjcs/article/view/3676