Effect of Different Modes of Irrigation on Some Biometric Indicators in Soybean

Authors

  • Velika Kuneva Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria Author
  • Alexandar Matev Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria Author
  • Radost Kalaidjieva Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

biometric indicators; irrigation; soybean

Abstract

The aim of the work is, by ANOVA method to analyze the impact of factors irrigation regime and conditions of the year on some biometric identifiers of soybean plant and their influence and interaction. A high degree of reliability and statistically significant is impact on the factors irrigation and year and their interaction of the following biometric indicators: number of internodes of one branch; number of beans in one internode (in central stem); number of beans at one internode (in nodes); number of internodes on the branches of a plant; number of pods per plant (overall). Statistically is not proven relationship between the factors and the following parameters: the height of the first follicle, number of branches per plant, number of grains in a bean (secondary) and number of internodes of the central stem.

References

Barov, V. 1982. Analysis and schemes of the field experience. National Academy of Sciences, Sofia.

Genchev, G., E. Marinkov, V. Yovcheva, A. Ognyanova. 1975. Biometric methods in plant breeding, genetics and selection. Zemizdat, Sofia.

Goranov, Hr. 1977. Irrigation technique as a means of implementing the irrigation regime for corn and soybeans. Dissertation. Sofia.

Kalupchieva, Sl., S. Masheva, V. Yankova. 2010. Characterization of the agrobiological response of garden peas in organic production. Scientific works of the Academy of Sciences – Plovdiv, vol. LV, 1, 87-92

Petrova, R., A. Matev. 2013. Productivity of soybean grown under water deficit conditions during the individual phases of the vegetation. Plant Sciences, vol. L, № 4-5, 36-42

Petrova, R., A. Matev, Zh. Zhivkov. 2012. Productivity of soybeans grown under regulated water deficit. Agricultural Science, vol. 45, no. 3, 35-43

Petrovska, N., V. Valkova. 2010. Correlation and regression relationships between grain yield, yield elements and some biometric indicators in synthetic corn populations. Scientific works of the Academy of Sciences – Plovdiv, vol. LV, book 1, 165-170

Lakin, G. 1990. Biometrics. Higher School, Moscow.

Cucci, G., A. de-Caro, M. A. Mastro. 1989. Risposta produtiva della soia a diversi regimi nel metapontino. Irriga zione e Drenaggio, 36: 4, 166-169

D’Andria, R., F. Q. Chiaranda, P. Tedesch, P. Salzillo. 1991. Risposta di due varieta di soia (Glycine max L. Merr.) a regimi irrigui diversi. Nota II. Dinamica della fioritura. Rivi sta di Agronomia, 25, 4, 527-532

Heatherly, L. G., C. D. Elmore. 1986. Irrigation and planting date effects on soybean grown on clay soil. Agrono my Journal, 78, 4, 576-580

Hutchinson, R. 1983. Soybean irrigation management tests. Northeast Research Station, 147-154 Klik, A., P. Cepuder. 1991. Irrigation of soybeans improves quality. Forderungsdinst, 39, 11, 322-324

Moftah, A. E. 1997. The response of soybean plants, grown under different water regimes, to antitranspirants application. Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor, 35, 1, 263-292

Pritoni, G., G. Venturi, M. T. Amaducci. 1992. Regime idrigo e accrescimento in soia (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Rivis ta di Agronomia, 26, 4, 785-790

Scopel, E., R. Poumet, D. Come, F. Corbineau. 1992. Alimentation en eau d’une culture de semences de soja au cours de la floraison. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Seeds: basic and applied aspects of seed biolo gy. Angres, France, 20 – 24 July, Vol. 3, 1993, 963-968

Zhivkov, Zh., A. Matev. 2012. Irrigation as a factor for obtaining high yields of soybeans grown in the Sofia region. –In: Scientific works of the Academy of Sciences – Plov div, vol. LVI, 249-258

Downloads

Published

26.02.2015

How to Cite

Effect of Different Modes of Irrigation on Some Biometric Indicators in Soybean. (2015). Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science, 52(1), 29-35. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjcs/article/view/3279