Growth reaction of seedlings of common winter wheat varieties to solutions of different osmotic pressures

Authors

  • Radoslav Chipilski Institute of Plant Genetic Resources “Konstantin Malkov”, Sadovo, Agricultural academy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Konstantina Kocheva Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, Sofia, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria Author
  • Georgi Georgiev Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, Sofia, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

common winter wheat; injury index; osmotic stress; seedlings

Abstract

Growth activity of 5-days-old seedlings of common winter wheat varieties grown on conditions of osmotic stress was evaluated on the basis of accumulated biomass, growth depression, injury index and water content. Seeds of Bulgarian varieties Katya, Gines, Geya-1 and Nikki from three vegetation years 2012-2014 were used. Seedlings were subjected to osmotic stress for 48 hours in thermostat by sucrose solutions with water potentials of -0.55 and -1.33 MPa. It was found that in the varieties Gines and Geya-1 the coleoptile fresh and dry mass were less negatively affected by the applied stress than in the variety Nikki, and in Gines and Geya-1 the coleoptile length was bigger than in Nikki. Katya and Gines showed higher water content of shoot under moderate stress (-0.55 MPa) which correlates with depression in organ growth. The severe water stress of -1.33 MPa induced similar depression in organ growth with no varietal differences. Based on these parameters, it was estimated that Nikki was most sensitive to mild and severe water stress compared with the studied varieties. Regression correlation curves of shoot dry mass and water content and dry mass and depression coefficient under moderate stress for Katya, Gines and Geya-1 proved that these varieties possessed adaptive mechanisms towards stress unlike Nikki.

References

ADSS (Agricultural Decision Support System) (2012). Romania-Bulgaria Cross Border Cooperation Program, http://www.ysys.ro/icdpp/

Aliyev, J. A. (2012). Physiological and molecular bases of drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum L.) genotypes. In: Environmental science, engineering and technology. Drought: new research, 2, 47-95.

Blum, A. (2005). Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential - are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive?. Crop and Pasture Science, 56(11), 1159-1168.

Blum, A. & Ebercon, A. (1981). Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Science, 21(1), 43-47.

Blum, A., Sinmena, B. & Ziv, O. (1980). An evaluation of seed and seedling drought tolerance screening tests in wheat. Euphytica, 29(3), 727-736.

Bozhanova, V. (1997). Investigation on drought resistance of durum wheat through plant depression by osmotic stress. In: II-th Science Conference “Problems of fiber crops and cereal crops”, Chirpan, vol. 24, 78-83.

Bozhanova, V. & Dechev, D. (2010). Heritability of osmo regulation ability at durum wheat. Agricultural Science and Technology, 2(4), 169-173.

Chipilski, R. (2014). Study of drought resistance of variet ies common winter wheat grown in condition of con trolled irrigation. In: Ekologia i zdrave, Proceedings of Хth Jubilee National Science and Technical Conference, Plovdiv, 05.06.2014, 153-159 (Bg).

Chipilski, R. & Georgiev, G. (2013). Relationship between water regime, biomass and yield of recent cultivars com mon winter wheat grown in conditions of controlled irrigation. Pochvoznanie, Agrohimiya i Ekologiya, 47(4), 60-69 (Bg).

Chipilski, R., Desheva, G., & Kyosev, B. (2014). Evalua tion of tolerance to osmotic stress of winter bread wheat genotypes using indirect physiological method. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 26(9), 800-806.

Dhanda, S. S., Sethi, G. S. & Behl, R. K. (2002). Inheri tance of seedling traits under drought stress conditions in bread wheat. Cereal Research Communications, 30(3-4), 293-300.

Dreccer, M. F., Ogbonnaya, F. C. & Borgognone, G. (2004). Sodium exclusion in primary synthetic wheats. In: Proc. XI Wheat Breeding Assembly, Sept. 21-24, Canberra, Australia, 118-121.

Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campanile, R. G., Ricciardi, G. L. & Borghi, B. (1997). Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 77(4), 523-531.

Georgiev, G. & Valchev, D. (1990). Comparatively study of physiological methods for water exchange estimate of young barley plants for drought resiststance. In: Yubileyna nauchna sesiya na Institut po echemika - Karnobat, 82-90 (Bg).

Georgiev, G. & Valchev, D. (1991). Protective action of coat ing with some plastic film antitranspirants оn water rela tions and grain yield quantity and quality of bагley under conditions of dry hot wind. In: Рlant metabolism regula tion. In: Рroc. 5th Internat. Symp., Varna, 6, 363-367.

Hsiao, T. C. (1973). Plant responses to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 24(1), 519-570.

Kocheva, K. V., Georgiev, G. I. & Kochev, V. K. (2005). A diffusion approach to the electrolyte leakage from plant tissues. Physiologia Plantarum, 125(1), 1-9.

Kumar, A. & Sharma, S. (2007). Genetics of excised-leaf water loss and relative water content in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cereal Research Communica tions, 35(1), 43-52.

Morgan, J. M., & Tan, M. K. (1996). Chromosomal location of a wheat osmoregulation gene using RFLP analysis. Functional Plant Biology, 23(6), 803-806.

Premachandra, G. S., Saneoka, H., Fujita, K. & Ogata, S. (1992). Leaf water relations, osmotic adjustment, cell membrane stability, epicuticular wax load and growth as affected by increasing water deficits in sorghum. Journal of Experimental Botany, 43(12), 1569-1576.

Szilagyi, L. (2003). Influence of drought on seed yield com ponents in common bean. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology, (Special Issue), 320-330.

Turner, N.C. (1981). Techniques and experimental ap proaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant and Soil, 58(1), 339-366.

Todorovska, E. G., Bozhanova, V., Dechev, D. & Valkova, N. (2014). Osmoregulation capacity in Bulgarian durum wheat. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 28(5), 786-797.

Tonev, Т., Krasteva, H., Bakardzhieva, N., Milanova, N., Zarkov, B., Tsankov, G., Dekov, О. & Iliev, I. (2008). Guidance for integrate management of pests of cereal crops, MZG, Sofia, 2008 (Bg).

Vaisi, Z. & Farshadfar, E. (2011). Correlation between f ield and laboratory indicators of drought tolerance in wheat-barley disomic addition lines. Annals of Biologi cal Research, 2(6), 546-553.

Valchev, D. (2007). Problems, achievements and perspec tives in breeding of drought resistance and cold resis tance of barley. Field Crop Studies, 4(1), 5-18 (Bg).

Vasilev, А., Zlatev, Z., Berova, M. & Stoeva, N. (2010). Plant drought tolerance and heat tolerance - physiology mechanisms and approaches for selection of tolerant genotypes. Agrarni Nauki, 2(4), 59-64 (Bg).

Zarei, L., Farshadfar, E., Haghparast, R., Rajabi, R. & Badieh, M. M. S. (2007). Evaluation of some indirect traits and indices to identify drought tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 6(8), 1204-1210.

Published

02.02.2017

How to Cite

Chipilski, R., Kocheva, K., & Georgiev, G. (2017). Growth reaction of seedlings of common winter wheat varieties to solutions of different osmotic pressures. Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science, 54(1), 15-29. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjcs/article/view/3018