Qualitative traits variation in barley landraces (Hordeum vulgare L.) from Algeria using Shannon-Weaver diversity index

Authors

  • Hafida Rahal-Bouziane Algerian National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRAA) - Plant Genetic Resources - Baraki, Algiers, Algeria Author
  • Samia Yahiaoui Algerian National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRAA) - Plant Genetic Resources - Baraki, Algiers, Algeria Author
  • Samira Merdas Algerian National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRAA) - Plant Genetic Resources - Baraki, Algiers, Algeria Author
  • Saliha Berkani Algerian National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRAA) - Plant Genetic Resources - Baraki, Algiers, Algeria Author
  • Souad Nait-Merzoug Algerian National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRAA) - Plant Genetic Resources - Baraki, Algiers, Algeria Author
  • Aissa Abdelguerfi National High School of Agronomy - El Harrach (ENSA) Author

Keywords:

barley; botanical traits; diversity; resilience

Abstract

Variations in useful barley botanical traits are very important among others for improvement and food security. This study was done on 29 Algerian barley landraces from Sahara in presence of four controls and aimed to evaluate the variability among these barley genotypes through nine descriptive traits using Shannon-Weaver diversity index (H’). Results showed a great variation existing within the landraces for the majority of the traits studied. Indeed, high values of Shannon-Weaver diversity index were obtained for the curvature of first rachis segment (0.99), the pigmentation of awn tips (0.95), length of rachilla hair in grain (0.88), the disposition of lodicules in the fertile grain (0.85), lemma awn barbs (0.76) and spike density (0.61). H’ was intermediate for lemma type in grain (0.55) and was low for the glume length compared to grain and for the spike shape (0.33 and 0.44 respectively). The high diversity found for some important botanical traits related to seeds and spikes among barley cultivars open large perspectives for breeding programs on this germplasm and is beneficial for conservation, resiliency and for adapting to environmental variations especially those related to climate change.

References

Abay, F., Bjørnstad, A. & Smale M. (2009). Measuring on farm diversity and determinants of barley diversity in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Momoma Ethiopian J. Sci. (MEJS), volume 1 (2), 44-66.

Assefa, A., Labuschagne, M.T. & Maarten, H., (2010). Genetic Variability in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Landraces from Ethiopia as Measured by Morphological Characters and SDS-page of Seed Storage Proteins. Ethiop. J. Agric. Sci., 20, 64-81.

Brown, A. H. D. (2008). Indicators of Genetic Diversity, Genetic Erosion and Genetic Vulnerability for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Thematic Background Study. FAO. 27 p.. www.fao.org/fileadmin/.../PGRFA_Indicators_Thematic_Study.pdf

Della, A. (1985). Description of the barley cultivars Athenais and Kantara. Agricultural Research Institute. Miscellaneous reports 21. Nicosia, Cyprus. 12 p. From: news.ari.gov.cy › publications › mr21-della

Derbew, S., Mohammed, H. & Urage, E. (2013). Phenotypic diversity for qualitative characters of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landrace collections from Southern Ethiopia. Int J. of Sci. and Res. (IJSR,) 2 (9), 34-40.

Evans, L.T., Bingham, J., Jackson, P. & Sutherland, J. (1972). Effect of awns and drought on the supply of photosynthate and its distribution within wheat ears. Ann Appl. Biol., 70, 67-76.

FAO. (2015) Manual of morphological variety description for released varieties of wheat and barley in Lebanon. www.fao.org/3/a-bc952b.pdf

Fekadu, A., Woldesenbet, F. & Tenaw, S. (2018). Qualitative variation in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces from the southern highlands of Ethiopia. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 10 (5), 258-264.

Gepts, P. (2006) Plant genetic resources conservation and utilization: the accomplishments and future of a societal insurance policy. Crop Sci., 46, pp. 2278-2292.

Govindaraj, M., Vetriventhan, M. & Srinivasan, M. (2015). Importance of Genetic Diversity Assessment in Crop Plants and Its Recent Advances: An Overview of Its Analytical Perspectives. Genet Res. Int. Vol. 2015, Article ID 431-487, 14 pages.

Hennik, S., & Zeven, A. C. (1991). The interpretation of Nei and Shannon-Weaver within population variation indices. Euphytica, 51, pp. 235-240.

Heslop-Harrison, Y., & Heslop-Harrison, J.S. (1996). Lodicule function and filament extension in the grasses: potassium Ion movement and tissue specialization. Ann. Botany, 77, pp. 573-582.

Honda, I., Turuspekov, Y., Komatsuda, T. & Wa¬tanabe, Y. (2005). Morphological and physiological analysis of cleistogamy in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Physiologia Plantarum, 124(4), 524-531. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00541.x

IPGRI. (1994). Descriptors for barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.

Jain, S.K., Qualset, C.O., Bhatt, G.M. & Wu, K.K. (1975). Geographical patterns of phenotypic diversity

in a world collection of durum wheat. Crop Sci., 15, pp. 700-704.

Jakob, S.S., Rödder, D., Engler, J.O., Shaaf, S., Özkan, H., Blattner, F.R. & Kilian, B. (2014). Evolutionary history of wild barley (Hordeum vulgare Subsp. spontaneum) analyzed using multilocus sequence data and paleodistribution modeling. Genome Biol. Evol., 6 (3), 685-702.

Jaradat, A.A., Shahid, M. & Al Maskri, A. Y. (2004). Genetic diversity in the Batini barley landrace from Oman: I. Spike and seed quantitative and qualitative traits. Crop Sci., 44, pp. 304-315.

Kemelew, M. & Alemayehu, A. (2011). Diversity and agronomic potential of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces in variable production system, Ethiopia. World J. Agric. Sci., 7 (5), 599-603.

Khajavi, A., Aharizad, S. & Ahmadizadeh, M. (2014). Genetic diversity of promising lines of barley based on phenol-morphological traits in Ardabil area. Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biomed. Res., Volume 2, Issue 2, 456-462. http://www.ijabbr.com

Li, Y., Chen, D., Walker, C. N. & Angus, J. F. (2010). Estimating the nitrogen status of crops using a digital camera. Field Crops Res., 118, 221–227.

McMullan, J. L. (1968). Identifying the grain of barley varieties in Western Australia. J. Department Agric., Western Australia Series 4 Vol. 9: No. 11, Article 2.Available at: http://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4/vol9/iss11/2

Mengistu, D. K., Kiros, A. Y. & Pè, M E. (2015). Phenotypic diversity in Ethiopian durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var.durum) landraces. The Crop Journal, 3, pp. 190-199.

Muñoz-Amatriaín, M., Cuesta-Marcos, A., Endelman, J. B., Comadran, J., Bonman, J. M., Bockelman, H. E., Chao, S., Russe, l. J., Waugh, R., Hayes, P. M., & Muehlbauer, G. J. (2014). The USDA Barley Core Collection: Genetic Diversity, Population Structure, and Potential for Genome-Wide Association Studies. PLoS ONE, 9(4): e94688. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094688.

Negassa, M. (1985). Geographical distribution and genotypic diversity of resistance to powdery mildew of barley in Ethiopia. Hereditas, 102, pp. 113-121.

Nilan, R. A., (1964). The cytology and genetics of barley. Res. Studies 32(1), Washington State University, Pullman, WA.

Neergaard, P. (1977). Factors inherent in the host affecting establishment and course of disease. In: Seed pathology. Vol. I. The McMillan press.

Rahal-Bouziane, H. (2006). Agro-morphological characterization of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivated in oases in the Adrar region (Algeria). Magidter thesis, ENSA (ex INA) of EL Harrach, Algeria. (Caractérisation agro morphologique des orges (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivées dans les oasis de la région d’Adrar (Algérie). Thèse de magister, ENSA (ex INA) d’EL Harrach, Algérie.

Rahal-Bouziane, H., Berkani, S., Merdas, S., Nait-Merzoug, S. & Abdelguerfi, A. (2015). Genetic diversity of traditional genotypes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Algeria by pheno-morphological and agronomic traits. African Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 10 (31), 3041-3048.

Ramanujam, S., Tiwari, A. S. & Mehra, R .B. (1974). Genetic divergence and hybrid performance in agronomic crops. Theor. Appl. Genet., 45, pp. 211-214.

Rebetzke, G. J., Bonnet, D. G. & Reynolds, M. P. (2016). Awn reduce grain number to increase grain size and harvestable yield in irrigated and rainfed spring wheat. J. Exp. Bot., vol. 67, № 9, pp. 2573-2586.

Sarma, P., & Das, D. (2015). Application of Shannon’s index to study diversity with reference to sencus data of Assam. Asian J. Manag. Res., Vol. 5 issue 4, pp. 620-628.

Sparks, G. A. & Malcolm, J. P. (1978). Barley identification by grain characters in New Zealand. N.Z. J. Exp. Agric., 6, pp. 1-10.

Taibi, W., Bellatreche, A., Kharsi, M. & Gaouar, S. B. S. (2019). Phenotypic diversity for quantitative and qualitative characters (Hordeum vulgare) accession from Algeria. Biodiversitas, vol.20, №12, pp. 3794-3803.

Tilman, D., Reich, P., Knops, J., Wedin, D. & Mielki, T. (2001). Diversity and productivity in a long term grassland experiment. Science, 294, pp. 843-845.

Ullrich, S. E. (2011). Significance, adaptation, production, and trade of barley. Barley: Production, Improvement and Uses, 3-13.

Usubaliev, B., Brantestam, A.K., Salomon, B. & Garkava-Gustavson, L. (2013). Genetic diversity in farmer grown barley material from Kyrgyzstan. Genetic Resour. Crop Ev., 60, 1843-1858. Doi: 10. 1007/s 10 722-013-9959-2.

Villa, T., Maxted, N., Scholten, M. & Ford-Lloyd, B. (2005). Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genet. Res., 3(3), 373-384. Doi: 10.1079/PGR200591

Von Bothmer, R., von. Jacobsen, N., Baden, C., Jmgensen, R. B. & Linde-Laursen, I. (1995). An Eco geographical study of the genus Hordeum. Second ed. Systematic and Ecogeographic Studies on Crop Genepools 7, IPGRI, Rome.

Von Bothmer, R., Sato, K., Komatsuda, T., Yasuda, S. & Fischbeck, G. (2003). The domestication of cultivated barley. Dev in Plant Genet and Breed 7, pp. 9-27.

Downloads

Published

07.12.2020

How to Cite

Qualitative traits variation in barley landraces (Hordeum vulgare L.) from Algeria using Shannon-Weaver diversity index. (2020). Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science, 57(6), 41-47. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjcs/article/view/2513