Influence of the type of insemination of the queen bee on her egg-laying activity

Authors

  • Tsvetan Tsvetanov Institute of Animal Science – Kostinbrod, Agricultural Academy, Sofia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1118-3864
  • Ralitsa Balkanska Institute of Animal Science – Kostinbrod, Agricultural Academy, Sofia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3486-1514
  • Maia Ignatova Institute of Animal Science – Kostinbrod, Agricultural Academy, Sofia Author
  • Ivona Dimitrova University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

artifical and natural iseminated queen bees, egg-laying activity of queen bees, honey bee (Apis mellifera mellifera L.), quantity of sealed brood

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine the influence of the type of insemination of the queen bee artificial and natural) on her egg-laying activity. The experiment was conducted in 2021 at three apiaries (№ 5063-004 and 5063-0018, located in the village of Bukovets, and apiary № 5185-0506 in the village of Radanovo), separated from each other by more than 5 km in the district Veliko Tarnovo. Two queen bee lines from each apiary are used – Line 1 (LM-20) and Line 2 (LM-45). Two groups of bee colonies were formed from each line. Each group consisted of 6 bee colonies with artificial inseminated queen bees and 6 bee colonies with natural inseminated queen bees. Queen bees from the group of the artifical inseminated bee colonies were inseminated once with 10 μl of seminal fluid at the age of 8 days from their hatching. Artifical inseminated queen bees showed higher values of the egg-laying activity in the individual seasons (spring and autumn) compared to natural iseminated queen bees. The differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). A statistically significant
difference (p < 0.001) was found between the two queen bee lines LM-20, LM-45.

References

Boigenzahn, C., & Pechhacker, H. (1993). Über die Art der Anpaarung. Bienenvater, 114, 151-152.

Buescu, Е., Gurău, M. R. & Bîrțoiu. A. I. (2015). Artificial insemination on Apis mellifera – aspects of artificial inseminated queen performances and factors that may affect their performance. In: Proceedings of the Romanian Academy – Series B, 1, 21-24.

Cermák, K. (2004). Evaluation of artificially inseminated and naturally mated bee queens in Zubri, Czech Republic. Vcelarstvi, 57, 148– 149.

Cobey, S. (1983). The development of instrumental insemination. American Bee Journal, 123, 108-111.

Cobey, S. W. (2016). An introduction to instrumental insemination of honey bee queens. Bee World, 93(2), 33-36.

Cobey, S. W., Tarpy, D. R., & Woyke, J. (2013). Standard methods for instrumental insemination of Apis mellifera queens. Journal of Apicultural Research, 52(4), 1-18.

Gerula, D. (1999). Comparison of honey production of caucasian and carniolan bees in years with nectar flow and honeydew flow. Pszcelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe, 43, 59-69.

hajj, H. S., VChahal, B. S., & Brar, H. S. (1992). Fabrication of queen trap for Apis mellifera L. and studies on the premating period. Indian Bee Journal, 5, 63-67.

Khan, K. A., Rafique, M. K., Lashari, M. A., Iqbal, A., Mahmood, R., Ahmed, A. M., Khoso, F. N., Ahmad, S., AL-Shehri, B. M., Mohammed, M. E., & Ghramh, H. A. (2022). Instrumental insemination: A nontraditional technique to produce superior quality honey bee (Apis mellifera) queens. Journal of King Saud University – Science, 34(5), 1-10.

Konopacka, Z. (1987). Biological quality of instrumentally inseminated queens. In: Proceeding XXXIst International Apimondia Congress, Warsaw, 163-167.

Laidlaw, H. H. (1987). Instrumental insemination of honeybee queens: its origin and development. Bee World, 68(1), 17-36.

Nelson, D. L., & Laidlaw, H. H. (1988). An evaluation of instrumentally inseminated queens shipped in packages. American Bee Journal, 128, 279-280.

Oertel, E. (1940). Mating flights of the queen bee, Glean. Bee Culture, 68, 292-293.

Prabucki, J., Jasinski, Z., & Chuda-Mickiewicz, B. (1987). The results of mass insemination of bee queen inseminated onefold and twofold and stocked in different ways. In Proc. XXX1st International Apimondia Congress, Warsaw, Poland (pp. 169-174).

Seeley, T. D. (1985). Honeybee Ecology: A Study of adaptation in social life. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Szalai, E. (1995). Results of instrumental insemination of queen honey bees in Hungary, Pszcelnicze Zeszyty Nnaukowe, 39, 61-69.

Uygur, Ș. Ö., Karaca, Ü., & Takma, Ç. (2015). Comparison of some performance characteristics for naturally mated and artificially inseminated honey bee queen bees. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 52(1), 79-83.

Woyke, J. (1979). Effect to the access of worker honey-bees to the queen on the results of instrumental insemination. Journal of Apicultural Research, 19(2), 136-143.

Woyke, J., & Jasinski, Z. (1982). Influence of the number attendant workers on the number of spermatozoa entering the spermatheca of instrumentally inseminated queens kept outdoor in mating nuclei. Journal of Apicultural Research, 21(3), 129-133.

Woyke, J., & Jasinski, Z. (1979). Number of workers bees necessary to attend instrumentally inseminated queens kept in an incubator. Apidologie, 10(2), 149-155.

Woyke, J., & Jasinski, Z. (1980). Influence of the number of attendant workers on the results of instrumental insemination of honeybee queens kept at room temperature. Apidologie, 2, 173-180.

Published

27.02.2023

How to Cite

Tsvetanov, T., Balkanska, R., Ignatova, M., & Dimitrova, I. (2023). Influence of the type of insemination of the queen bee on her egg-laying activity. Bulgarian Journal of Animal Husbandry, 60(1), 30-36 (Bg). https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjah/article/view/7