Carbon retention in wetlands under different anthropogenic pressures: effects of reed mowing and pollution in the Burgas lake Ramsar sit

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61308/NULL2221

Keywords:

wetlands, carbon sequestration, ecosystem services, reed mowing, anthropogenic pressure, Burgas lake, RAMSAR site, soil nutrients

Abstract

Wetlands are acknowledged as important resources for carbon storage, yet their capacity to facilitate longterm carbon storage is extremely susceptible to human influence. Here, we evaluate the impacts of various management regimes on carbon retention at the Burgas lake RAMSAR site, Bulgaria - a wetland of international importance that also supports rich biodiversity. We conducted field soil analyses and satellite observations to assess unmanaged, occasionally mown, regularly managed and polluted wetland areas. Soil samples collected in July 2025, revealed clear contrasts: the unmanaged site contained the highest carbon and nitrogen levels, while mown and polluted sites showed reduced carbon retention and altered nutrient balances. Electrical conductivity was significantly elevated in the polluted zone, reflecting anthropogenic pressure. Remote sensing indicators, derived from Sentinel-2 (NDVI, NDRE, MSAI2, NBR, NDWI), showed vegetation productivity, chlorophyll content, soil background effects, moisture and structural disturbance. High positive correlations were noted as a result for the soil carbon, as an index with the vegetation indices and negative correlations with pH and moisture proxies. These results reveal how management and disturbance determine the carbon dynamics in wetlands, and show the benefit of combination of soil and remote sensing methods. The findings are the basis to guide research and implement evidence-based solutions for restoring and managing wetlands, and promoting the carbon sequestration ability of wetlands, without jeopardizing ecological soundness.

References

Abdelmajeed, A. Y. A., & Juszczak, R. (2024). Challenges and Limitations of Remote Sensing Applications in Northern Peatlands: Present and Future Prospects. Remote Sensing, 16(3), 591, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16030591.

Bansal, S., Creed, I. F., Tangen, B. A., Bridgham, S. D., Desai, A. R., Krauss, K. W., ... & Zhu, X. (2023). Practical guide to measuring wetland carbon pools and fluxes. Wetlands, 43(8), 105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-023-01722-2.

Cooray, I. G., Chalmers, G., & Chittleborough, D. (2024). The impact of sampling depths on quantification of soil organic carbon stock in mangrove environments. Catena, 246, 108398, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108398.

European Topic Centre on Urban, Land and Soil systems (ETC/ULS). (2021). Carbon pools and sequestration potential of wetlands in the European Union (ETC/ULS Report 10/2021). European Environment Agency. https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-di/products/etc-di-products/etc-uls-report-10-2021-carbon-pools-and-sequestration-potential-of-wetlands-in-the-european-union/@@download/file/Carbon%20pools%20and%20sequestration%20potential.pdf (last accessed 12.11.2025).

Gao, B. C. (1996). NDWI – A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 58(3), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00067-3.

Gitelson, A. A., & Merzlyak, M. N. (1994). Quantitative estimation of chlorophyll-a using reflectance spectra: Experiments with autumn chestnut and maple leaves. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 22(3), 247-252, https://doi.org/10.1016/1011-1344(93)06963-4.

Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18-27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031.

Huete, A. R. (1988). A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment, 25(3), 295-309, https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X.

Kumar, S., & Sharma, L. K. (2025). Assessing spatial and seasonal variability in soil organic carbon fractions of teal carbon in semi-arid Ramsar wetlands of India as a natural climate solution. Discover Soil, 2(1), 66, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-025-00085-w.

Li, L., Xu, H., Zhang, Q., Zhan, Z., Liang, X., & Xing, J. (2024). Estimation methods of wetland carbon sink and factors influencing wetland carbon cycle: A review. Carbon Research, 3(1), 50, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-024-00135-y.

Lobell, D. B., Di Tommaso, S., Burke, M., & Kilic, T. (2021). Twice is nice: The benefits of two ground measures for evaluating the accuracy of satellite-based sustainability estimates. Remote Sensing, 13(16), 3160, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163160.

Maxwell, T. L., Spalding, M. D., Friess, D. A., Murray, N. J., Rogers, K., Rovai, A. S., ... & Worthington, T. A. (2024). Soil carbon in the world’s tidal marshes. Nature Communications, 15(1), 10265, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54572-9.

Mistry, P., Creed, I. F., Trick, C. G., Enanga, E., & Lobb, D. A. (2024). Comparison of radiometric techniques for estimating recent organic carbon sequestration rates in inland wetland soils. Biogeosciences, 21(21), 4699-4715.https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4699-2024.

Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., ... & Thépaut, J. N. (2021). ERA5-Land: A state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications. Earth system science data, 13(9), 4349-4383, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021.

Pekel, J. F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N., & Belward, A. S. (2016). High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature, 540(7633), 418-422, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20584.

Sharma, R., Mishra, D. R., Levi, M. R., & Sutter, L. A. (2022). Remote sensing of surface and subsurface soil organic carbon in tidal wetlands: A review and ideas for future research. Remote Sensing, 14(12), 2940, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122940.

Tölgyesi, C., Csikós, N., Temperton, V. M., Buisson, E., Silveira, F. A., Lehmann, C. E., ... & Bede-Fazekas, Á. (2025). Limited carbon sequestration potential from global ecosystem restoration. Nature Geoscience, 18(8), 761-768, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01742-z.

Tucker, C. J. (1979). Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8(2), 127-150, https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0.

Zhang, J., Chu, L., Zhang, Z., Zhu, B., Liu, X., & Yang, Q. (2023). Evolution of Small and Micro Wetlands and Their Driving Factors in the Yangtze River Delta-A Case Study of Wuxi Area. Remote Sensing, 15(4), 1152, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15041152.

Downloads

Published

23-12-2025

How to Cite

Carbon retention in wetlands under different anthropogenic pressures: effects of reed mowing and pollution in the Burgas lake Ramsar sit. (2025). Bulgarian Journal of Soil Science, Agrochemistry and Ecology, 59(4), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.61308/NULL2221