Optimal regional irrigation requirements under changing climate in Bulgaria

Authors

  • Zornitsa Popova Institute of Soil Science, Agrotechnology and Plant Protection Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Ivan Varlev Institute of Soil Science, Agrotechnology and Plant Protection Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Maria Ivanova Institute of Soil Science, Agrotechnology and Plant Protection Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Emil Dimitrov Institute of Soil Science, Agrotechnology and Plant Protection Sofia, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

NIR, TAW, climate

Abstract

Net irrigation requirements (NIR, mm) that fully satisfy crop development and yield formation are basic in irrigation systems’ design and management. Traditionally, Bulgarian practice used to adopt the irrigation scheduling and demands developed by Zahariev et al. (1986) that were based on field experiments carried out in the period 1950-1980 and crop evapotranspiration computed by Delibaltov’s equation. The book consists of tables providing information on 31 crops and 97 irrigation regions (IR) used in design and exploitation of the national irrigation systems till 1990. Years having probability of occurrence of irrigation depth PI=10, PI=25 and PI=50% were considered. Detected climate change and drought aggravation however create uncertainties for irrigation management. To cope with them, simulations were performed for past (1950-1980) and present (1951-2004) weather conditions relative to unified agroclimatic AC regions. In former studies the irrigation scheduling simulation model WinISAREG was calibrated for maize using data from long-term experiments carried out in fields representing diverse soil, climate and management conditions for maize irrigation. Optimal АC regions were defined on the grounds of the average reference evapotranspiration totals for July-August EToJul-Aug relative to the period 1951-2004. Thus, average total EToJul-Aug was an indicator of regional NIR and used in “Zahariev” irrigation regions unification into agroclimatic (АC) regions (table 1). The impacts of soil properties on irrigation requirements were characterised by total available soil water TAW, mm m-1, being “small” if TAW=116 mm m-1, “average” if 136<TAW<157 and “large” when 173<TAW<180 mm m-1. Respective NIR, mm, relative to the period 1951-2004 were computed by model application to soil groups of small and large TAW in each АC region. Results indicate that when average total EToJul-Aug increase from 260 to 330 mm, net irrigation requirements NIR in “average” demand year (PI=50%) increase from 160 to 310 mm for soils of “small” TAW . Such substantial increase reflects the impact of climate diversity in Bulgarian plains on maize irrigation. Relative to past weather 1951-1980 (table 2), unified conventional irrigation depths were compared to those simulated. Results showed that “Zahariev” irrigation requirements were in the range of NIR derived by model application in most of the cases. It was concluded that simulated NIR covered a lager range than that of “Zahariev” estimates since the model took better into account the impact of climate change and different soil water holding capacity TAW. Compiled maps of computed NIR, Meteorological Stations, Irrigation and Macroclimatic regions illustrate the findings of the study. They make clear the position of “wet” and “dry” zones and respective irrigation requirements over the country territory during “the average demand” 1970, “the moderately dry” 1981 and “the very dry” 2000 in the 54-year period.

References

Александров (Ред.), 2011. Методи за мониторинг, оценка и въздействие на сушата в България. София, стр. 216

Делибалтов Й., Х. Христов, И. Цонев, 1959. По въпросът за определяне на водопотреблението на селскостопанските култури. Научни трудове НИИХМ т.4, София

Захариев Т., Р. Лазаров, С. Колева, С. Гайдарова, З. Койчев, 1986. Райониране на поливния режим на селскостопанските култури. Земиздат С. стр. 646.

Иванова М., З. Попова, 2011а. Валидация на методологията на ФАО 56 за изчисляване на ЕТо РМ при ограничени метеорологични данни в Софийско поле. Селскостоп.наука, XLIV(2):3-13.

Иванова M., З. Попова, 2011b. Валидация на модел и коефициенти на културата чрез експерименти с царевица в Софийско поле. Национална конференция с международно участие “100 години почвознание в България”, Институт по почвознание “Н. Пушкаров”, 2:542 548.

Мотева М., В. Казанджиев, В. Георгиева, 2008. Изследване на еталонната евапотранспирация по FAO Penman – Monteith на територията на България.Селскостопанска техника №5:26-32.С.

Попова З., 2007. Валидация на модела ISAREG и на коефициентите на културата при смолница и излужена канелена горска почва в Тракийската равнина. Научни доклади “60-години ИП Н.Пушкаров-Почвознанието основа за устойчиво земеделие и опазване на околната среда”,Ред: Дилкова, Русева, Върлев,Стойчева, Нинов, Бонева и др., стр.397-402.

Попова, З., 2008. Оптимизиране на поливния режим, добивите и влиянието им върху околната среда чрез симулационни модели. Автореферат за дн, ИП ”Н.Пушкаров”, с. 101.

Попова З., (Ред.) 2012. Оценка на рискът от засушаване в земеделието и управление на напояването чрез симулационни модели.ССА,С. стр.242. ISSN 987-954-394-080-6

Попова З., М. Иванова, В. Александров, 2014а. Еталонна евапотранспирация ETo-PM и засушаване в равнините на България – (1) сезонен ход и обезпеченост, Сборник доклади от Втора научна конференция с международно участие „Теория и практика в земеделието“, Юндола, стр. 201-209 ISBN: 978-954-332-114-8

Попова З., М. Иванова, Д. Мартинс, Л. С. Перейра, М. Керчева, В. Александров, К. Донева, 2013. Засушаване и климатични промени в България: тенденции и въздействия върху агросистемата на царевицата, Селскостопанска наука, 46 (1):19-30

Попова З., М. Иванова, К. Донева, 2014b. Изследвания върху поливните режими при променящия се климат в района на Пловдив. Селскост. наука, 47 (1): 3-17 ISSN 1311-3534

Allеn R., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, M. Smith, 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper 56, Rome, p. 300

Liu, Y., J. L. Teixeira, H. J. Zhang, L. S. Pereira, 1998. Model validation and crop coefficients for irrigation scheduling in the North China Plain. Agric. Water Manag. 36:233–246.

Liu, Y., L. S. Pereira, 2001. Calculation methods for reference evapotranspiration with limited weather data. J. Hydraul. Eng. 3, 11–17 (in Chinese).

Moteva M., V.Kazandjiev, V. Georgieva, 2015. The impact of the climate changes during the period 1971-2010 on the reference evapotranspiration in North Bulgaria. Engineering Geology&Hydrogeology, 29:59-68, S, ISSN 0204-7934

Pereira L. S., P. R. Teodoro, P. N. Rodrigues, J. L. Teixeira, 2003. Irrigation scheduling simulation: the model ISAREG. In: G. Rossi, A. Cancelliere, L. S. Pereira, T. Oweis, M. Shatanawi, A. Zairi (Eds.) Tools for Drought Mitigation in Mediterranean Regions. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 161-180.

Pereira L.S., R. G. Allen, M. Smith , D. Raes, 2015, Crop evapotranspiration estimation with FAO56: Past and future. Agricultural Water Management, 147:4–20

Pereira, L.S., J. M. Goncalves, B. Dong, Z. Mao, S. X. Fang, 2007. Assessing basin irrigation and scheduling strategies for saving irrigation water and controlling salinity in the Upper Yellow River Basin, China. Agric. Water Manage. 93 (3):109–122.

Popova Z., L. S. Pereira, 2011. Modeling for maize irrigation scheduling using long term experimental data from Plovdiv region, Bulgaria. Agric. Water Management, 98 (4): 675-683.

Popova Z., M. Ivanova, 2016. Irrigation scheduling under changing Northern Black Sea climate. Int. Sci. J. “Mechanization in agriculture & Conserving of the resources”, LXII (4):2016: 26-29

Popova Z., M. Ivanova, D. Martins, L. S. Pereira, K. Doneva, V. Alexandrov, M. Kercheva, 2014. Vulnerability of Bulgarian agriculture to drought and climate variability with focus on rainfed maize systems, Natural Hazards, 74 (2):865-886 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

Popova Z., M. Ivanova, L. S. Pereira, K. Doneva, V. Alexandrov, P. Alexandrova, M. Kercheva, 2012. Assessing drought vulnerability of Bulgarian agriculture through model simulations, J. of Environmental Sciences and Engineering B,1/8, pp.1017-1036 David publishing ISSN 1934-8932

Popova Z., M. Ivanova, L. S. Pereira, V. Alexandrov, M. Kercheva, K. Doneva, D. Martins, 2015. Drought and climate change in Bulgaria: assessing maize crop risk and irrigation requirements in relation to soil and climate region. BJAS, 21 (1):35-53

Popova Z., M. Ivanova, P. Alexandrova, V. Alexandrov, K. Doneva, L. S. Pereira, 2011. Impact of drought on maize irrigation and productivity in Plovdiv region. Papers proceedings of national conference with international participation “100 years Soil Science in Bulgaria”, Sofia, 1:394-399.

Popova, Z., M. Ivanova, 2015. Crop water requirements in the context of soil characteristics and changing climate in North Bulgaria. Engineering Geology&Hydrogeology, 29:69-84,S, ISSN 0204-7934

Popova, Z., M. Kercheva, L. S. Pereira, 2006a. Validation of the FAO methodology for computing ETo with missing climatic data. Application to South Bulgaria. Irrig.Drain. 55 (2), 201–215.

Popova, Z., S. Eneva, L. S. Pereira, 2006b. Model validation, crop coefficients and yield response factors for maize irrigation scheduling based on long-term experiments. Biosyst. Eng. 95:139–149.

Varlev I., N. Kolev, Y. Kirkova, 1994. Yield – Water relationship and their changes during individual climatic years. 17-th Europ. Reg. Сonference. ICID Varna R. 1.46

Published

20-12-2016

How to Cite

Optimal regional irrigation requirements under changing climate in Bulgaria. (2016). Bulgarian Journal of Soil Science, Agrochemistry and Ecology, 50(3-4), 144-157. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjssae/article/view/1999