Heterosis behaviour of sorghum and sudangrass hybrids in flowering stage

Authors

  • Tz. Kikindonov Agricultural Institute of Shumen, 9700 Shumen, Agricultural Academy, Bulgaria Author
  • K. Slanev Agricultural Institute of Shumen, 9700 Shumen, Agricultural Academy, Bulgaria Author
  • S. Enchev Agricultural Institute of Shumen, 9700 Shumen, Agricultural Academy, Bulgaria Author
  • G. Kinkindonov Agricultural Institute of Shumen, 9700 Shumen, Agricultural Academy, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

heterosis; hybrids; productivity; sorghum; sudangrass

Abstract

 In recent years Sorghum × Sudangrass hybrids are becoming a promising forage crop for production of green mass, especially in conditions of extreme drought during vegetation. The results from tests for productivity heterosis in Sorghum × Sudangrass hybrids in 2009 and 2010 are presented. Reported heterosis effect towards pollinators and the standard varieties enables the selection of hybrids with high yield potential. Perspective hybrids have been selected with proven higher green and dry mass productivity than the standard commercial varieties.

References

Кикиндонов, Ц., Сланев, К., Кикиндонов, Г. 2008. Продуктивност на произходи сорго за зелена маса. Journal of Mountain Agriculture on the Balkans, Vol. 11, 3, 503-511

Лидански, Т. 1988. Статистически методи в биологията и в селското стопанство. Земиздат, София.

Beuberin, J. E., H. A. Fribourg and F. Bell. 1968. Effect of environment and cutting on the regrowth of a sorghum x sudangrass hybrid. Crop Sci., 8, 152-155

Dorgevic-Miloshevic, S., S. Trenkovski, M. Zujovic, S. Ninkivic, D. Negovanovic. 1992. Yield and quality of some Sorghum and Sudan grass genotypes grown in a wet, cold spring. Biotechnologija u Stocarstvy, Vol. 8, 57-63

Fribourg, H. A. 1995. Summer annual grasses. In: R. F. Barner (eds) Forage 5th ed Iowa State Univ. Pres. Ames. IA, 463-471

Kertikov, T. 2007. Study of productivity capacities for production of forage, crude protein and chemical composi tion in sorghum hybrids. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 13, 3, 281-289

Loveras, J., Lopez Fernandez, A., Baga, M., Betbese, J. A., Lopez Querol, A. 2006. Production of forage sorghum biomass in irrigated regions of the Ebro valley. Agricultura, Revista Agropecuaria, 75, 889, 804-807

Pang Liang Yu., Zhang Jian Hua. 2004. Biological characteristics of Sudan grass and Sorghum-sudan hybrid. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 17, 2, 160-163

Rajcakova, L., Mlynar, R., Rajsky, M. 2010. Improvement of quality of silages from sorghum x sudan grass hy brid. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 26, 531-537

Samuil, C. 2007. The effects of diverse technological factors on the productivity potential of sorghum and Sudan grass, under cultivation in Romania. Lucrari Stiintifice, Uni versitatea de Stiinte Agricole Si Medicina Veterinatia lon lonesku de la Brad lasi. Seria Agronomie, 50, 2, 560-565

Snyman, L. D., Youbert, H. W. 1996. Effect of maturity stage and method of preservation on the yield and quality of forage sorghum. Anim. Feed Sci. Techn., 57, 63-73

Uzun, F., Ugur, S., Sulak, M. 2009. Yield, Nutritional and Chemical Properties of Some Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrids. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8, 8, 1602-1608

White, J. B., Kirch, K. and K. Bolsen. 1989. Selecting forage sorghum cultivars for silage. Kanzas State University, Manhattan, Rep. Prog., 568-700

Zamfir, M., S. I. Zamfir. 2001. The study of phenophases variability in Sudan grass [(Sorghum Sudanense Piper. (Staph)]. Analele institutuluide de ceretaru ereale si plante tehnice. Fundulea, Vol. 68: 165-176

Published

30.12.2013

How to Cite

Heterosis behaviour of sorghum and sudangrass hybrids in flowering stage. (2013). Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science, 50(6), 3-6. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjcs/article/view/3937