Crude Protein Content in Seed and Yield of Two-Row Barley Cultivars w=ith Different Geographical Origin

Authors

  • Zapryanka Zapryanka Popova Institute of Plant Genetic Resources “Konstantin Malkov”, Sadovo, Agricultural academy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Nikolay Neykov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources “Konstantin Malkov”, Sadovo, Agricultural academy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Nevenka Ganusheva Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

clusters; combining selection; genetic resources; protein; two-row barley; yield

Abstract

In IPGR – Sadovo are studied 26 two-row barley cultivars with different geographic origin. The results were processed with statistical package SPSS modules with a single factor variance and cluster analysis. It was found that explore the varieties of two-row barley show different values for crude protein content and yield. Some of them Targhee, Vodka, Cameo, Alize, Camelia can be used to improve grain quality in different breeding programs. Klages and Biser, which have the highest crude protein content are suitable for establishment of varieties in the breeding of barley for feed. In combining selection for improving quantitative traits can be successfully included cultivars Alexis, Camelia, Vanesa, Aster and Potok.

References

Мокрева, Т. 2007. Сравнителен анализ на методи за достоверност и връзки при експериментални данни от лозарството. Дисертация.

Atanassov, P., A. M. Zaharieva, P. Vendell and P. Mon neveux. 1999. Genetic and environmental variation of useful traits in a collection of naked barley II. Quality related traits. Cereal Res. Commun., 27(3): 323-330

Brown, A. H. D. 1978. Isozymes, plant population genetic structure and genetic conservation. Theor. Appl. Genet., 52: 145-157

Fan, S. J., Y. Li. G. R. Zhang, X. H. Zhu and F. Cao. 2002. Sifting of protein rich, lysine rich barley and analy ses of genetic distance. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 18(1): 29-34

Frankel, O. 1984. Genetic perspectives of germplasm conservation. |(p. 161-170) In: Genetic manipulation: Im pact on man and society. (Eds.): W. Arber, K. Limensee, W. J. Peacock and P. Starlinger. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

Frankle, O., A. H. D. Brown and J. J. Burdon. 1995. The conservation of plant biodiversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. p. 249

He, W., W. Lu and L. Sun. 1989. Effect of environment on protein and starch content of barley grains. Zuowu Pin zhong Ziyuan, 1: 25-27 (CAB Abstracts 1987)

M. Líšková, H. Frančáková, J. Mareček. 2011. Chang es of crude protein content in malting barley influenced by post-harvest ripening. Journal of Central European Agricul ture, 12(1), 92-102

Sun, L. J., W. Lui, J. Zhang, W. X. Zhang, F. Q. Li, L. H. Chen and Y. C. Ren. 1999. Evaluation and utilization of barley germplasm resources of China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 32(2): 24-31

Vavilov, N. I. 1997. Five Continents. (Eds.): L. E. Rodin, S. Reznik and P. Stapleton, International Board for Plant Ge netic Resources, Rome, Italy. p. 1-197

Published

28.02.2013

How to Cite

Crude Protein Content in Seed and Yield of Two-Row Barley Cultivars w=ith Different Geographical Origin. (2013). Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science, 50(1), 59-62. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjcs/article/view/3746