Structure and Quality Analysis of Yield for Katinka Plum Cultivar

Authors

  • Georgi Popski Research Institute of Mountain Stockbreeding and Agriculture, Troyan 5600, Agricultural аcademy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Boryana Stefanova Research Institute of Mountain Stockbreeding and Agriculture, Troyan 5600, Agricultural аcademy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Ivan Minev Research Institute of Mountain Stockbreeding and Agriculture, Troyan 5600, Agricultural аcademy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

agrotechnics; cultivars; introduction; plum; reproductive manifestations

Abstract

In RIMSA – Troyan, the reproductive manifestations, structure and quality of yield were studied, at an experimental plum plantation with Katinka plum cultivar, under conditions of 2015. It has been found that Katinka plum cultivar develops well and gives fruit in the Central Balkan Mountain region. This cultivar entered early in fruit bearing stage, even in the second year. Fruits reached ripening stage in the end of July. They had purple-blue colouring of fruit skin and weight of 19.2 g. Three variants of soil surface cultivation were studied: 1) autumn fallow, 2) natural grass establishment, 3) artificial grass establishment. A structural fruit analysis was conducted. The greatest percentage of large fruits was gathered in the first – 32.0%, and the third variant – 33.8%. The highest total yield – 618 kg/da, was obtained in the first variant in maintaining of autumn fallow. Intensive attack by Monilia fructigena was reported for the three variants, as almost 1/5 (20 – 24%) of the fruits had damages.

References

Недев, Н. и др. 1979. Методика за изучаване на растителните ресурси при овощните растения. Пловдив.

Попски, Г., Драгойски, К., Стефанова, Б., Динкова, Хр. 2013. Почвено-климатичните и теренни условия в планинските региони – фактори за плодопроизводството. Journal of Mountain Agriculture on the Balkan, v. 16, № 1, 34-49.

Спасова, Т., Минев, И. 2009. Реакция на някои сливови сортове и елити към икономически опасни болести. Растениевъдни науки, 46, с. 33-37.

Blažek, J., Pištěková, I. 2009. Preliminary evaluation results of new plum cultivars in a dense planting. Hort. Sci., 36, (2): 45-54 (Prague).

Ondrásek, I., Gogolková, K. and Krska, B. 2013. A pomological evaluation of plum cultivars in the Czech Republic. Acta Hort. (ISHS), 985: 105-110; http://www.actahort.org/books/985/985_13.htm

Vávra, R. 2012. Evaluation of plum cultivar pro ductivity in commercial orchards in first growing years after planting. Acta Hort. (ISHS), 968: 93-98; http:// www.actahort.org/books/968/968_12.htm

Published

30.12.2015

How to Cite

Structure and Quality Analysis of Yield for Katinka Plum Cultivar. (2015). Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science, 52(6), 58-61. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjcs/article/view/3464