Forage quality characteristics of subterranean clover biomass

Authors

  • Yordanka Naydenova Institute of Forage Crops - 5800 Pleven, Agricultural academy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Viliana Vasileva Institute of Forage Crops - 5800 Pleven, Agricultural academy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

composition; feeding value; forage; in vitro digestibility; subterranean clover

Abstract

Subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) is a widespread component in the pastures of the temperate areas of Central and Northern Europe and America. The results from the studies conducted during the last years in Bulgaria showed that subterranean clover has practical applicability as a component of pasture stands under the climatic conditions of the country. The object of the present work is three subspecies of subterranean clover, i.e., Trifolium subterraneum ssp. brachycalicinum, Trifolium subterraneum ssp. yaninicum and Trifolium subterraneum ssp. subterraneum. They are grown in pure swards and in triple mixtures between them (33: 33: 33%) on the experimental field of the Institute of Forage Crops, Pleven (2011 – 2013). The analysis of composition and enzyme in vitro digestibility show that subterranean clover forage biomass is well balanced by principal chemical composition. The lowest degree of lignifcation and the highest forage quality belong to Trifolium subterraneum ssp. yaninicum, followed by Trifolium subterraneum ssp. brachycalicinum and Trifolium subterraneum ssp. subterraneum. The forage biomass of Trifolium subterraneum ssp. brachycalicinum is distinguished the highest energy feeding value. Forage biomass of subterranean clover mixture composed from the three subspecies is more digestible than the forage of each one subterranean clover subspecies, grown in pure swards. Protein feeding value of forage mixture biomass is high, near to those of Trifolium subterraneum ssp. brachycalicinum.

References

Асьов, Б., А. Петрова, Д. Димитров, Р. Васи лев. 2012. Конспект на висшата флора на България. Хорология и флорни елементи. Четвърто преработено и допълнено издание. Българска фондация биоразнообразие, София, 424 с.

Василев, Е. 2006. Продуктивност на подземна детелина (Tr. subterraneum L.) в пасищни смески с някои многогодишни житни за условията на Цен трална Северна България. Растениевъдни науки, 43, 2, 149-152.

Василева, В. 2014. Продуктивност на суха надземна и коренова маса в тревни смески. Journal of Mountain Agriculture on the Balkans, 17, 4, 956-969.

Василева, В. 2015. Ботаничен състав на тревостои с участие на подземна детелина (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Известия на Съюза на учените – Русе, Аграрни и ветеринарно-медицински науки, 7, 160-165.

Гогушев, Г. 2009. Флористична класификация на дъбовите гори в Западните гранични планини. Лесовъдска мисъл, 1 (37): 54-77.

Илиева, А., В. Василева. 2011. Проучване върху грудкообразуването и нитратредуктазната активност при някои тревни смески. Journal of Moun tain Agriculture on the Balkans, 14, 3, 513-530.

Тодоров, Н., А. Атанасов, А. Илчев, Г. Ганчев, Г. Михайлова, Д. Гиргинов, Д. Пенков, З. Шин дарска, Й. Найденова, К. Неделков, С. Чобавова. 2010. Практикум по хранене на животните. (Под ред. проф. Н. Тодоров). Изток-Запад, София, 463 с. ISBN 978-954-321-733-5

Якимова, Я., Х. Янчева. 1986. Фитоценологични и екологични особености на някои едногодишни детелини в Странджанския рaйон. Растениевъдни науки, 23, 4, 47-53.

SEC. 2009. Работен документ на службите на комисията на европейските общности, придружа ващ Бялата книга за адаптиране спрямо изменението на климата. Адаптиране спрямо изменението на климата: предизвикателство за европейското селско стопанство и селските райони. Комисия на европейските общности, Брюксел, XXX, BG, 1-13.

Akin, D. E., A. Chesson. 1990. Lignification as the major factor limiting forage feeding value especially in warm conditions. In: Proc. XVI Int. Grassland Cong., Vol. III. Association Francaise pour la Production Four ragere. Versailles, France, p. 1753-1760.

Andrieu, J., C. Demarquilly. 1989. Prediction of the digestible and metabolisable energy content of forages from their chemical composition and organic matter digestibility. In: Proceedings (p. 875-876). Pre sented at 16. International Grassland Congress, Nice, France (1989-10-04-1989-10-11). Versailles, FRA: As sociation Française pour la Production Fourragère.

Anwar, A., M. Ansar, M. Nadeem, G. Ahmad, S. Khan, A. Hussain. 2010. Performance of non-tradi tional winter legumes with oats for forage yield under rainfed conditions. J. Agric. Res., 48(2): 171-179

AOAC. 2007. Official methods of analysis, 17-th ed. Association of Analytical Chemists. Gaitensburg, MD, USA.

Aranjueloa, I., C. Arrese-Igor, G. Moleroc. 2014. Nodule performance within a changing environmental context. Journal of Plant Physiology, 171, 1076-1090

Aufrère, J. 1982. Etude de la prévision de la di gestibilité des fourrages par une méthode enzyma tique. Ann. Zootech., 31, 11-30

Availabale. from:/http://msucares.com/crops/forages/legumes/cool/subterraneanclover.html

Carneiro, J. P. 1999. Avaliação de luzernas anuais em solos á cidos, Estudo do efeito de alguns factores com vista ao melhoramento deplantas. Doutoramento em Engenharia Agronomica. Univercidade Técnica de Lisboa.

Frame, J. 2005. Forage legumes for temperate grasslands.Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Plymouth UK: Science Publishers Inc. 320 p.

Frame, J., J. F. L. Charlton, A. S. Laidlaw. 1998. Temperate Forage Legumes. CAB International, Wall ingford, p. 327

Goering, H. K., P. J. Van Soest.1970. Forage Fiber Analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 379.

Gornall, J., R. Betts, E. Burke, R. Clark, L. Camp, K. Willett, A. Wiltshire. 2010. Implications of climate change for agricultural productivity in the early twenty f irst century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365, 2973-2989 INRA. 1988. Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins. R. Jarrige (ed.) INRA Publ., Versailles, France, 471 p.

Kyriazopoulos, A. P., E. M., Abraham, Z. M. Pa rissi, A. S. Nastis. 2008. Herbage production and nutritive value of Dactylis glomerata L. and Trifolium subterraneum L. alone and in mixtures. Options Médi terranéennes, 79, 211-214

Lelièvre, F., F. Volaire. 2009. Current and Potential Development of Perennial Grasses in Rainfed Mediter ranean Farming Systems. Crop Science, 49, 6, 2371 2378. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2009.06.0324

Lemus, R. 2013. Self-reseeding Potential of Annual Clovers. Forage News, Mississippi State University, 6, 1, 1-2

Luscher, A., I. Mueller-Harvey, J. F. Soussana, R. M. Rees, J. L. Peyraud. 2014. Potential of legume based grassland–livestock systems in Europe: a re view. Grass and Forage Science, 69: 206-228

McLaren, S. E., P. T. Doyle. 1994. Dry matter digest ibility of subterranean clover during senescense and af ter death. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod., 20, 221-224

Mihovski, Ts., A. Kirilov. 2014. State of ruminant animals’ stockbreeding and the respective forage base in Bulgaria. Aktualni poznatky v pestovani, slech teni, ochrane rostlin a zpracovani produktu. “Uroda 12/2014, vedecka priloha casopisu”, eds. Badalikova, B. and Bartlova, J. ISSN 0139-6013, 105-110.

Mulholland, J. G., K. S. Nandra, G. H. Scott, A. W. Jones, N. E. Coombes. 1996. Nutritive value of sub terranean clover in a temperate environment. Austra lian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 36, 803-814

Pecetti L., E. Piano. 1998. Leaf size variation in subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L. sensu lato). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 45, 2, 161-165

Pecetti, L., E. Piano. 2002. Variation of morpho logical and adaptive traits in subterranean clover pop ulations from Sardinia (Italy). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 49, 2, 189-197

Piano, E., L. Pecetti, A. M. Carroni. 1996. Cli matic adaptation in subterranean clover populations. Euphytica, Vol. 92, 1-2, 39-44

Porqueddu, C., G. Parente, M. Elsaesser. 2003. Potential of grasslands. In: A. Kirilov, N. Todorov & I. Kat erov (eds.). Grassland Science in Europe, 8, p. 11-20.

Ru, Y. I., J. A. Fortune. 2001. Seed yield and nutri tive value of dry, mature subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 41, 2, 169-175

Ru, Y. J., Fortune J. A. 2000. Variation in nutritive value of plant parts of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 40, 397-403

Ru, Y. J., J. A. Fortune. 1999. Sward character istics and Nutritive Value of two Ciltivars of Subter ranean Clover. Asian-Aus. J. Animal Science, 12, 8, 1192-1199

SPSS. 2012. SPSS Version 20.0. SPSS Inc. 233 S. Wacker Drive Chicago Illinois

Stockdale, C. R. 1992. The nutritive value of sub terranean clover herbage grown under irrigation in Northern Victoria. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 43, 1265-1280

Vasileva, V., E. Vasilev. 2012. Study on Produc tivity of some Legume Crops in Pure Cultivation and Mixtures. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 77, 2, 91-94

Vasileva, V., E. Vasilev, M. Athar. 2011. Nodu lation and root establishment of two clover species grown in pasture mixtures with wheatgrass. FUUAST Journal of Biology, 1, (1): 1-4

Published

29.10.2015

How to Cite

Forage quality characteristics of subterranean clover biomass. (2015). Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science, 52(5), 99-105. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjcs/article/view/3448