Monitoring of flying of plum moth (Grafolita funebrana Tr.) in the region of Troyan under different climate conditions

Authors

  • Severina Valeva Research Institute of Mountain Stockbreeding and Agriculture, Troyan 5600, Agricultural аcademy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Anton Atanasov Research Institute of Mountain Stockbreeding and Agriculture, Troyan 5600, Agricultural аcademy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Georgi Popski Research Institute of Mountain Stockbreeding and Agriculture, Troyan 5600, Agricultural аcademy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Kalin Dragoyski Research Institute of Mountain Stockbreeding and Agriculture, Troyan 5600, Agricultural аcademy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Boryana Stefanova Research Institute of Mountain Stockbreeding and Agriculture, Troyan 5600, Agricultural аcademy, Sofia, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

dynamics of flying; pests; plum; plum moth

Abstract

The study was conducted during 2007 – 2014 in the region of Troyan, which is typical for the production of fruit-tree cultures with its high altitude at 400 m. The flying dynamics of plum moth was followed (Grafolita funebrana Tr). The monitoring was conducted in nontreated plum plantations with various cultivars. The anomalies and climate characteristics for the period of study and the phenology of flying of plum canker worm were reported. It was found that the influence over flying of plum canker worm, during the years with small rainfall amount, was characterized by a lack of sharply outlined peaks – which reflected the number of captured butterflies and the sharp boundaries among generations. It was reported that the beginning of flying of plum moth occurred during April at effective temperature sum of 30 °С during years with characteristic droughts and a presence of very small flying during years characterized by greater than normal amounts of rainfalls. It was found that after prolonged rainfalls, during the time of appearance and flying of moth of the second generation, the activity of butterflies was influenced and decreased strongly also by the presence of great cloudiness of 9-11 wind force.

References

Атанасов, А., Гушев, В., Драгойски, К., Георгиев, Д., Стефанова, Б., Минков, П., Вълева, С. 2013. Фенологичен модел на сливовия плодов червей (Laspeyresia funebrana Tr.). Jоurnal of Montain Agricultural on the Balkans, Vol. 16, 5, 1276-1285.

Атанасов, А., Динкова, Х., Драгойски, К., Манева, С., Георгиев, Д., Величков, А., Кирилова, Г. 2012. Нова растителнозащитна система за биологично производство при къснозреещ сорт сливи. Jоurnal of Montain Agricultural on the Balkans, Vol. 15, 5, 1136-1150.

Димитрова, Д. 1997. Влияе ли облачността върху активността на пеперудите. Растителна защита, № 10.

Михайлова, Ф., Страка, Ф., Апостолов, И. 1982. Растителнозащитна прогноза и сигнализация. Земиздат, С., с. 342.

Недев, Н. и др. 1979. Методика за изучаване на растителните ресурси при овощните растения. Пловдив.

Попски, Г., Драгойски, К., Стефанова, Б., Динкова, Хр. 2013. Почвено-климатичните и теренни условия в планинските региони - фактори за плодопроизводството. Journal of Mountain Agriculture on the Balkan, v. 16, № 1, 34-49.

Atanasov, A., Dinkova, H., Dragoiski, K., Geor giev, D., Velichkov, A., Kirilova, G. 2012. Studi of the influence of a new plant protection system for biological production of fruits on enpression of plum rust (Tranzschelia pruni spinosae (Pers) Diet). Journal of Pomology, 46,179-180, 135-140.

Kutinkova, H., Dzhuvinov, V., Samietz, J., Vero nelli, V., Iodice, A., Bassanetti, C. 2011. Control of plum fruit moth, Grafolita funebrana, by Isomate OFM rosso dispensers, in plum orchards of Bulgaria. IOBC/ wprs Bulletin, 72: 53-57.

Puskas, J., Nowinszky, L., Barezikay, G., Kuti, Zs. 2007. The pheromone traps catch of harmful moth in connection with solar actiwity featured by Q-index. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 8 (3), 261-266

Published

29.06.2015

How to Cite

Monitoring of flying of plum moth (Grafolita funebrana Tr.) in the region of Troyan under different climate conditions. (2015). Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science, 52(3), 36-42. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjcs/article/view/3381