Characterization of the Obtained Yields from Bulgarian Common Bean Genotypes, Grown in Irrigated and Non-irrigated Conditions
Keywords:
common bean; drought tolerance; irrigation; Phaseolus vulgaris; yielAbstract
Studies were carried out three years (2011 – 2013) to establish the effect of irrigation on the yield of formation in the common beans. The studies were carried out in 10 stable mutant lines (M20-generation) and 10 cultivars of common beans. Very well expressed positive effect of irrigation was found for the tested mutant lines № 5/D2-0.0062 M EMS and № 6/D2-0.0125 M EMS. Mutant line № 10/D2-0.0031 М NEU poorly responds to irrigation and average increasing in yield, as a result of it, is 15.4%. Most substantial relative increase in yields, after irrigation of the tested common bean cultivars, settled in the cultivars Plovdiv 2, Plovdiv 10 and Plovdiv 564. Very weak effect of irrigation was reported in cultivar Plovdiv 15 M, in which the yield increased only by 6 – 9%. Interest to the breeding programmes represent mutant lines № 5/D2-0.0062 M EMS, № 6/D2-0.0125 M EMS and cultivars – Plovdiv 2, Plovdiv 10 and Plovdiv 564 they show high productivity without irrigation, but by irrigation conditions the yield may increase to 20 – 90%.
References
Atanasov, I. 1972. Manual for practical exercises in soil science. "Hr. G. Danov", Plovdiv.
De Pascale, S., M. I. Sifola. 1995. Gas exchanges – yield and yield quality of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as affected by irrigation regime and harvest form in greenhouse. Campania, v. 24 (6), p. 71-75
El-Noemani, A., H. El-Zeiny, A. El-Gindy, E. El-Sahhar, M. El-Shawadfy. 2010. Performance of some bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties under different irrigation systems and regimes. Australian Journal оf Basic and Applied Sciences, 4(12): 6185-6196
El-Shamma H, A. Shahien, S. Awad. 2000. Studies on the influence of varying soil moisture regimes, phosphorus and potassium fertilization rates on common bean plants: B – green pods and dry seed yield and quality. Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor, 38(4): 2473-2492
Erdem, Y., S. Sehirali, T. Erdem, D. Kenar. 2006. Determination of crop water stress index for irrigation scheduling of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 30, (3), 195-202
Georgiev, G. V., K. Darzhanov, Sl. Dulov, N. Uzunov, A. Ovcharova. 1991. Manual for exercises on land reclamation. "Zemya", Sofia.
Giralt, E. 1979. Regimen de riego del cultivo del frijol negru (P. vulgaris L.). Cienc. Tecn. en Agr. Riego Dren., 2, 1:2-23
Isk, M., Z. Önceler, S. Cakr, F. Altay. 2004. Effects of different irrigation regimes on the yield and yield components of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 52(4): 381-389
Jadoski, S., R. Carlesso, G. Melo, M. Rodrigues, Z. Frizzo. 2003. Irrigation water management to maximum bean grain yield. Irriga, 8(1): 1-9
Jara, R. 1990. Drought response of five bean varieties (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Preliminary study Agro-Ciencia (Chile), v. 6(2), p. 95-101
Jara, R. J., Izquierdo, F. J., Matta, C. R. 1988. Physiomorphological and yield response of black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to water deficit. Agro-Ciencia; 4(1): 21-26
Krafty, G., G. Georgiev. 1969. Manual for exercises on land reclamation. Zemizdat, Sofia.
Köksal, E., Kara, T., Apan, M., Üstün, H., İlbeyi, A. 2008. Estimation of green bean yield, water deficiency and productivity using spectral indexes during the growing season. Irrigation & Drainage Systems, 22, (3/4), 209-223
Lobo, F. de A., Oliva, M. A., Resende, M., Lopes, N. F., Maestri, M. 2004. Infrared thermometry to schedule irrigation of common bean Embrapa Informação Tecnológica Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, vol. 39, № 2.
Mehta, O. P., K. P. Singh, R. S. Malik, J. Singh. 1987. Response of summer black gram (Vigna Mungo Happer) to irrigation and phosphorus levels. Agr. Sc. Dig., 7, 2: 91-93
Sadek, I., U. El-Behairy, M. El-Shinawy, I. El-Oksh. 2002. Response of snap bean plants to irrigation regimes. Egyptian Journal of Horticulture, 29(3/4): 473-485
Sezen, S., A. Yazar, A. Akyildiz, H. Dasgan, B. Gencel. 2008. Yield and quality response of drip irrigated green beans under full and deficit irrigation. Scientia Horticulturae, 117, (2), 95-102
Sezen, S., A. Yazar, M .Canbolat, S. Eker, G. Celikel. 2005. Effect of drip irrigation management on yield and quality of field grown green beans. Agricultural Water Management, 71, (3), 243-255
Silveira, P. M., S. Steinmetz, C. Guimaraes, H. Aidar, J. Carvalho. 1984. Laminas de agua e turnos de rega na cultura do feijoeirode inverno. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasiliera, 19, (2), 193-223
Singh, S., S. Prasad, K. Sinha. 2001. Response of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to irrigation and weed management in Calciothrents of north Bihar. Indian Journal
of Agronomy [serial online], 46(2): 282-286
Stone, L. F., J. A. A. Moreira, S. C. Da Silva. 1988. Efientos da tensao da agua do solo sobre a produtividate e crescimento do feijoeiro. 1. Produtividate. Pesquisa Agropec. Brasil., 23, 2: 161-167
Stoyanov, Z., G. Georgiev, R. Rafailov, K. Darzhanov, Sl. Dulov. 1981. Manual for exercises on agricultural land reclamation. Zemizdat, Sofia.
Vitkov, M. 1974. Influence of irrigation and fertilization on the yield of beans on podzolic chernozem in the area of the Scientific Research Institute "Obraztsov Chiflik". Plant Sciences, No. 10, 101-106
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
