Phytosanitary condition and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum) after application of different types of organic compost in organic and biodynamic farming systems

Authors

  • Vasilina Maneva Institute of Agriculture-Karnobat, 8400 Karnobat, Agricultural Academy -Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Dina Atanasova Institute of Agriculture-Karnobat, 8400 Karnobat, Agricultural Academy -Sofia, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

wheat; einkorn; organic farming; biodynamic farming; organic compost

Abstract

The experiment was conducted in the period 2013-2016 on the experimental fields of the Institute of Agriculture in Karnobat, Bulgaria. Wheat and einkorn wheat were grown in biodynamic and organic farming systems after application of different types of organic compost. Studies were conducted on the effect of compost types on phytosanitary condition and yield of the crops. The experiments established that the phytosanitary condition of wheat was better when it was biodynamically cultivated with applied standard biodynamic compost in the soil. No diseases and pests were reported for einkorn wheat in the three variants, whereas weeds had lower density and species composition in einkorn than in wheat and the variant with standard biodynamic compost was the most weakly infested. The highest yields of wheat and einkorn wheat were obtained at biodynamic cultivation with applied standard biodynamic compost, followed by the variant of biodynamic compost according to Maria Thun’s compost preparations.

References

Blackman, R. l., & Eastop, V. F. (2000). Aphids on the world’s crops: an identification and information guide (2nd edition). New York, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Bozhanova, V. & Dechev, D. (2009). Problems and per spectives related to the cultivation of cereal species in a biological way. In: Economics and Development of the Knowledge-based Society, International Scientific Con ference, June 4-5th 2009, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria (Bg).

Carpenter-Boggs, l., Kennedy, A. C., & Reganold, J. P. (2000). Organic and biodynamic management effects on soil biology. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64(5), 1651-1659.

Delipavlov, D., cheshmedzhiev, i., Popova, M., Terziyski, D. & Kovachev, i. (2003). Determination of plants in Bulgaria. Plovdiv, Agrarian University (Bg).

Dewar, A. M., Dean, G. J., & Cannon, R. (1982). Assess ment of methods for estimating the numbers of aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in cereals. Bulletin of Entomo logical Research, 72(4), 675-685.

Diver, S. (1999). Biodynamic Farming & Compost Prepa ration. ATTRA.

Hagel, i. (1988). Diebiologisch-dynamischen Kompostprä parate 502-506 in Verbindung mit einem Triebkraft-und Selbstzersetzungstest. Lebendige Erde, 1/88, 16-23. http://www.demeter.net

Krivchenko, V. (1984). Stability of grain grains to patho gens of headaches. Moscow, Kolos (Ru).

Reganold, J. P. (1995). Soil quality and profitability of bio dynamic and conventional farming systems: A review. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 10(1), 36-45.

Steiner, R. (1924). Agriculture: A course of eight lectures (3rd edition). George Adams, London: Biodynamic As sociation 1974.

Stepanov, K. & Chumakov, A. (1972). Forecast of Dis eases in Agricultural Plants. Leningrad, Kolos (Ru).

Van Emden, H. F. (1972). Aphid technology. Academic Press London, 107-110.

Downloads

Published

29.06.2018

How to Cite

Phytosanitary condition and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum) after application of different types of organic compost in organic and biodynamic farming systems. (2018). Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science, 55(3), 10-15. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjcs/article/view/2972