Evaluation of the rates of change of productivity of some main varieties, selected in DAI G. Toshevo for the period 2007 – 2017 years

Authors

  • Emil Penchev Dobrudzha Agricultural Institute – General Toshevo, 9521, General Toshevo, Agricultural academy - Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • Rumyana Alexandrova Dobrudzha Agricultural Institute – General Toshevo, 9521, General Toshevo, Agricultural academy - Sofia, Bulgaria Author

Keywords:

ecological plasticity and stability; productivity; winter soft wheat

Abstract

The productivity of 16 new varieties of winter soft wheat was analyzed selected at the Dobrudzha Agricultural Institute and implemented in practice for an 11-year period. The rate of productivity of each variety for this period by years is estimated. The average rate is calculated as a geometric mean. The applied analysis of productivity and the obtained average estimates of the rates for the period prove that the studied varieties show growth in the indicator “yield” and show resistance to changes in climatic conditions. The Todora, Christie, Enola and Aglika varieties increased their productivity by an average of 2% over the period. The varieties Laska, Korona, Demetra and Antonovka are characterized by the lowest coefficients. Тhe varieties Milena, Iveta, Neda, Aglika, Antonovka, Karina and Karat are characterized by their higher resistance to climate change, the varieties Korona, Kristi, Galatea and Demetra reacted more significantly.

References

Freedman, D. A. (2005). Statistical Models: Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0-521-67105-7, 2005.

Johnson, D. E., & Milliken, G. A. (1989). Analysis of Messy Data, Volume II: Nonreplicated Experiments. Chapman and Hall.

Lee, E. J. (2004). Statistical analysis software for multiplicative interaction models. Kansas State University.

Mayer, J., Gunst, L., Mäder, P., Samson, M. F., Carcea, M., Narducci, V., ... & Dubois, D. (2015). Productivity, quality and sustainability of winter wheat under long-term conventional and organic management in Switzerland. European Journal of Agronomy, 65, 27-39.

Pabale, S. S., & Pandya, H. R. (2010). A comparison of different stability models for genotype x environment interaction in pearl millet. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 1(5), 1294-1298.

Penchev E., Atanasova, M., & Stoeva, I. (2005). Еvaluation the ecological plasticity and stability of quality indices and productivity of winter wheat varieties by models of Shukla, Eberhart & Russel . International Scientific Conference, Agrar University Plovdiv, pp. 61-65.

Tsenov, N., Kostov, K., Todorov, I., Panayotov, I., Stoeva, I., Atanasova, D., Mankovski, I., & Chamurliyski, P. (2009). Problems, achievements and perspectives in the productivity selection of winter wheat. Field Crops Studies, V-2, 261-273 (Bg).

Published

13.08.2020

How to Cite

Evaluation of the rates of change of productivity of some main varieties, selected in DAI G. Toshevo for the period 2007 – 2017 years. (2020). Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science, 57(4), 3-8. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjcs/article/view/2418