Phenotypic stability for economic traits of Bulgarian and foreign cotton varieties
Keywords:
cotton; economic traits; G. hirsutum L.; genotype environment interaction; stability; varietiesAbstract
The interaction genotype × environment and stability for most important economic traits of 31 Bulgarian and foreign cotton varieties were studied in 2016 – 2019. The years of research were used as different ecological environments. To evaluate the stability, different stability methods were used: the stability variances (σ2i, S2i) of Shukla (1972), the ecovalence (W2 i) of Wricke (1962), the parameter YSi of Kang (1993) and the regression parameters (bi, S2di) of Eberhart & Russel (1966) (for the seed cotton yield only). There was significant genotype × year interaction for all traits under study. Stability was found for all traits, some genotypes showed stability for two traits. According to the regression parameters (bi and S2 di), regarding seed cotton yield, the varieties Helius, Trakia, possessing high productivity, Dorina and Chirpan-539 (standard variety) showed a relatively stable performance in different year conditions. The Helius variety, combining high yield and stability according to the regression and variance parameters, outlined as the most valuable for the cotton production. Viki and Denitsa varieties, high yielding, showed specific adaptation to favorable environments and they also were very valuable for implementation in the production. The Greek variety 791-169 combined high average level for the boll weight (5.5 g) and high stability. The Viki, Avangard-264, Eva and Vega varieties (boll weight 5.4-5.5 g) also showed stable performance on all stability parameters. The Viki variety emerged as the most valuable in terms of ginning out turn, combining high mean value (36.1%) and stability. The Boyana and Nelina varieties showed also stable performance (ginning out turn 35.3-35.7%). The varieties Natalia, Dorina, Perla-267 and Colorit in fiber length were compared with the foreign ones and had stable performance by all stability methods. Given the estimates of the parameter YSi and the overall performance according to the variances σ2i, S2i and ecovalence Wi 2, the varieties Eva, Natalia, Millennium, Perla-267 and Colorit combined best 1st fruiting branch height and stability, which makes them very valuable for the cotton breeding programs.
References
Alexandrov, V., Simeonov, P., Kazandzhiev, V., Korchev, G. & Yotova, A. (2010). Climate change. NIMH - BAS.
Balakrishna, B., Chenga Reddy, V. & Lal Ahamed, M. (2016). Stability analysis for seed cotton yield & its component traits in inter-specific hybrids of cotton (G. hirsutum × G. barbadense). Green Farming 7 (5): 1013-1018. Chahal, G.S., Prakash, R.S., Sohu
Becker, H. C., & Leon, J. (1988). Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant breeding, 101(1), 1-23.
Campbell, B., Chee, P., Lubbers, E., Bowman, D., Meredith, W., Johnson, J., Fraser, D., Bridges, W. & Jones, D. (2012). Dissecting genotype - environment interactions and trait correlations present in the Pee Dee cotton germplasm collection following seventy years of plant breeding. Crop Science, 52, 690–699.
Chinchane, V.N., Deosarkar, D.B. & Kalpande H.V. (2018). Stability Analysis for Seed Cotton Yield and its Component Traits in Hybrids of Desi Cotton (Gossypium arboreum L.). Int. J .Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci 7(9), 1000-1012.
De Carvalho, L.P., Salgado, C.C., Farias, F.J.C. & Carneiro, V.Q. (2015). Stability and adaptability of cotton genotypes of colorful fibers in relation to the fiber characters. Ciencia Rural, 45(4), 598-606. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103- 8478cr2013023
Deho, Z.A., Abro, S. & Rizwan, M. (2021). Assessment of stability for seed cotton yield of cotton genotypes across different environmental conditions of Sindh Province. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 34 (1), 108-112.
Dewdar, M.D.H. (2013). Stability analysis and genotype x environment interactions of some Egyptian cotton cultivars cultivated. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8, 5156-5160.
Dimitrova, V. & Stoilova, A. (2005). Yield stability of cotton samples for fiber length and lint percentage. Selection and agrotechnics of field crops. First part. Balkan Scientific Conference Dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of the Establishment of the Institute of Agriculture in Karnobat, June 2, Karnobat, pp. 311-314.
Dimitrova, V., Stoilova, A. & Genov, G. (2004). Evaluation of cotton samples by cluster analysis. Scientific Conference with International Participation, June 3-4, Stara Zagora. Agricultural Science - Plant Breeding, Volume I, Part I. Genetics and selection, weeds, diseases and pests. Ed. "Union of Scientists" St. Zagora, pp. 86-90.
Eberhart, S.A. & Russell, W.A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6, pp. 36-40. https://doi.org/10.2135/
Farias, F.J.C., De Carvalho, L.P., Da Silva Filho, J.L. & Teodoro, P.E. (2016). Biplot analysis of phenotypic stability in upland cotton genotypes in Mato Grosso. Genetics and Molecular Research, 15(2): gmr.15028009 https://doi.org/10.4238/
Fathi Sadabadi, M., Ranjbar, G. A., Zangi, M. R., Kazemi Tabar, S. K. & Najafi Zarini, H. (2018). Analysis of stability and adaptation of cotton genotypes using GGE biplot method. Trakia Journal of Sciences, No 1, pp. 51-61. ISSN 1313-7050 (print) ISSN 1313-3551 (online)
Finlay, K. W. & Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding program. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14, pp. 742-754.
Gauch, H. G. Jr. & Zobel, R. W. (1988). Predictive and postdictive success of statistical analyses of yield trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76, pp. 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00288824
Güvercİn, R.Ș., Karademİr, E., Karademİr, Ç., Özkan, N., Ekİncİ, R. & Borzan, G. (2017). Adaptability and stability analysis of some cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars in East Mediterranean and GAP region (South-Eastern Anatolia Project) conditions. Journal article : Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi / Harran Journal of Agricultural and Food Science – 2017, Vol.21, No.1, pp. 41-52 ref.23.
Iqbal, M.Z., Nazir, S., Rahman, S.U. & Younas, M. (2018). Stability analysis of candidate bollgard bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes for yield traits. Int. J. Biosci. Agric. Biotechnol. Res. Inst., Ayub Agric. Res. Inst. (AARI), Faisalabad Pak., 13(5), pp. 55-63. https://doi.org/10.12692/
Kang, M.S. (1993). Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agron. J. 85, pp. 754-757.
Kang, M.S. & Magari, R. (1995). Stable a BASICA program for calculating stability and yield- stability statistics. Agron. J. 87, pp. 276-277.
Khalifa, H. S., Baker, K. M. A., Mahrous, H. (2010). Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in some Egyptian cotton genotypes. Egypt Journal of Plant Breeding 14(2), 33-41.
Lin, C. S., Binns, M. R., & Lefkovitch, L. P. (1986). Stability analysis: where do we stand? 1. Crop science, 26(5), 894-900.
Mahtabi, E., Farshadfar, E. & Jowkar, M.M. (2014). Stability analysis of yield and yield components in cotton genotypes. Agricultural Communication, 2, 1–8.
Maleia, M.P., Jamal, E.C., Savanguane, J.W., João, J. & Teca, J.O. (2019) Stability and Adaptability of Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) Genotypes under Multi Environmental Conditions in Mozambique. Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Science, 2, 017.
Meredith, W.Jr., Boykin, D.L., Bourland, F.M., Caldwell, W.D., Campbell, B.T., Gannaway, J., Glass, K., Jones, A.P., May, L.M. & Smith, C. (2012). Genotype - environment interactions over seven years for yield, yield components, fiber quality, and gossypol traits in the regional high quality tests. J. Cotton Sci. 16,160–169.
Moiana, L.D.M., Vidigal-Filho, P.S., Gonçalves-Vidigal, M.S., Lacanallo, G.F., Galván, Z., Carvalho, L.P., Maleia M.P. & Mindo, N. (2014). Application of mixed models for the assessment genotype and environment interations in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. race latifolium H.) in Mozambique. Afr. J. Bio-Technol., 13: 1985- 1991. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2013.12926
Orawu, M., Amoding, G., Serunjogi, L., Ogwang, G. &Ogwang, C. (2017). Yield stability of cotton genotypes at three diverse agro-ecologies of Uganda. Journal of plant breeding and genetics, 5(3), 101-114.
Patil, A.E., Deosarkar, D.B. & Kalyankar, S.V. (2017). Impact of genotype x environment interaction on the heterosis and stability for seed cotton yield on heterozygous and homozygous genotypes in cotton. Indian J. Genet.77 (1): 119-125.
Pinki, S.S. Siwach, Sangwan, R.S., Sombir Singh, Mor, V.S., Shiwani Mandhania, Sunayana and Neha Rohila (2018). Stability Analysis for Seed Cotton Yield and Its Components in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 7(4), 1630-1638.
doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.704.184
Pretorius, M. M., Allemann, J., & Smith, M. F. (2015). Use of the AMMI model to analyse cultivar-environment interaction in cotton under irrigation in South Africa. African Journal of Agriculture, 2(2), i+-76.
Riaz, M., Jehanzeb Farooq, Saghir Ahmed, Muhammad Amin, Waqas Shafqat Chattha, Maria Ayoub1 & Riaz Ahmed Kainth (2019). Stability analysis of different cotton genotypes under normal and water-deficit conditions. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 18(6), 1257–1265
Riaz, M., Naveed, M., Farooq, J., Farooq, A., Mahmood, A., Rafiq, C.M., Nadeem, M. & Sadiq, A. (2013). AMMI analysis for stability, adaptability and GE interaction studies in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal of Animal Plant Science, 23 (3): 865-871.
Shahzad, K., Tingxiang Qi, Liping Guo, Huini Tang, Xuexian Zhang, Hailin Wang, Xiuqin Qiao, Meng Zhang, Bingbing Zhang, Juanjuan Feng, Muhammad Shahid Iqbal,J ianyong Wu & Chaozhu Xing (2019). Adaptability and Stability Comparisons of Inbred and Hybrid Cotton in Yield and Fiber Quality Traits. Agronomy, 9, 516.
Shashibhushan, D. & Patel, U.G. (2020). Stability analysis for seed cotton yield and its components of conventional, GMS and CMS based hybrids in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9 (4): 3283-3293.
Shukla, G. K. (1972). Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype - environmental components of variability. Heredity, 29, 237-245.
Stoilova, A. (2001). Phenotypic stability of seven cotton genotypes. Scientific works, Agricultural University - Plovdiv, vol. XLVI, book 3, 157-162.
Stoilova, A. (2004). Breeding value of new cotton lines. Plant Science, 41, 273-277.
Stoilova, A. (2010). Phenotypic stability of new cotton varieties with improved fibre quality. Agricultural Science and Technology. An International Journal Published by Faculty of Agriculture, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria, Vol., 2, No. 1, 6-8.
Stoilova, A., & Dechev, D. (2001-2002). Genotype-environment interaction and phenotypic stability of yield in cotton lines. Genetics and Breeding, Vol. 31, No. 1-2, 45-47.
Stoilova, A., Dechev, D. (2002). Genotype-environment interaction and phenotypic stability of economic traits in cotton lines. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 8, 485-491
Stoilova, A. & Genov, G. (2000). Yield stability of cotton lines with introduced genplasma of the species Gossypium barbadense L. Plant Science, No. 9, pp. 697-700.
Tuteja, O. P., Singh, D. P. & Chhabra, B. S. (1999). Genotype x Environment interaction on yield and quality traits of Asiatic cotton (G. arboreum L.). Indian J agric. Sci., 69(3), 220-223.
Valchinkov, S. (2000). Study of the genotype-environment interaction in self-pollinated lines and hybrids of maize / Zea mays L. /. Dissertation, Knezha, Bulgaria
Vakova, N. & Dechev, D. (2005). Phenotype stability of mutant cotton lines for some quality traits of fibre. Field Crop Studies, Vol. II -1, 57-62.
Vavdiya, P.A., Chovatia, V.P., Bhut, N.M. & Vadodariya, G.D. (2021) G x E interactions and stability analysis for seed cotton yield and its components in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, Vol 12, No 2: EJPB
Westcott, B. (1986). Some methods of analysing genotype - environment interaction. Heredity, 56, pp. 243-253.
Wricke, G. (1962). Über eine Methode zur Erfassung der Okasiagischen Streubreite in Feld Versuchen. Pflanzuecht, 47, pp. 92-96.
Xu, N., Fok, M., Zhang, G., Li, J. & Zhou, Z. (2014). The application of GGE Bi-plot analysis for evaluating test locations and mega-environment investigation of cotton regional trials. J. Integr. Agric. Adv. Vol. 13, Is. 9, 1921-1933.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60656-5.
Yan, W., Hunt, L.A., Sheng, Q.L. & Szlavnics, Z. (2000). Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE bi-plot. Crop Sci. 40:596-605.
Zeng, L., Meredith, J., Campbell, B.T., Dever, J.K., Zhang, J., Glass, K.M., Jones, A.S., Myers, G.O. & Bourland, F.M. (2014). Genotype-by-environment interaction effects on lint yield of cotton cultivars across major regions in the US cotton Belt. J. Cotton Sci. 18, 75–84.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
