EFFICIENCY OF REPRODUCTION OF FIXED ASSETS IN POLISH AGRICULTURE

Authors

  • J. ZWOLAK University of Economics and Innovation (WSEI) in Lublin, 20-209 Lublin, Poland Author
  • M. KULYNYCH The Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University in Lutsk, 43025, Lutsk, Ukraine Author

Keywords:

reproduction (restoration) of fixed assets, average and marginal productivity, average rate of growth, functional dependence

Abstract

The article includes research on the efficiency of the increase in gross value of newly introduced fixed assets and the net value of held fixed assets in Polish agriculture in the years 2010, 2011 and 2012. The efficiency (average and marginal productivity) of the increase in gross value of newly introduced fixed assets (restoration) was in the area of rational management. Whereas the efficiency of the net value of held fixed assets (basis) was at the beginning of entry into the area of rational management of this resource. The average rate of growth of the increase in gross value of newly introduced fixed assets was eleven times faster than the average rate of growth of sold market output. The changes that occurred during the aforementioned restoration of fixed assets also changed the organization and the existing conditions of market output. Whereas the average rate of growth of the net value of held fixed assets was similar to the average rate of growth of sold market output. The aforementioned is in accordance with the theory of the application of fixed assets, which states that the increase in fixed assets should be connected with the increase in sold market output.

References

Aczel, A. D. and J. Sounderpandian, 2002. Complete Business Statistics. McGraw – Hill/Irwin; ISBN 978-83-01-15338-0.

Bojnec, S. et. al., 2014. Determinants of technical efficiency in agriculture in new EU member states from Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Oeconomica, 64 (2): 197–217.

Bomfim, A. N., 2003. Optimal portfolio allocation in a world without Treasury securities. Journal Asset Management, 4 (1): 10–21.

Brem, M., 2002. Organisational Change in Agricultural Transition. Acta Oeconomica, 52 (1).

Carlaw, K. J. and R. G. Lipsey, 2003. Productivity, technology and economic growth: what is the relationship? Mergeformatinet. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17 (3): 457–495.

Carter, M. R. and P. Olinto, 2003. Getting institutions constrains and the impact of property rights on the quantity and composition of investment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85 (1): 173–186.

Estes, R., 1993. Toward sustainable development: from theory to praxis. Social Development Issues, 15 (3): 1–29.

Le, K. N. et. al., 2004. Investment, uncertainty and irreversibility. Economics Transition, 12 (2): 307–332.

Lissits, A. and A. Balmany, 2003. Efficiency and Productivity of Farms in Post – Unification Germany, EFITA (2003): Conference, Debrecen, Hungary, pp. 439–449.

Moosa, J. A., 1997. A cross – country comparison of Okun’s coefficient. Journal of Comparative Economics, 24: 335–356.

Rothbard, M. N., 2004. Man, Economy and State with Power and Market, Ludwig von Mises Institute; ISBN-83-89812-37-1.

Downloads

Published

29.04.2016

Issue

Section

Agricultural Economics and Management

How to Cite

ZWOLAK, J., & KULYNYCH, M. (2016). EFFICIENCY OF REPRODUCTION OF FIXED ASSETS IN POLISH AGRICULTURE. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 22(2), 182-187. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/4807