IN VITRO PROPAGATION OF WILD BULGARIAN SMALL BERRY FRUITS (BILBERRY, LINGONBERRY, RASPBERRY AND STRAWBERRY)
Keywords:
strawberry, raspberry, bilberry, lingonberry, in vitro methods, Folin-Ciocalteu, DPPH, FRAP, phenolic content, antioxidative propertiesAbstract
Recently, an increased interest in the identification of valuable possibilities for preserving the antioxidant properties of wild berry fruits rich in bioactive compounds can be noticed.
The interest in small berry cultivation is growing because of the high value of the fruit in global food markets. Tissue culture provides an efficient propagation method for the selected berry genotypes both for the breeding and cultivation purposes.
Four wild Bulgarian species - strawberry (Fragaria vesca L., Rosaceae), raspberry (Rubus idaeus L., Rosaceae), bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L., Ericaceae) and lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) were evaluated in terms of their regeneration capacity when propagated in vitro by auxiliary organogenesis.
The highest average number of shoots (12.6) was accounted in wild strawberry, followed by wild raspberry (6.8) on MS medium supplemented with IBA, BAP and GA. The multiplication indices for bilberry and lingonberry were respectively 7 and 4.6 shoots per explant, cultivated on WPM + vitamin C with addition of growth regulators 6-[4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enylamino] purine (zeatin) and N6-[2-isopenteny1] adenine (2iP). The rooting of wild strawberry was successful on MS medium supplemented with IBA, BAP and GA, while for raspberry the addition of only IBA. The rooting potential of bilberry and lingonberry varied between 1.4% to 33.3% (medium R10 and R12).
Folin-Cio+calteu, DPPH and FRAP spectrophotometric assays were used for the assessment of the total phenolic content and the antioxidative properties of methanolic fruit extracts obtained from ex vitro and in vivo species. The antioxidant capacity determined by FRAP method was presented the values between 18.73-35.22 mM TE/g DW and in the case of DPPH assay the obtained values were situated in the range 63.75-95.65 mM TE/g DW. TPC from analyzed samples was situated in the range 28.95-53.16 mg GAE/g DW.
References
Anderson, W. C., 1975. Propagation of rhododendrons by tissue culture. Development of a culture medium for multiplication of shoots. Comb Proc Int Plant Propag Soc., 25: 129-135.
Benzie, I. and J. Strain. 1996. The ferric reducing agent of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of antioxidant power. The FRAP Assay. Analytical Biochemistry, 239: 70-76.
Boxus, P. 1974. Production of strawberry plants by in vitro micropropagation. J. Hortic Sci. 49: 209-210.
Buricova, L., M. Andjelkovic, A. Cermakova, Z. Reblova, O.Jurcek, E. Kolehmainen, R. Verhe and F. Kvasnicka. 2011. Antioxidant capacities and antioxidants of strawberry, blackberry and raspberry leaves. Czech. J. Food Sci., 29: 181-189.
Côté, J., S. Caillet, G. Doyon, J.-F. Sylvain and M. Lacroix. 2010. Analyzing cranberry bioactive compounds. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 50: 872-88.
Debergh, P. C. and P. E. Read, 1991. Micropropagation. In: P. C. Debergh and R. H Zimmerman (Eds.). Micropropagation: Technology and Application. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 1-13.
Debnath, S. C., 2007. Strategies to propagate Vaccinium nuclear stocks for the Canadian berry industry. Can. J. Plant Sci., 87: 911-922.
Deighton, N., R. Brennan, C. Finn and H. Davies, 2000. Antioxidant properties of domesticated and wild Rubus species. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 80 (9): 1307-1313.
Dincheva, I., I. Badjakov, V. Kondakov and R. Batchvarova, 2013. Metabolic profiling of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus) during fruit development and ripening. Int. J. Agric. Sci. Res., 3: 81-88.
Escarpa, A. and M. C. Gonzalez, 2001. An Overview of Analytical Chemistry of Phenolic Compounds in Foods. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 31: 57-139.
Graham, J., 2005. Fragaria strawberry. In: R. Litz (Ed.) Biotechnology of Fruit and Nut Crops. Biotechnology in Agriculture Series, no. 29, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 456-474.
Häkkinen, S., M. Heinonen, S. Kärenlampi, H. Mykkänen, J. Ruuskanen and R. Törrönen. 1999. Screening of selected flavonoids and phenolic acids in 19 berries. Food Research International, 32: 345-53.
Harnly, J. M., R. F. Doherty, G. R. Beecher, J. M. Holden, D. B. Haytowitz, S. Bhagwat and S. Gebhardt, 2006. Flavonoid Content of U.S. Fruits, Vegetables and Nuts. J. Agr. Food Chem., 54: 9966-9977.
Hung, H.-C., K. J. Joshipura, R. Jiang, F. B. Hu, D. Hunter, S. A. Smith-Warner, G. A. Colditz, B. Rosner, D. Spiegelman and W. C. Willett, 2004. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of major chronic disease. J Natl Cancer Inst., 96: 1577-1584.
Magalhães, L. M., M. A. Segundo, S. Reis and J. L. F. C. Lima, 2008. Methodological aspects about in vitro evaluation of antioxidant properties. Anal. Chim. Acta, 61 (3): 1-19.
McCown, B. H. and G. Lloyd. 1981. Woody plant medium (WPM) a mineral nutrient formulation for microculture of woody plant species. Hort. Science, 16: 453.
Murashige, T. and I. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiol., 15: 473-474.
Poiană, M., M. Bragea, D. Moigrădean, D. Stoin and I. Gergen, 2008. Evaluation of antioxidant properties and color structure for some natural concentrates from berries and garden fruits. Bulletin UASVM, Agriculture, 65 (2): 351-356.
Prior, R. L, G. Cao, A. Martin, E. Sofic, J. McEwen, C. O’Brien, N. Lischner, M. Ehlenfeldt, W. Kalt, G. Krewer and C. M. Mainland, 1998. Antioxidant Capacity As Influenced by Total Phenolic and Anthocyanin Content, Maturity, and Variety of Vaccinium Species. J. Agric. Food Chem., 46: 2686-2693.
Puupponen-Pimiä, R., A. M. Aura, K. M. Oksman-Caldentey, P. Myllärinen, M. Saarela, T. Mattila-Sandholm and K. Poutanen. 2002. Development of functional ingredients for gut health. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 13: 3-11.
Puupponen-Pimiä, R., L. Nohynek, S. Hartmann-Schmidlin, M. Kähkönen, M. Heinonen, K. Määttä-Riihinen and K.-M. Oksman-Caldentey, 2005. Berry phenolics selectively inhibit the growth of intestinal pathogens. J Appl. Microbiol., 98: 991-1000.
Skirvin, R. M., S. Motoike, M. Coyner and M. A. Norton, 2005. Rubus spp. cane fruit. In: R. Litz (Ed.) Biotechnology of Fruit and Nut Crops. Biotechnology in Agriculture Series, no. 29, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 566-582.
Turk, B., H. Swartz and R. Zimmerman. 1994. Adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro-cultured leaves of Rubus genotypes. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult., 38: 11-17.
Vazquez-Cruz, M. A., Guevara-Gonzalez and R. Miranda-Lopez, 2012. Effect of maturity stage and storage on flavor compounds and sensory description of berrycactus (Myrtillocactus geometrizans). J. Food Sci., 77 (4): C366-73.
Waterhouse, A., 2002. Determination of total phenolics. In: Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, New York, units I.1.1.1-I1.1.8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

