Consumers concern on food safety for domestic fresh tomato and its socio-economic factors in Albania-a multinomial regression approach

Authors

  • Myslym Osmani Agricultural University of Tirana, Department of Economics and Rural Development Policies, Tirana 1000, Albania Author
  • Mira Andoni Business University College, Department of Economics, Tirana, Albania, Tirana 1000, Albania Author
  • Arben Kambo Agricultural University of Tirana, Department of Economics and Rural Development Policies, Tirana 1000, Albania Author

Keywords:

consumers concern, food safety, multinomial model, perceived benefit, perceived risk, tomato

Abstract

The goal of this research is to assess the level and factors of the consumers’ concern on food safety risks of locally produced tomato in Albania. Data are collected through a survey of 824 randomly selected individuals in the metropolitan area of the Tirana city. Descriptive statistics are used but the key analytical tool is the multinomial logistic regression. Results show that the general level of concern is pretty high, 4.7, perceived benefit from the consumption of tomato is 3.6 and the perceived risk is 6.71 on a measurement scale from 0 to 10. Perceived benefit and risk are found to be major factors that determine the consumers’ concern level. Other factors affecting consumers’ concern are the household’s income and size, as well as the religious affiliation of the consumers. Other factors, such as gender, educational level and age of the consumer do not have significant effects on the concern level, though females, more educated and younger people tend to have higher levels of the variable as compared to other categories of people. Education and information of consumers, as well as improved public risk management, are some recommendations to improve consumers’ perceived concern and confidence in tomato food safety.

References

Albanian Law on Food (2008). Albanian Law on Food, Nr.9863, 28.1.2008. http://aku.gov.al/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Ligji-Nr-9863-dat%C3%AB-28.-1.-08-i-ndryshuarme-26.03.20013.pdf

Alhakami, A. S. & Slovic, P. (1994). A psychological study of the inverse relationship between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit.Risk Analysis, 14 (6). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x

Arrow, J. K. (1981). Risk perception in psychology and economic fluctuations, Technical Report No. 351, a Report of the Center for Research on organizational efficiency, Stanford University. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a111671.pdf

Arrow, K. J. (1963). Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. The American Economic Review, LIII (5), 941- 973.https://web.stanford.edu/~jay/health_class/Readings/Lecture01/arrow.pdf

Baillon, A, Bleichrodt, H., Emirmahmutoglu, A. & Jaspersen, J. G. (2018). When risk perception gets in the way: Probability weighting and under-prevention. SSRN Electronic Journal, January 2018. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3199867https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326470871_When_Risk_Perception_Gets_in_the_Way_Probability_Weighting_and_Underprevention

Baker, G. A. (2003). Food safety and fear: Factors affecting consumer response to food safety risk. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 6 (1). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/965d/3fc788c77ac7b58636c193f12df21113585e.pdf

Benoit, K. (2012). Multinomial and Ordinal Logistic Regression. https://kenbenoit.net/assets/courses/ME104/ME104_Day8_CatOrd.pdf

Dosman, D. M., Adamowicz, W. L. & Hrudey, S. E. (2001). Socioeconomic determinants of health- and food safety-related risk perceptions. Risk Analysis, 21 (2), 307-317.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11414539.

FAO-WHO (2003). Assuring Food Safety and Quality: Guidelines for Strengthening National Food Control Systems, FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 76. http://www.fao.org/3/a-y8705e.pdf

Finucane, M. L. & Holup, J. L. (2005). Psychological and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: an overview of the literature. Social Science and Medicine, 1603-1612.http://www.ask-force.org/web/Ethics/Finucane-Psychsocial-Cultural-Factors-2005.pdf

Frewer, L., De Jonge, J. & Van Kleef, E. (2009). Consumer perceptions on food safety. In: Medical Sciences, 2 , 244-264, EOLSS Publishers/UNESCO.

Grunert, K. G. (2005). Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32 (3), 369–391 doi:10.1093/eurrag/jbi011

INSTAT (2019). http://databaza.instat.gov.al/pxweb/sq/DST/START__BU/

Kafka, C. & Alvensleben, R. V. (1994). Consumer perceptions of food-related hazards and the problem of risk communication. https://www.uni-kiel.de/agrarmarketing/publikum/ahus3.pdf.

Kaptan, G., Fischer, A. R.H. & Frewer, L. J. (2017). Extrapolating understanding of food risk perceptions to emerging food safety cases. Journal of Risk Research, DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2017.1281330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1281330

Kardes, F. R., Cronley, M. L. &Cline, Th. W. (2011). Consumer behavior. South-Western, Cengage Learning.

Knight, A. & Warland, R. (2004).The Relationship between socio-demographics and concern about food safety issues. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 38 (1), 107-120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23860003

Mitchell, V. W. (1992). Understanding consumers’ behavior: Can perceived risk theory help? Management Decision, 30 (3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251749210013050

Mitchell, V. W. (1999). Consumer perceived risk: Conceptualizations and models. European Journal of Marketing, 33 (1/2), 163–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090569910249229

Nicole, J., Widmar, O., Melissa McKendre, G. S., & Croney, C. C. (2013). Consumer preferences for and perceptions of livestock production process attributes: Animal Welfare and Food Safety Attributes. https://meatscience.org/docs/default-source/publications-resources/rmc/2013/rmc-2013-nicole-widmar.pdf?sfvrsn=e6b6bab3_2

Schroeder, T., Tonsor, G., Pennings, J. M. E. &Mintert, J. (2007). Consumer risk perceptions and attitudes about beef food safety: Implications for improving supply chain management. Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 7 (1), 1848-1848. DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.1848. ·

Sjöberg, L., Bjørg-Elin, M.&Rundmo, T.B-E.(2004). Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research. Rotunde Publikasjoner, Rotunde no. 84. http://www.svt.ntnu.no/psy/Torbjorn.Rundmo/Psychometric_paradigm.pdf

Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285. http://www.heatherlench.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/slovic.pdf

Slovic, P. (1992). Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In: S. Krimsky & D. Golding (eds.), Social theories of risk (117-152). New York: Praeger. http://hdl.handle.net/1794/22510

Starr, C. (1969), Social benefit versus technological risk. Science, (165), 1232-1238. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/165/3899/1232

Taylor, J. W. (1974). The role of risk in consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 38(2), 54-60. DOI: 10.2307/1250198. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1250198

Tonsor, G. T., Schroeder, T. C. &Pennings, J. M. E. (2009). Factors impacting food safety risk perceptions. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60 (3), 625–644.doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00209.x

UN (2007). Improving the Safety and Quality of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: A Training Manual for Trainers. https://unctad.org/en/docs/ditccom200616_en.pdf

Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. 4th edition, South Western Cengage Learning.

Yu, H., Gibson, K. E., Wright, K. G., Neal, J. A. &Sirsat, S. A. (2017). Food safety and food quality perceptions of farmers’market consumers in the United States. Food Control, 79, 266-271. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.04.010. https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/5672384.

Downloads

Published

28.02.2021

Issue

Section

Agricultural Economics and Management

How to Cite

Osmani, M., Andoni, M., & Kambo, A. (2021). Consumers concern on food safety for domestic fresh tomato and its socio-economic factors in Albania-a multinomial regression approach. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 27(1), 3-11. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjas/article/view/2353