Possibilities for forecasting the exchange energy of feed and concentrate mixtures through the level of gas production

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61308/GHSS8713

Keywords:

metabolite energy, gas production, forages

Abstract

The study aims to establish the value of the exchangeable energy of grain, protein, and roughage feeds, as well as concentrate mixtures, through the level of their gas production. The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Base of the Agricultural Institute, Stara Zagora. During the experiment, three types of rations were tested: control, high-energy (based on corn grain), and high-protein (based on soybean meal). The Latin square method was applied, with the preparatory period of each animal when switching from one ration to another being 7 days, and the experimental period being 5 days. During the experiment, the tested rations were analyzed using the Gas Production System ANCOM RF /Ankom®, Tech. Co., Fairport, NY, USA, for which the rumen contents of the animals were taken in the morning (09:00).

In the study conducted using the gas production method at the 24th hour of incubation, the following values of exchange energy were obtained for the individual feed and concentrate mixtures:

When feeding the experimental animals with a control mixture, the exchange energy of alfalfa hay was established at a value of 9.19 MJ/kg CB at the 24th hour of incubation. When receiving a high-energy mixture, the OE level was 11.54 MJ/kg CB, and for the high-protein mixture, it was 11.12 MJ/kg CB. For wheat, the OE was established at 9.75 MJ/kg CB, for barley – 8.02 MJ/kg CB, and for corn – 8.85 MJ/kg CB, when feeding the experimental animals with a control mixture. The highest amount of OE is in wheat – 11.87 MJ/kg BW and barley – 12.09 MJ/kg BW when giving a high-energy mixture to the experimental animals. In corn, the value of metabolic energy is 9.81 MJ/kg BW. When feeding a high-protein mixture, a metabolic energy of 11.92 MJ/kg BW was established in barley. When receiving a control mixture from the experimental animals, a value of OE at the 24th hour was established for sunflower meal of 9.03 MJ/kg BW, and for soybean meal, 12.34 MJ/kg BW. In the high-energy mixture, the values are 10.18 MJ/kg BW and 16.65 MJ/kg BW for both types of meal. In the high-protein mixture, ME is 12.0 MJ/kg BW for sunflower meal and 14.22 MJ/kg BW for soybean meal. The exchangeable energy according to the gas released at the 24th hour of incubation is 8.85 MJ/kg BW for the control mixture, 9.01 MJ/kg BW for the high-energy mixture, and 9.41 MJ/kg BW for the high-protein mixture when feeding the rams with the control mixture. When feeding a high-energy mixture, these values are – 11.21 MJ/kg BW for the control, 10.49 MJ/kg BW for the high-energy, and 10.02 MJ/kg BW for the high-protein mixture. When feeding the animals with a high-protein mixture, 10.38 MJ/kg CB was obtained for the control mixture, 10.75 MJ/kg CB for the high-energy mixture, and 9.82 MJ/kg CB for the high-protein mixture.

References

Beauchemin K. A., Kreuzer, M., O'Mara F. & McAllister, T. A. (2008). Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 48(2) 21 - 27.

Ellis, J. L., Kebreab, E., Odongo, N. E., McBride, B. W., Okine, E. K. & France, J. (2007). Prediction of methane production from dairy and beef cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(7), 3456 - 3467.

Getachew, G., Robinson, P. H., DePeters, E. J. & Taylor, S. J. (2004). Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 111(1 - 4), 57 - 71.

Hegarty, R. S. (1999b). Reducing rumen methane emissions through elimination of rumen protozoa. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50(8), 1321 – 1328.

Laleva, S., Yordanova, D., Kalaydzhiev, G., Karabashev, V., Ivanov, N., Angelova, T., Videv, E. & Slavova, S. (2021). In-vitro analysis of gas production in rations with addition of biologically active substances - animal and detox and fresh and lyophilized rumen fluid. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, 35, 31 - 35.

Laleva, S., Yordanova, D., Kalaydzhiev, G., Karabashev, V., Ivanov, N., Angelova, T. & Vasilev, V. (2022). Comparative study of gas production, digestibility and metabolic energy in different feeds by in vitro analysis with fresh and lyophilized rumen fluid. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, 39, 285 - 290.

McAllister, T. A., Beauchemin. K. A., McGinn, S. M., Hao, X. & Robinson, P. H. (2011). Greenhouse gases in animal agriculture-Finding a balance between food production and emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166 - 167, 1 - 6.

Meale, S. J., McAllister, T. A., Beauchemin, K. A., Harstad, O. M. & Chaves, A. V. (2013). Strategies to reduce greenhouse gases from ruminant livestock. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A-Animal Science 62(4), 199 - 211.

Menke, K. H. & Steingass, H. (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research Development, 28, 7 - 55.

Moss, A. R., Jouany, J. P. & Newbold, J. (2000). Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Annales de zootechnie, 49(3), 231 - 253. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2000119.

Naghadeh, A. A., Alijoo, Y. A. & Naserian, A. A. (2020). Different processing effects on nutritive value of barely grains by gas production method. Veterinary Research Forum 11(1), 59 - 65. doi: 10.30466/vrf.2017.84395.2022.

Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B., Ogle, S., O’Mara, F., Rice, C., Scholes, B. & Sirotenko, O. (2007). Agriculture. In: Climate Change 2007: Mitigation.Contribution of Working Group III to the FourthAssessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Eds B. Metz. O.R. Davidson. P.R. Bosch. R. Dave & L.A. Meyer. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge: United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

Tagliapietra, F., Cattani, M., Hansen, H. H., Hindrich-sen, I. K., Bailoni, L. & Schiavon, S. (2011). Metabolizable energy content of feeds based on 24 or 48 h in situ NDF digestibility and on in vitro 24 h gas production methods. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 170(3 - 4), 182 - 191. ISSN 0377-8401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.09.008.

Todorov, N., Krachunov, I., Dzhuvinov, D. & Aleksandrov, A. (2007). Animal nutrition guide, Sofia. MATKOM. ISBN 978-954-9930-47-4 (Bg).

Uslu, O. S., Kurt, O., Kaya, E. & Kamalak, A. (2018).Effect of species on chemical composition, metabolizable energy, organic matter digestibility and methane production of some legume plants grown in Turkey. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 1158 - 1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1480485.

Videv, E. (2017). Evaluation of different feeds and feed additives as inhibitors and stimulants on greenhouse gas production in the digestive process of ruminants. Doctoral dissertation. Agricultural Academy, Sofia.

Published

28.10.2025

How to Cite

Mihaylova, M., Krastanov, J., Angelova, T., Yordanova , D., & Videv, E. (2025). Possibilities for forecasting the exchange energy of feed and concentrate mixtures through the level of gas production. Bulgarian Journal of Animal Husbandry, 62(5), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.61308/GHSS8713