Carbon Footprint Labelling and Consumer Food Choices: Opportunities and Barriers for Climate-Smart Diets in Bulgaria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61308/RUNI1820Keywords:
climate-smart diets, locavore, climate change, carbon footprint labelling, consumer food choices, customer rightsAbstract
Climate change raises pressing questions regarding the environmental impact of food systems. Carbon footprinting could serve as a potential measure to guide climate-friendly food consumption in Bulgaria. This study explores the opportunities and challenges of using carbon footprinting to guide consumer behaviour and promote sustainable consumption. The study, based on a detailed analysis of policy guidelines, international standards (GHG Protocol, ISO 14067, LCA), and national socio-economic conditions, assesses the capacity of the Bulgarian food sector to implement transparent climate reporting. The results show that while European policies such as the Green Deal and the Farm to Fork Strategy provide a helpful context, Bulgaria struggles with limited consumer knowledge, insufficient data infrastructure, and financial constraints for SMEs. Consumer interest in sustainability, especially among young people, is growing. However, behavioural inertia, price sensitivity, and lack of knowledge about eco-labels are hindering widespread adoption. The study concludes that carbon footprint labelling in Bulgaria has great potential to promote climate responsibility. However, this can only be achieved through coordinated political support, public awareness campaigns, technological integration, and culturally sensitive communication. Incorporating carbon footprint labelling into national sustainability policies can trigger a broader shift towards climate-friendly diets and help align public behaviour with long-term environmental goals.
References
Čapla, J., Zajác, P., Čurlej, J., & Hanušovský, O. (2025). The current state of carbon footprint quantification and tracking in the agri-food industry. Scifood, 19, 110-127. https://doi.org/10.5219/scifood.28
Di Vita, G., Zanchini, R., & R. D. C. (2024). Sustainable livestock farming in the European Union: A study on beef farms in NUTS 2 regions. Sustainability, 16(3), 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031098
Farghali, M., Osman, A. I., Mohamed, I. M., Chen, Z., Chen, L., Ihara, I., Pow-Seng Yap & Rooney, D. W. (2023). Strategies to save energy in the context of the energy crisis: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(4), 2003-2039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01591-5
Georgia Country Economic Memorandum. (2022). Charting Georgia’s future: Competitive, connected, capable. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/38375
Grubb, M., Jordan, N. D., Hertwich, E., Neuhoff, K., Das, K., Bandyopadhyay, K. R., ... & Oh, H. (2022). Carbon leakage, consumption, and trade. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47(1), 753-795. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-120820-053625;
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030837
Kamenidou, I. C., Mamalis, S. A., Pavlidis, S., & Bara, E. Z. G. (2019). Segmenting the generation Z cohort university students based on sustainable food consumption behavior: A preliminary study. Sustainability, 11(3), 837.
Lamb, W. F., Wiedmann, T., Pongratz, J., Andrew, R., Crippa, M., Olivier, J. G., Wiedenhofer, D. Mattioli, G., Khourdajie, A. A. & House, J. (2021). A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018. Environmental research letters, 16(7), 073005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e
Mihai, F. C., Gündoğdu, S., Markley, L. A., Olivelli, A., Khan, F. R., Gwinnett, C., Gutberlet, J., Reyna-Bensusan. N., Llanquileo-Melgarejo, P., Meidiana, Cr., Elagroudy, Sh., Isachenko, V., Penney, S., Lenkiewicz, Z. & Molinos-Senante, M. (2021). Plastic pollution, waste management issues, and circular economy opportunities in rural communities. Sustainability, 14(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010020
Pietrzyck, K., Petersen, B., & Jarzębowski, S. (2018). The role of quality management in the context of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): the case of the Polish agri-food sector. Problems of Agricultural Economics, 3(356). https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/94479
Vecchio, R. (2013). Determinants of willingness-to-pay for sustainable wine: Evidence from experimental auctions. Wine Economics and Policy, 2(2), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2013.11.002
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
