Socio-economic perspectives for Bulgarian agriculture in a changing political environment

Authors

  • Plamena Yovchevska Institute of Agrarian Economics, Agricultural Academy – Sofia Author
  • Daniela Tsvyatkova Institute of Agrarian Economics, Agricultural Academy – Sofia Author

Keywords:

agriculture, land relations, small and family farms, socio-economic perspectives

Abstract

An attempt to identify markers for the manifestation of certain socio-economic prospects for Bulgarian agriculture, as a result of the changing political situation in Bulgaria, is the aim of this study. The genesis of some of the modern processes in the sector can be dated more than three decades ago. With the transformation of the social model in our country, changes begin, which mark two significant economic transitions – to a free market and to a common European market. The processes that take place in the national economic system have a strong impact on the economic environment in the agricultural sector. The monopoly advantages for the development of agriculture in our country fall within the coordinate system of political decisions for cardinal agrarian reform, the emanation of which was the restitution of the land to the former owners “in real boundaries“, reform dominated by motives for restored justice and administrative decisions taken in the absence of in-depth economic analysis. Agriculture passes through a high share of uncultivated land, looking for a way to the market economy. When joining the common European market, a number of imbalances with the rank of inequalities appear, which arise from the intensive expansion of the production of extensive crops with a merged surface, as a consequence of the chosen method of support – per unit area. Intensive – the fruit and vegetable sectors, and the livestock sub-sector have been declared “vulnerable”. Migration processes to large urban centers accelerate the depopulation of a number of small settlements in rural areas. These processes are at odds with changes in Community agricultural policy and cause adverse socio-economic problems. The changes that have taken place in the Bulgarian society find expression in the trust that some of the political subjects receive during the last election process in our country. The request for a change in the legislative initiative testifies to the identified problems in Bulgarian agriculture and the will to improve the socio- economic prospects for the sector.

References

Анастасова – Чопева, М. (2020). Проблеми на младите фермери в България с достъпа до земеделска земя и инвестиционна активност в поземлените ресурси. Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 65(3), 14-26.

Бенчева, Н. (2010). Изграждане на регионални агроклъстери – предимства и перспективи на развитие. Годишник на Колеж по икономика и администрация – Пловдив. Т. VІІ, 9-18.

Габе, П. (1890). По земледелческия въпрос. Изд. Скоропечатница на Спиро Голубчев, Русе. 1890 г. с. 46.

Кабакчиева, П. (2007). Двуликият Янус: Европейски правила в посткомунистическа среда. Случаят САПАРД. Социологически проблеми, 39(3-4), 121-150.

Котева, Н. (2016). Развитие и конкурентоспособност на земеделските стопанства в България в условията на ОСП на ЕС. Изд. „Авангад Прима“. С. 2016. ISBN 978-619-160-635-1

Коцева-Тикова, М. & Мочурова, М. (2021). Биоикономическата активност в България в условията на коронавирус. Икономика и управление на селското стопанство. 66(3), с. 85-94.

Мантарова, А. (2018). Институции, неправителствен сектор и граждани в подкрепа на развитието на биоземеделието в България. Политически хоризонти. Година II, бр. 6. ISSN: 2534-966X, с. 117-140.

Найденова, П. (2021). Развитие на демографската мисъл в България. Демографските нюанси от интерес за нашите изследователи. Политически хоризонти. Година V, бр. 5. ISSN:2534-966X, с. 72-126.

Николова, Г. (2020). Преброяване на земеделските стопанства в България през 2020 година – цели и предизвикателства пред селскостопанската статистика. Статистика, бр. 3, ISSN 2367-5489.

Петков, В. (2013). Потенциални икономически ефекти от промените в ОСП през програмния период 2014–2020 г. върху българското селско стопанство. Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 58(3)..

Рангелова, Р. (2015). Селското стопанство като фактор за промени в българското село. Достъпно онлайн на: http://www. omda. bg/uploaded_ files/files/articles/SELA_za_PRODAN-2_1429175939.pdf.

Съйкова, Св., Атанасов, А., Ченгелова, Е. (2014). Социалните емпирични изследвания. Методологически аспекти. София, Академично издателство „Проф. Марин Дринов“, ISBN 978-954-322-788-4, 394 с.

Тодорова, Ст, „Структурни аспекти на социалния капитал в българското земеделие“, http://www.jaem.info/2007/01-07-07.pdf

Хаджийски, Ив. (1974). Оптимистична теория за нашия народ. Том 1. Бит и душевност на българския народ. Том 2. София. Български писател.

Atherton, A., & Lyon, F. (2001). Segmenting Support for Small and Medium Enterprises: Identifying and Disseminating Best Practice the Foundation for Small and Medium Enterprise Development. University of Durham, Durham.

Eikeland, S., & Lie, I. (1999). Pluriactivity in rural Norway. Journal of Rural Studies, 15(4), 405-415.

Frankelius, P. (2009). Questioning two myths in innovation literature. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 20(1), 40-51.

Glover, J. L., & Reay, T. (2015). Sustaining the family business with minimal financial rewards: How do family farms continue? Family Business Review, 28(2), 163-177.

Jarillo, J. C., & Stevenson, H. H. (1991). Co-operative strategies - The payoffs and the pitfalls. Long range planning, 24(1), 64-70.

Mihailova, M. (2020). The state of agriculture in Bulgaria–PESTLE analysis. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 26(5), 935-943.

Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard business review, 71(3), 75-86.

Muller, E. (1995). Europe 2000+. Cooperation for European territorial development. http://aei.pitt.edu/41761/

P. Dwyer & Shaw, S. (eds.). (2013). An Introduction to Social Policy. London and Thousand Oaks, CA. Journal of Social Policy 43(04):863-865, pp. 224, DOI:10.1017/ S0047279414000518.

Porter, M. E. (2003, August–October). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, Vol. 37, Nos. 6/7, pp. 549-578.

Rosenfeld, S. A. (1997). Bringing business clusters into the mainstream of economic development. European planning studies, 5(1), 3-23.

Sabeva, M. (2020). Effect of Policy Measures Supporting the Agricultural Sector in Bulgaria After EU Membership. Economic Alternatives, (1), 91-104.

Schultz, T. (1964). Transforming Traditional Agriculture. Yale University Press, Economic Growth and Agriculture, MacGraw-Hill, 1968.

https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf

https://m.dir.bg/business/pazari/smyana-na-modelav-zemedelieto-eto-kak-predlagat-da-stane-tova-pregovaryashtite активно на 24.11.2021г.

https://www.segabg.com/hot/category-economy/kiril-petkov-shte-izgonim-politicheskite-investitori-zemedelieto активно на 24.11.2021 г.

https://www.unwe.bg/doi/eajournal/2020.1/EA.2020.1.05.pdf

http://arbitrageresearch.com/bg/wpcontent/uploads/2021/11/%D0%A3%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%89%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%84%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F.pdf.

https://www.dnes.bg/business/2021/11/30/imamedadenosti-za-otglejdane-na-shafran-no-ne-i-pazar.51235

Published

31.12.2021

How to Cite

Socio-economic perspectives for Bulgarian agriculture in a changing political environment. (2021). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Management, 66(4), 67-82. https://agriacad.eu/ojs/index.php/bjaem/article/view/2086